Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

JAS-25T, If you want to increase the boost my first suggestion is to regap your spark plugs to 0.8mm. Doing this with the standard ECU should allow you to run about 10-11psi. After that, as others have already mentioned, "overboost protection" sets in and misfire problems occur.  

I upped the boost with a bleeder (to about 9psi) and ran into misfire problems above 4500rpm. I then regapped my spark plugs and could run 10-11psi without it being an issue. However, the real gains from the boost increase were noticed once I got a hold of a chipped ECU which has far better ignition timing than standard. Boost comes on earlier, more midrange responsiveness, and redline is acheived quicker. I can now also up the boost until the turbo goes bang :( I'm currently running 13psi.  

Regapping the spark plugs to 0.8mm can help (and is cheap i.e. $0) but better engine management is the real key.... if only the stock ECU could be reprogrammed....

this is the exact kind of answer i was looking for

thank you very much

Hi GTRman1992, sorry for the sarcasm, I couldn't resist it.

I have never tuned a Skyline that gained less than 20 rwkw (average from 4,000 rpm to 7,00 rpm) from correcting the A/F ratios and optimising the ignition timing. The more modified the car, the higher the gains from tuning. Thus far, my highest ever increase in average power from tuning alone (ie; no extra boost) was 150 rwkw. Your car would fall somewhere in between, looking at the mods you’ve listed between 30 to 40 rwkw would be my guess.

As for which ECU, standard or aftermarket it really depends on the quality of the tuner and whether or not your are going to do more mods. If you have finished upgrading then a good tuner will be able to extract the max from the standard ECU for around $800. If you have more mods to go then it will cost $350 to $450 every time it needs a retune.

In that case it would be cheaper to go for an aftermarket ECU (my recommendation would be a Power FC), cost around $1100 plus tuning $200 to $300. As you can see you get the extra expenditure back pretty fast if you have a plan of further, ongoing mods.

Hope that helps

Thanks for that SydneyKid, finally a definitive answer on the subject!

All I'm really planning to add to the car is bigger injectors (550cc to 600cc), a 600x300x97 intercooler, better intake plumbing to the air box some adjustable CAM gears (an article in ZOOM claimed 20rwkw without loss anywhere in power band - they had dyno prints).

All I'm after is around 600HP at the flywheel.

Oh yea, I also plan on adding my direct port, 3D mapped water/methanol injection system once I build it. I'm thinking of using it to get more aggressive timing as I think 20psi boost is heaps.

Hi GTRman1992, it is not really an issue of how much boost, but rather one of how much efficient (not overheated) airflow. I haven't seen anywhere near 600 bhp from a pair of turbine only, upgraded standard GTR turbos. Around 550 bhp seems to be their limit. With set of N1 (or LM) internals, they are OK for a bit over 600 (625) bhp.

Most I have ever seen out of adjustable cam pulleys only, was 40 rwkw, max at one rpm point. I didn't work out the average, unfortunately.

Hope that helps some more.

Ok, I thought more boost = less engine life. So you say more boost as long as air temp is ok. Interesting. Maybe I can aim for my original 23psi - 25psi limit.

My turbo's have an interesting background. They are genuine ex-gibson units. Back when the GTR was banned from racing, Gibson motorsport had an action and unloaded all their stuff, anyway someone I know bought a set of turbos and put then away for a special day. That day never came and he offered them to me. I had them rebuilt etc. So they should be good for 600HP at 23psi boost as that is what I think Gibson was running.

The article on the CAMS said 4deg retard on exhaust and 2deg advance on the inlet was ideal.

can i pull back this very technical (for me) thread with a biasic question? (lol)...

If i wanna take my r32 gtst from stock (10psi) to say about 14psi... what would you suggest (ps i have a BUDGET)...

I was thinking AVC-R + AFC?

or should i get a chipped ecu?

who can chip them in syd? or should i get one from a wreckers?.... doh! i'm losing myself now..... lol

Nah, i'll be putting on a nice FMIC first... but i don wanna use a bleed valve 'cause i don't want all that boost spike and crap, i want it done properly.... and when i said budget, i just meant i can't afoord a worked GTR running 20PSI like some (i think thats a strong case of jealosy there)....

riggaP:... from what i understand (please correct my errors), bleeders 'trick' the car into thinking it's still running 10psi while it's actually running, say, 12 etc.... I just don't trust something that is tricking my car... i'd prefer the car to know it was running 12psi.... sounds stupid but i'm sure you can understand what i'm tryin to say.... can you elaborate on this?... thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...