Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

was wondering if running the airflow meter after the throttle body would work properly.

when running a bov with an afm, i have heard of engines stalling due to being flooded because air is still going through the afm (and out the bov) when the throttle body is closed. you could run no bov but that puts strain on the compressor blades.

just wondering if this would work.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30661-throttle-bodies-and-airflow-meters/
Share on other sites

A post-TB AFM would not work. When the TB is closed, there would be no air flow. And #2, the AFM isn't calibrated to work in that location - Most AFMs are supposed to be before the turbo i.e. non-pressurized.

The major stalling problem is when your dealiting with venting BOVs. THe ECU sees air going into the turbo/intake track, but when the BOV vents to the atsmosphere, the ECU looses track of the air, so at the subsequent idle, the ECU thinks there is way more air, runs pig rich and drowns itself.

A remedey of that is going to a different AFM type, or getting a computer to mount the hot-wire afm in a new place. Most aftermarket computers replace the stock AFM with a MAP (manifold absolute pressure) device that doesn't read any airflow in the track, but regulates fuel by intake pressures.

I'm running a Z32 AFM on my CA18DET in a blow-through arrangement at the moment. A GReddy E-manage controls the fuelling.

Heres a picture of the installation. Its bodged in at the moment because I just wanted to check it worked before trying it on the RB25DET I'm installing in January.

After%20cooler%20MAF.jpg

Seems to work well now its mapped and it overcomes the overfuelling problems I used to have with atmospheric BOV's.

Heres a picture that somebody posted recently of one fitted to an RB too.

Blow%20through%20AFM%20RB25DET.jpg

Hi clicks, "plastic afm.. warm compressed air..." How about plastic AFM, 35 degree compressed air (after the intercooler, so not too warm) compared to 80 degree engine bay. I think the plastic can handle the temperature pretty easily.

I have seen quite a few drag GTR's in Japan with a Q45 90 mm AFM plumbed in between the intercooler and the throttle body. Just align the ID of the intercooler pipework with the ID of the AFM, no restriction there. They seem to work fine, but I must admit the first time I saw I was a bit perplexed.

When you think about it though, it's not such a silly idea. It fixes the atmosphere vented BOV problem, removes any possibility of restriction on the turbo inlet and it eliminates the air reversion problems of running a big turbo/turbos close behind the AFM. Best of all you get to run an AFM and not have to resort to the less precise MAP sensor driven ECU.

So mambastu, let us know how it works out. I am particularly interested in what the voltage ramp table looks like.

Sydneykid. I never thaught of it that way. I guess it was just a first idea that came to my head and set off the alarm bells.

Given the oppertunity would you do it?

When I fitted it I wasn't too worried about heat but I was worried about the boost pressure as the RB with the blow-through setup looks like its got a metal cap on it. Did you notice that on the cars you saw in Japan Sydneykid ?

I have noticed that the MAF is very sensitive to throttle position in its new location, presumably because its so close to the throttle body. When the RB goes in I'll use a GTR34 intercooler and move the AFM much further away from the throttlebody so hopefully the airflow will be a bit more stable.

Does anyone know if a hotwire AFM can cope with water vapour OK ? I was planning to use water injection at the intercooler outlet end of the inlet pipe which means that it would be blowing a water/air mix through the AFM. This seems (to me anyway) to be the best way of doing it as the AFM would compensate slightly for the cooler charge but if it will cause reliability problems I'll run the jet after the AFM. The WI system I'll use will be mappable anyway.

  • 4 months later...
I realise im bringing up an old thread here..

But how have people gone with this?

I'm now running it on the newly fitted RB25DETT in my S13 :P

It works fine, in fact a lot better than it did on the old CA18DET. The AFM is level with the O/S/F wing so theres a reasonable amount of pipework on either side and the airflow is now a lot more stable. Haven't had the car on a dyno yet but I have used an AP22 perfomance meter on it and over a few runs it was averaging a peak of 330bhp at the rear wheels on 14psi.

I've got a water injection kit waiting to go on before I raise the boost a little more and finalise the mapping. I haven't touched the ignition map yet.

Finished%2003.jpg

I agree with Sydneykid, it is a very good idea, but some caution is needed.

Provided a decent intercooler is being used there should be no problems, but there might be if there are very sudden temperature spikes reaching the airflow meter. Hot wire airflow meters will track air temperature changes very well, but they were never designed to do this extremely rapidly.

A hot wire airflow meter is what you already have in your Skyline.

It works on the principle of heating a fine wire to a temperature that is higher than the air flowing through the airflow meter. The air flowing through the flowmeter tries to cool down the wire, so the electronics in the flowmeter bumps up the wire heating current to keep it at the correct operating temperature. That is how they work.

As more air flows into your engine, the airflow meter wire requires more heating current to keep it hot, that current also provides the flow signal back to the ECU.

The circuit that decides how much current to feed into the hot wire, also needs to know what the air temperature is going through the flowmeter so it can adjust wire current to keep the wire at the correct amount hotter.

This usually uses either another wire, or a bead thermistor to measure air temperature. This usually just monitors entering ambient air so it does not normally have to respond very fast to outside air temperature changes.

If you installed the flowmeter right at the turbo outlet, the massive fast changing temperature swings would give it a mighty hard time trying to work out what was a temperature change and what was a flow change.

A decent intercooler SHOULD keep the inlet air temperature to the engine reasonably constant, or at least it is not going to go up and down by 100C in one second when you change gear.

So basically if you situated the AFM right after the intercooler and you have a decent intercooler this theory should be sound...

I would agree with you steve, I think from what Warpspeed said that water injection right before the AFM will cause troubles!

Thanks for the info WarpSpeed

I had never thought about upstream water injection with this setup.

Thinking about it, it may very well cause some problems. Best ask one of the heating ventilation and air-conditioning engineers (HVAC) about this, any of you guys out there ?

How does sensible cooling vary with changes in humidity ?

If for example, you blow 50C relatively dry air, as compared to blowing 50C 100% relative humidity air over a hot dry object, how does that effect the heat transfer into the cooler airstream ? ? ?

Warpspeed who knows nothing, is always eager to learn something new......... !

My gut tells me that water has a far higher specific heat than dry air, and more of it is going to suck out more heat, but I would like to hear from someone that really knows about this stuff.

And if it's true, how does a standard hot wire AFM cope with large changes in relative humidity ?

havent people been doing this on VL commodores for years?I remember seeing it a number of times and i questioned the life span on the afm considering that they had enough trouble in there original position let alone down stream....they seemed just as happy down stream though

havent people been doing this on VL commodores for years?I remember seeing it a number of times and i questioned the life span on the afm considering that they had enough trouble in there original position let alone down stream....they seemed just as happy down stream though

i totally agree.

more than 70% of the VL turbos ive seen (i seen a lot) down here in Vic have the AFM after the I/C and before the T/B.

They run fine, infact, they run extremely well with no problems at all.

Seems to be a standard/accepted mod as most of them run no BOV to get the ful-sik 'choo choo'. So it seems to stop the stalling etc etc being close to the T/B

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Don't even try to run it on the stock ECU if you're going to have the boost controller bring boost above ~10 psi. I've already told you that. If you use the Nistune ECU, you will need to CAREFULLY read the available documentation for Neo tuning, and read some threads on the Nistune forums, to discover the various things you have to do to prevent the ECU from going bananas when the boost is too high. The is a table associated with th boost sensor that must be modified to prevent it from shitting the bed. This is just one of the things that you will need to do to the tune in Nistune, because the Neo turbo ECU will be expecting to see a number of things (such as the TCS) that are not there, and you have to block the DTCs on those. It is totally not surprising to me that you are having the problems that you are, but the solutions to these problems have been known for >15 years. So just get it done.
    • Hi. Sry iam not a mechanic and iam not at the car atm so i dont know 100% but they told they measure those and even try to change those. AFM they have two. Coils are new a they have my old one too. Plugs too. ECU...we have 25 NEO stock and Nistune 25 NEO.   But i dont know if any one those could be the problem and why/if/what can cause this, Only thing they did not check is fuel...but that walbro 255 is new(like 1,5 years)... That fuel pressure gauge idk...but i let them know Any suggestions?   EDIT: how can they know if it is like you say he ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high? Tha car has boost controler
    • Can you clarify what you mean by boost cut, do you mean it misfires both when under load (driving) and when stationary and out of gear? Or does the ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high (boost control issue)? Does it occur at idle with no throttle? When you say "the ECU is OK", what ECU is it and why do you think it is OK? Have you used the NEO ECU, and if so do you have a MAP sensor attached? Same for the AFM, why do you think it is OK? Do you have any way to put a fuel pressure gauge on it (even just a mechanical one between the fuel filter and fuel rail)?
    • Hi.. Just another problem. So maybe you can help. I(my mechanic) done swap from my RB20DE NEO to RB25DET NEO. Everything is OK but we have a boost cut. Coils/Plugs are ok...AFM is ok. ECU is ok. I have Walbro 255 but it "changed" sound few months ago(you can hear it ouside) you did not hear that when it was new(maybe faulty?) Sooo...what now? What can cause this boost cut? It is even when you standing still...
×
×
  • Create New...