Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I have had my R32 for almost 12 months, Someone I know know's a thing or 2 about GTRs (has a mighty quick 34 v-spec he built/tuned in between tuning various motorbikes) and I mentioned that my car is running about 20psi (1.4ish bar) as it arrived from Japan, he seemed pretty sure that the car would not have a stock bottom end. Looking through the "Engine Failure" thread it does seem that it could be a lot of boost for a stocker, all that we are 100% sure of is steel turbos (cause otherwise they would have blown up) 3.5" exhaust, and HKS hard piping kit (and boost controller).

I am not running this sort of boost everyday, but the car is very happy running it...

So, is it likely a stock bottom end will put up with this?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/311006-can-i-get-some-opinions/
Share on other sites

don't assume, best to check and be sure

does it have signs of a different ECU?

i mean it makes no sens to have a built motor, aftermarket turbochargers and a stock ECU (unless remapped rare)

i mean how much was it to buy? surely if someone was selling a car and it a had built motor the price would reflect it

do you have any reason to suspect its got aftermarket turbo's and a built motor - did the price reflect this?

check the ECU - look for remap stickers, wiring looms hacks or aftermarket replacement

ECU we assume to be stock (Has a speed limiter anyway), turbos are stock size (with standard non N1 markings), but are still making 20psi all the way. Background on the car is hard to find, an Aussie buyer in Japan picked it up to restore, then changed his mind, sent it to Aus, his aus buyer had it and an evo 6.5, but was intructed by his other half to reduce wheeled toys by one to maintain boobed toy. Apart from mods listed in first post power wise, it has a fuel pressure reg (but just a screw one), Apexi pods, and a turbo Y-pipe with "Progress" written on it and the fuel pump is a bit noisier than I expected... Price reflected the fact that the paint on the bonnet and front guard do not reflect S#!T... $22k with about 80k on it

Well, Exhaust, hard piping kit, fuel pressure reg, pod filters, boost controller are all pretty easy to spot, we pulled everything down to the turbos off to check what they were, markings were as per standard in another topic on the forums. The steel turbines, basically with the boost controller on high it went to 1.4 bar, and stayed there, and has done it for 5 runs at the drags and a few other times, was not really how I intended to check if the turbines were steel or Ceramic... But it is fairly certain, also does not reach full boost until almost 4500, which seems a bit late for ceramic turbos. Computer wise, have not pulled the kick plate off, but if someone was going to play, surely they would remove the limiter.. Not really after a difinitve answer that the car has forged Wisecos, H-beam rods, a big crank and a Steel gasket, just whether I should stay well away from that much boost until we know more, or if it is LIKELY to be ok here and there...

Pull your spark plugs out, shine a torch in and have a good look. Most of the time its pretty easy to tell factory cast Nissan pistons to aftermarket items (obviously if you know what factory cast pistons look like).

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...