Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So ive got my wideband controller working on the bench, time to hook it up to the car and get some data logging done.

The wideband controller has various inputs for speed, rpm etc... all from the ecu.

What I would like to know is, what is the best way to tap into the ecu to get the signal? Im fearing the only way I have is to cut and re solder the wire harness as it comes out of the ECU.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/308608-best-way-to-tap-into-ecu-wires/
Share on other sites

STOP!!!! Dont cut the wires, just strip some of the coating off them and splice the wires you wish to tap in around the bare ecu wires and solder them together and

tape it up with some good quality electrical tape.

post-41401-1266391544_thumb.jpg

Picture care of evilution.co.uk

post-41401-1266391743_thumb.jpg

Picture care of legacygarage.com

Hope that helps. :thumbsup:

99 GTT, perfect, actually dont know why I didnt think of that its so obvious...

errno, i've seen those before, but im a bit skeptical, what if they cut in too deep, id worry about the wire breaking over time.

Thanks guys, off to do some soldering tomorrow and hopefully logging some AFRs

Edited by ascenion24

These join every phone line cable in NSW, look inside those cylindrical junction boxes and you will see hundreds of them, Ive used them on and of for the last 20 yrs and had no problems.

if they cut only the insulation then there not making contact with the copper, so they must come into contact and therefor cut the copper wire to some degree.

Im guessing you'd have to know the thickness of your insulation to get the right size of those joiny thingos... seems to much of a pain in the ass considering the consequences could be no connection or cut wire.

http://www.takakaira.co.jp/Main.aspx

Field one touch connector FTW!!!!!!!!

Not a cheap option but undoubtedly the BEST way

combined with the strip an solder method I think

If only temporary though Solder a bit of solid wire to ya leads

an push into the back of the plug

Edited by noone

a while ago i thought i'd give those little clip things a go, to install a SAFC on my old 32. driving up the motorway one day and the unit just died, hence my car died. not fun at 100kph. it was that little clip splicer thing that wasn't giving a good connection, and yes i did use the correct sized one for the cable i was splicing. i wouldn't recommend them to anyone.

what i like to do is cut the wire. strip the ends. slide a piece of heatshrink down the wire. solder it back up. slide the heatshrink over the join and shrink it down. you cant go wrong if you solder a wire properly.

if they cut only the insulation then there not making contact with the copper, so they must come into contact and therefor cut the copper wire to some degree.

Im guessing you'd have to know the thickness of your insulation to get the right size of those joiny thingos... seems to much of a pain in the ass considering the consequences could be no connection or cut wire.

Put your credit card against your leg, is it touching your leg, has it cut your leg.

Do you use M8 bolts to go onto a M6 nut, of course not, you use the correct size.

Ive connected up my shift light recently in 20 seconds, that included wrapping the connection in insulation tape, and, there is no drop in volts from the ECU to the light.

Ive used these for 20 odd years and if you do the job correctly you wont have any problems.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...