Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I installed the aeromotions R2 wing on the r35 recently. I started with a carbon bootlid, and had an auto sparky rig it up so i can swap out the stocker boot+wing for the carbon boot+aeromotions wing - as and when required.

We went to a practice day last wednesday to test it all out, at Eastern Creek. I was running (2nd hand) slicks too (never ran slicks at EC before). Suffice to say the combination of the slicks and wing yielded a 2.2 second improvement (on the lap times). So i would say the wing was good for at least a second. The car felt much more stable and predictable, however i think the biggest advantage is during braking (as the wing has a dynamic angle for braking).

Here's a pic and video, any questions send me a PM...

wing.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/310788-aeromotions-dynamic-wing/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I installed the aeromotions R2 wing on the r35 recently ...

We went to a practice day last wednesday to test it all out, at Eastern Creek. I was running (2nd hand) slicks too (never ran slicks at EC before). Suffice to say the combination of the slicks and wing yielded a 2.2 second improvement (on the lap times) ... The car felt much more stable and predictable, however i think the biggest advantage is during braking (as the wing has a dynamic angle for braking).

Great results there Duncan.

I saw your car during one of Wednesday's sessions at Eastern Creek and it looked great through turn one.

We were at Eastern Creek on Wednesday with Mark Berry's R34 GT-R which is also now running an Aeromotions R2 Dynamic Wing ...

gallery1756.jpg

gallery1760.jpg

Were you running the factory Aeromotions wing tune all day on the R35 or have you done any tuning of the wing settings yet ?

Do you have a datalogger in your car ? What sort of speeds were you seeing through turn one ?

- Adam

I have a question.....you know moveable aero devices are banned by cams right?

Hi Duncan,

The Aeromotions Dynamic Wing has a feature that allows the wing be locked into a static position on race day specifically for events where active aero is not allowed on race day.

There are a set of turnbuckles that can be used to mechanically lock the Dynamic Wing into a fixed static setting for raceday for events where active aero is not allowed.

There is also a static version of the Aeromotions wing without the dynamic controller called the R2 Static Wing ...

http://www.tunersgroup.com/Products/aeromo..._r2_static.html

The dynamic version and the static version of the Aeromotions R2 Wing both use the same low drag, high efficiency wing element profile.

large1274.jpg

In terms of using the Dynamic version in a locked static mode for events where active aero is not allowed on race day, the wing profile of the Aeromotions Dynamic Wing was developed from military research into wing profiles used on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV's).

This cutting edge wing profile provides outstanding efficiency, low drag and superior aerodynamic performance, whether it is run in active mode or locked into static mode.

Teams using the Dynamic Wing in events where active aero is not allowed on race day use the wing in dynamic mode during testing with the in car remote to find the right wing setting quickly, then mechanically lock the wing with the chosen static angle of attack setting for race day.

- Adam

Edited by TheTunersGroup

fair enough, I think that will be required.

Schedule F of General Requirements says:

"Any specific part of the automobile which has an aerodynamic influence on the stability of the automobile

must be mounted on the entirely sprung part of the car and shall be firmly fixed whilst the automobile is in

motion."

So active aero is not legal at any CAMS event including the sprint this sunday, or superlap for that matter. Hopefully the scruits will allow it through and no-one will protest the results, would be a sad way to lose.

The words "firmly fixed whilst the automobile is in motion" need to be clarified for their exact meaning. We will check with CAMS about this.

Schedule F of the CAMS general requirements for cars and drivers does NOT specifically say "active aero is not allowed" - so we will check with CAMS to check if the meaning of "firmly fixed" simply means something like "securely attached so that aero parts do not fly off the car".

If you look at the number of cars that now have active aero as factory standard equipment (including the Mitsubishi GTO / GT3000, Bugatti Veyron, McLaren F1 roadcar, Porsche Panamera, and Ferrari 458 Italia), active aero is becoming more popular as a factory feature.

- Adam

I have a question.....you know moveable aero devices are banned by cams right? if you bring it on sunday hopefully you will be ok.....but bring the standard one as well :D

I asked to run the active wing at sprints and was granted permission, which is why i went ahead and purchased it. But yes it can be locked in a position if required.

Not really a great test for the wing though.

You should have swapped back the std wing and did a few more laps to compair back-to-back.

I would imagine that the slicks would be give you most (if not all) the gains.

Just my 2c

I agree with that. Not the best test/comparison, given the slicks. What i can say though is that the seat of the pants evaluation (on how the car handles/feels) does mean something though. I have run the car on slicks before (just not at EC).

I asked to run the active wing at sprints and was granted permission, which is why i went ahead and purchased it. But yes it can be locked in a position if required.

That's great to know LSX-438 :D

- Adam

Edited by TheTunersGroup
Do you have a datalogger in your car ? What sort of speeds were you seeing through turn one ?

- Adam

Adam yes i had a datalogger and sorry to say i dont have big enough balls. Top speed at T1 apex was 178km (242km/hr vmax on the straight). Probably another 10km/hr easily at t1 when i get my act together. I just need to learn to trust the aero. :D

I would expect the R34 would be well over 200km/hr at T1 apex? Totally different class of car, awesome.

Edited by LSX-438
interested to know the result thanks Adam

nice setup Dunc

Are you really going to take the boot on and off regularly or do you rarely street the car?

more pics!

Dunno if i will bother swapping it out but we will see. Another reason to package it up on an aftermarket boot is so that i can sell it as a bolt-off / bolt-on package later, and return the car to stocker appearance quickly and easily. Something to note is that Nissan AU are asking $3000 for a blank (unpainted of course) boot lit, with no wing on it! The carbon item was less than 1/3 the price.

Not really a great test for the wing though.

You should have swapped back the std wing and did a few more laps to compair back-to-back.

Hi Al,

A number of teams running the Aeromotions Dynamic Wings have already publicly released info on their lap time improvements with the Aeromotions Dynamic Wing. Physics works exactly the same way in Australia as it does in the US, so the US results are just as relevant to Australia.

Aeromotions also did a back to back test at Thunderhill Raceway. As it says on our website, lap times at the back to back test were ...

Without Aeromotions Wing: 2 minutes 10.1 seconds

With Aeromotions Static Wing: 2 minutes 9.2 seconds

With Aeromotions Dynamic Wing: 2 Minutes 8.4 seconds

With Aeromotions Dynamic Wing With Centre Fence: 2 minutes 7.7 seconds.

Lap times with the Aeromotions Dynamic Wing With Centre Fence were 1.5 seconds a lap faster than with a static wing, and 2.4 seconds faster than without an Aeromotions wing.

You can find links to the test data and a video of the back to back test with Traqmate Data Acquisition, a summary of the data and info about the car, driver and testing methodology, detailed turn by turn data analysis including plots turn by turn of the lateral G-force, acceleration and braking G-force, velocity, and time difference here ...

http://www.tunersgroup.com/Products/aeromotions.html

There are a bunch of comments here from various teams about the lap time improvements they have had running the Aeromotions Wing ...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4916143

- Adam

interested to know the result thanks Adam
Probably another 10km/hr easily at t1 when i get my act together. I just need to learn to trust the aero.

I would expect the R34 would be well over 200km/hr at T1 apex? Totally different class of car, awesome.

Hi handbrake,

I'll ask Mark Berry on Monday for an official comment about the performance of the Advan / Hi Octane Racing R34 GT-R with the Aeromotions Dynamic Wing.

We can't (and wouldn't) post any test data from Mark's R34 without the team's permission. Generally top teams in events like the World Time Attack Challenge don't publish their testing lap times as there is no point in letting the overseas cars know how what lap times the R34 is doing :D

We had video cameras on the R34 on Wednesday at Eastern Creek, and the video is absolutely mindblowing - the R34 is an absolute weapon. I'll ask Mark if we can post some segments from the video footage on Monday.

Yep Duncan, confidence is a big factor at turn one at Eastern Creek. It's a lot smoother now than it was a few years ago - does anyone else remember the old surface change in turn one ? The Supercharged 911 would step out at the rear as it hit the surface change in turn one - "interesting" at that speed :spank:

There is a video of it doing that in turn one in the second video on this page ...

http://www.tunersgroup.com/Videos/Supercharged_911.html

- Adam

Edited by TheTunersGroup
Adam yes i had a datalogger and sorry to say i dont have big enough balls. Top speed at T1 apex was 178km (242km/hr vmax on the straight). Probably another 10km/hr easily at t1 when i get my act together. I just need to learn to trust the aero. :D

Dunc, you may find that you are not actually any quicker across the face of turn 1 at EC due to the 'sitting a fat kid in the boot' effect of the wing. As we both know high speed oversteer is not an issue with the GTR, so giving more rear downforce (unbalanced) will generate more high speed understeer, a condition to which the GTR is naturally prone, and one that is acceptable, however not desirable. The real advantage of the AM wing on the GTR will be seen when the nose is balanced with better downforce - at least thats my take on it. Testing Monday :spank:

The words "firmly fixed whilst the automobile is in motion" need to be clarified for their exact meaning. We will check with CAMS about this.

Schedule F of the CAMS general requirements for cars and drivers does NOT specifically say "active aero is not allowed" - so we will check with CAMS to check if the meaning of "firmly fixed" simply means something like "securely attached so that aero parts do not fly off the car".

If you look at the number of cars that now have active aero as factory standard equipment (including the Mitsubishi GTO / GT3000, Bugatti Veyron, McLaren F1 roadcar, Porsche Panamera, and Ferrari 458 Italia), active aero is becoming more popular as a factory feature.

- Adam

Hi Adam, I am pretty confident that fixed means fixed in relation to the body, not just that it can't fall off.....these rules have been in place a long time and active aero is not a new idea

I asked to run the active wing at sprints and was granted permission, which is why i went ahead and purchased it. But yes it can be locked in a position if required.

good to hear, I would hate to see it impact the champioship

Adam yes i had a datalogger and sorry to say i dont have big enough balls. Top speed at T1 apex was 178km (242km/hr vmax on the straight). Probably another 10km/hr easily at t1 when i get my act together. I just need to learn to trust the aero. :mad:

I would expect the R34 would be well over 200km/hr at T1 apex? Totally different class of car, awesome.

You might be surprised about how little quicker other cars can go through there, it very quickly becomes a question of outright grip and the weight of the car. Anything over 1200kg is likely to have comparable speeds through there, and that includes up to supercars (I do not know their exact speeds, but not much over 200, ie within 10% of your speed). Of course a sports sedan with full aero and 800kg carries a few km more and I guess the formula cars are running up to 240 though there.

I doubt it has much if anything to do with your commitment in the turn. Very strong top speed btw considering how stock it is.

I asked to run the active wing at sprints and was granted permission, which is why i went ahead and purchased it. But yes it can be locked in a position if required.

I'd be interested to know who's granted you permission to use it Duncan.

My (and I'll bet I'm not alone) issue with it being locked, is whats to stop it being un-locked after scrutineering. If all the front runners start using it,(me included) we will need pre-grid and post grid inspections, which would suck.

I'm far from happy with it even being on the car quite frankly and I would hate to see you win the championship again and then be protested.

Oh by the way I've asked the Supersprint panel to change the web site so your car is up as the No 1 car.

Neil.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...