Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For those that don't know, keep in mind you can not opt out of SPYNET when you use MSE!!!! Microsoft or anyone telling you that you can only do it there way is just not on in my opinion!

Just another reason i would never use it.. Invasive!!!!! And they do say that they may (accidently 'yea right') recover personal information. including where the information is stored on your HDD etc.

LINK TO REVIEW

Remember my friends the best of anything is never free...

Edited by 99 GTT
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SpyNet -

Basic submits to Microsoft the detected software's origins, your response to it and whether that action was successful

Advanced membership submits all that plus the location on your hard drive of the software in question, how it operates, and how it has impacted your computer

Meh to that really.

Both basic and advanced warn users that personal data might be "accidentally" sent to Microsoft, although they promise to neither identify nor contact you

And meh to that, considering what Google has been upto over the last 18 months that is excessively worse.

Remember spynet will only be reporting if you get infected. Not like I'm looking at kiddie porn or trawling the depths of the hacker universe :P

:D Well so much for my new 2nd hand flaptop it's away at the fixers with its newly installed Kaspersky and WTFKs whatever else is on there for a hard drive total wipe and basics reinstall as apparently three and a half hours to do a scan is far from normal unless you have a drive the size of NASAs.

You'd have to think I'd have learn't by now, don't buy cheap stuff from a mates mate, just because they're a mates mate, no matter how good they recon it is.

:)

Edited by BASHO
avg is a POS IMO, too many false positives and dosen't actually pick up the farken trojans!

a mix of Malwarebytes and a-squared does it for me

+1 for Malwarebytes its a brilliant program thats got me out of trouble at least a half dozen times.

Avira AntiVir personally.

Regularly updated, very low memory footprint, not many false positives, unintrusive, and best of all... free. Does come up with a nag screen when you update, but if you use windows to deny running of notify.exe (or make it run minimised) it stops popping up.

AVG is OK too, but its a little too cautious for my liking, and pretty crap at detecting even kiddie scripts.

i use avast. it is good. ran it on my mothers boyfriends computer which was running some other one (not sure if it was AVG or norton or mcafee) and it picked up 4 viruses when doing a boot scan.

QFT - best free vscanner I have ever used and I have been using for nearly 4 years with 0 problems uncleaned...

I use it with Comodo firewall... for security firewall and added protection runtime

hardware firewall won't stop your computer sending out information or using port 80, 22 etc, which is how most trojans work these days... they're intelligent enough to tunnel out, and then transfer whatever they need in or out.

  • 2 weeks later...

Norton is just pure rubbish and a resource hog,

Use NOD32, its got a 30 day free day trail, and if runs out just buy it ? or reinstall it to restart the trail again.

I've been using it for a number of years now and its never let me down thus far, so its one anti virus i can vouch for!

:blush: I'm plugging along with Kaspersky, it updates regularly dosen't seem to resource hungry, only cost $90 for 3 installs, is good for 2 years and so far it seem to have dealt harshly with anything it hasn't liked.

The standard for most desktops out there is usually Symantec, Trend and McAffee - Which tend to take alot of resource and I'm not a fan of their consoles - but have to admit Symantec beats the rest for ease of deployment.

"Microsoft Security Essentials" is the best all round - it's free if you have legit Windows from XP SP2 onwards.

Excludes all Windows Server versions - So don't waste your time - I already tried :happy:

What I like about it is that it integrates properly with Windows - being a Microsoft product.

Uses minimal memory and updates via Windows update - it's just "easy" for any noob and very fool proof - some people may dis-agree with me - but because its so light weight and un-intrusive - you will not have issues with end users always trying to disable the whole lot - instead it is kind of modular you an set exceptions (which I found I never had to do).

I had to "acid" test Microsoft Security Essentials for my workplace and for some of our clients (I'm a Systems Engineer).

I can definately say MSE beats the other AVs for locked files and deep registry infections.

The only issue is that installation is quite manual (not centralized like Symantec) - It doesn't have a console and is not yet recognised by many large companies.

You can get the MSE in the flavours below.

XP SP2+ (32-bit only)

Vista (32-bit and 64-bit)

Windows 7 (32-bit and 64-bit)

Fingers crossed Microsoft will not make future versions of MSE bloated.

Key example is AVG - It used to be light now it just sucks ;)

I use SEP at work, it goes alright, would never touch their home products again though.

McAfee is f**king useless fyi.

I've yet to see anything which can't be cured with AVG/SEP + malwarebytes, apart from a few incredibly nasty infections that warranted hard disk removal for scanning the registry. On a corporate machine we'd of course merely SCCM / WDS it.

Agreed with above, i have used many different AV's over the years, NOD32 is the one that has always done its job the way i want it to. Its customizable to the way you want it to run, scans constantly to keep your computer safe.

I use version 2.7 still which comes with all in built necessities (AMON - File System Monitor, DMON - Microsoft Office Document Monitor, EMON Email Monitor - and IMON - Internet Monitor) All these combined run at around no more than 2200kb.

Honestly it has been the He-man of AV's for me. And probably the only thing i would ever register to pay for without me saying, "why would i waste money on crap?"

If you want something free, go with AVG i guess. But that didn't protect me as well as NOD32.

Good luck =]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...