Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Trent, you seem to be the resident guru on intercoolers.. Could you tell me if you have seen any successful track cars running the standard crossflow (pass over radiator) intercooler kit by justjap?

Am liking the price, want the cross flow for sake of engine bay setup.. but dont know if i should jimmy in a GTR cooler (i have lying around) with a cooling pro pipe kit OR just buy a cooling pro kit.

options are: cooling pro crossflow kit, GTR cooler with cooling pro pipes choped to suit, GTR cooler with end tanks chopped and 2.5" outlets put on straight with cooling pro pipe kit.

Would be good to hear some opinions..

we send alot of cusomers that way for thier turn flow stuff, pretty good value for money. The also stock the blitz gear which is one of the best coolers around for skylines.

so cooling pro would flow really good for up to like 600 hp ? wat bout hdi ? i dont wana spend to much money but i dont wana get something shit either

please help

thanks

To be asking a question of 600hp and cooling-pro would appear to me that someone needs to do some signifigant research.

The chinese kits/copies generally are fine for 250-280rwkw... but much more you really need to spend a tad more and get better cores etc etc.

600hp would require a decent cooler. R34 GTR ones will do 350rwkw (~600hp) easily enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...