Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The car went for its MOT and passed . Needed a front wheel bearing and a CV boot .

Ive also found out the springs were cut down a bit so have fitted stock ones which sits the car a little higher .

Ive removed the tacky foglight and wired the foglight through the heated screen switch to one of the reversing lights .This has the required warning light when its on (needed for UK regs) and means no extra switches on the dash . If I want the heated sceen on i have a hidden crosssover to convert the switch back to work it

A few pics of the first day out

004_zpsf9147777.jpg

005_zpsb62ecbc1.jpg

Ive been asked my quite a few what its like driving a stock 32GTR . Well now i have taken the car for a nice run I can say.

It wasnt what I expected

First and biggest impression is it doesnt sound like a GTR

The car is amazingly quiet inside - You can even hear the injectors on tickover In fact you cant really hear the exhaust at all untill around 4000rpm . It does liven up after that but it is never even close to loud.

Handling wise its simply awesome for a stock 20+ year old car and goes in and out of all corners as if on rails . Admittedly it does have brand new suspension but even so I am very impressed ,

The brakes are not great but not as bad as I expected having got used to AP.s on my Stagea

The performance is not stunning . I can certainly see why they were/are modded

Around town it is really graet to drIve, . Power ciomes in pretty immeadiately with no lag. It is however not very quick when pushed anf does run out of steam at around 6000. This may be a bit unfair as I am used to twin 2560-5s

On a motorway it will cruise at pretty sensible speeds without a problem . It is actually quite eerie as there is no noise at all at road speed limits .not at all what I expected

But all in all I am very impressed for completely stock 20+ year old car- I think it would have knocked spots off what else was around at the time.

Edited by Greanmachine UK

Awesome work, looks great in factory form.

One thing I'd add is there was a factory option for a rear strut brace (matching in red) and I reckon they improve the R32's handling no end.

  • 1 month later...

Fit it.

The ass rigidity you will thank it for later on.
Especially on wet windy roads.

lol jokes - it just looks cool.
It does make it more stiff in the rear and at speed you can feel the difference (it was like that on my GTS-T's anyway..)

  • 3 months later...

Ive decided to get the wheels redone as they let the rest of the car down.

does anyone know the correct paint name or code as mine are the wrong colour.

Had the car requested for a photoshoot a while back

leedsgtrs_zps9aa44852.jpg

  • 1 month later...

the wheels came back from Lepsoms who did an optical colour match (whatever that is ) on a set of original wheels ..

A few pics of the wheels plus a recent pic of the car

DSC00779_zps8079ee86.jpg

DSC00780_zps2e771552.jpg

DSC00781_zps5978beb2.jpg

[/url]

desktop2_zps9a30d49b.jpg

Edited by Greanmachine UK

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...