Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2530's are not the turbo.

You want GT-SS's, the smaller ones - if you go twins.

Or a 3076 .82, both will see you around 330rwkw give/take.

which one will give response? GT-SS or the GT3076r .82?

will GT-SS produce 350RWKW without a strugle?

Can i use GT3076R .63 rear for more response?

Well you said close to 350rwkw, 330rwkw is close in my book. GT-SS's and a GT3076 are similar in output and both should be making 330rwkw on around 20psi.

Every motor is different as is the build, and they are all factors.

Which is more responsive is always arguable, the never ending debate of twin vs single will forever go on :P

IMO both will be very similar. GT-SS's have room for i believe a tad more top end, the 3076 a tad more response. However do not take that as signifigant either way. You aren't talking 1000rpm repsonse or 50rwkw extra (for example). It'll be a smidge either way

A .63 rear will limit you to under the 300kw marker, that is not a wise choice in my book given what you want.

I think the major concerns here are how much of either system you have now and how complex the system is later .

The fact that you have the GT3076R and a waste gate means you're a manifold and dump pipe short of a single system .

Should you decide you want to play around with things afterwards the single system would be cheaper and easier because theres one of everything and most of it is easy to get at .

If you were only going to pull it down once and you knew your turbo choice was going to be correct forever for you then maybe the twins would be the go .

"Response" is subjective because so much depends on the spec and condition of the engine as well as how well its tuned .

Personally I'd be trying to get the engine build/spec the best it can be for what you want and add turbo/s as the afterthought .

I don't know why but at times people like to think that there is some mythical magic turbocharger that is going to be supremely powerful everywhere and its not the case .

The bottom line is you can't have boost at low revs and expect it not to run out of gas flow and choke off in the upper rev ranges . The problem is that GTRs are heavy cars and the low compression ratio 2558cc engine doesn't make sufficient torque at low revs to lug it around like say a 4+ litre V8 could .

Turbocharging works but the limited capacity/mass means you need some revs to get it happening .

In short , needs 3L so the engine can do more lugging before boost is made . For anything less size the turbos so the engine makes torque where its needed and accept it won't do moonshot revs .

Also from what I've seen with single GT3582Rs and externals on RB26's you may need to rethink the 44mm gate .

One fella I know found that once he put a free flowing 3 1/2" exhaust on his car the 44mm waste gate no longer coped and he had to have a 50mm one fitted to his 6Boost manifold .

Your call but big pipes behind turbos at the front of the exhaust system is a must to have it spin up as soon as possible .

My old L Series subaru made a huge difference when its turbo outlet pipe was changed to 3" and this is a turbo Garret rates at 260 Hp - 47mm turbine outlet hole . I would want a minimum of 3 1/2' if at all possible out of a GT3076R , it can step down in stages further back when the gas has cooled and "contracted" and you can do the muffling at whatever size you want back there . Very little if any sound penalty when the pipes are hugeish at the front only . Makes a significant difference turbine response and engine power wise .

More coffee now , cheers A .

I think the major concerns here are how much of either system you have now and how complex the system is later .

The fact that you have the GT3076R and a waste gate means you're a manifold and dump pipe short of a single system .

Should you decide you want to play around with things afterwards the single system would be cheaper and easier because theres one of everything and most of it is easy to get at .

I was under the impression that the twin's would be bolt on (well. fiddle, curse, and bolt, on. but bolt on none the less)

Well you said close to 350rwkw, 330rwkw is close in my book. GT-SS's and a GT3076 are similar in output and both should be making 330rwkw on around 20psi.

Every motor is different as is the build, and they are all factors.

Which is more responsive is always arguable, the never ending debate of twin vs single will forever go on :P

IMO both will be very similar. GT-SS's have room for i believe a tad more top end, the 3076 a tad more response. However do not take that as signifigant either way. You aren't talking 1000rpm repsonse or 50rwkw extra (for example). It'll be a smidge either way

A .63 rear will limit you to under the 300kw marker, that is not a wise choice in my book given what you want.

tnx for the info. im gonna go along with GT-SS & dont wanna pass 350rwkw mark as only got 264 cams and factory internals. im happy with 300-330kw. cheers sam

Edited by newlife
I think the major concerns here are how much of either system you have now and how complex the system is later .

The fact that you have the GT3076R and a waste gate means you're a manifold and dump pipe short of a single system .

Should you decide you want to play around with things afterwards the single system would be cheaper and easier because theres one of everything and most of it is easy to get at .

If you were only going to pull it down once and you knew your turbo choice was going to be correct forever for you then maybe the twins would be the go .

"Response" is subjective because so much depends on the spec and condition of the engine as well as how well its tuned .

Personally I'd be trying to get the engine build/spec the best it can be for what you want and add turbo/s as the afterthought .

I don't know why but at times people like to think that there is some mythical magic turbocharger that is going to be supremely powerful everywhere and its not the case .

The bottom line is you can't have boost at low revs and expect it not to run out of gas flow and choke off in the upper rev ranges . The problem is that GTRs are heavy cars and the low compression ratio 2558cc engine doesn't make sufficient torque at low revs to lug it around like say a 4+ litre V8 could .

Turbocharging works but the limited capacity/mass means you need some revs to get it happening .

In short , needs 3L so the engine can do more lugging before boost is made . For anything less size the turbos so the engine makes torque where its needed and accept it won't do moonshot revs .

Also from what I've seen with single GT3582Rs and externals on RB26's you may need to rethink the 44mm gate .

One fella I know found that once he put a free flowing 3 1/2" exhaust on his car the 44mm waste gate no longer coped and he had to have a 50mm one fitted to his 6Boost manifold .

Your call but big pipes behind turbos at the front of the exhaust system is a must to have it spin up as soon as possible .

My old L Series subaru made a huge difference when its turbo outlet pipe was changed to 3" and this is a turbo Garret rates at 260 Hp - 47mm turbine outlet hole . I would want a minimum of 3 1/2' if at all possible out of a GT3076R , it can step down in stages further back when the gas has cooled and "contracted" and you can do the muffling at whatever size you want back there . Very little if any sound penalty when the pipes are hugeish at the front only . Makes a significant difference turbine response and engine power wise .

More coffee now , cheers A .

tnx for genuine advice mate. gonna go with twins. i was worring about the size of the waste gate as well. i think twins would be the go. cheers sam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The German place in Cabramatta was rock solid, fresh pretzel cooked to order back then. Then it went all quiet, after all the poker machines were removed, then I believe it closed for good. I did drive past the other week and noticed outdoor lighting a big screen, but no idea what is there now.  
    • Yeah I suspect even if you hold airmass per cycle/cylinder constant if you get too far away from stock you're still going to have problems running the factory tune within the bounds of the factory load scale. Cams, different displacement/rod ratio, etc. I'm just lucky that the GTIII-SS with wastegate boost + CA compliance cats is pretty much equivalent to stock turbos. When I have actual space I can finally get it tuned and modify the fuel system for flex fuel to 100% handle any detonation concerns when cranking the boost to whatever those dinky turbos can put out.
    • I would say no, why, because my daughter, who also lives in Goulburn, hasn't recommended us going there Pity, as we miss all the German joints around in Sydney, actually, the restaurants are the only thing I really miss about Sydney, and a special mention to Ishibanboshi at Bondi Junction, their Kara-age Don is heart cloggingly deliciousness (always added a special boiled egg...or 2) 😋 
    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around without a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
×
×
  • Create New...