Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i read a post on the zed forums about suspension setup for drags (by a guy who ran 10.95 with stock turbos and engine) who said to run stock shocks/springs on the front and put higher damping on the rear since when the rear squats it induces negative camber and toe (it has something to do with the IRS and antisquat geometry, i am not too sure exactly) which reduces your tyre contact area. i had always though soft rear was best for drags but pretty much every other zed guy i have spoken to has said the same thing as this guy and said they ran better times that way. i figured r32 and z32 may have similar rear suspension setup.

anyway back on topic, yes you should go to calder ric. i would like to race again but the clutch did not like 4500rpm launches and it was still bogging down so need to upgrade clutch before I go again.

Just chuck a turbo back exhaust on it i recon, the rims are ok, maybe a pod / larger fmic if needed? and up the boost a bit for the drags.. would be nice :D

Do you have semi slicks / slicks for your r32? i assume so by looking at your sig

Yeah I run semi's on the 32 for circuit work.

It's quite suprising but standard exhaust is good for 320rwkw's apparently. Cat would probably have to change I imagine.

Sandeep. Drags is all about weight transfer but if that weight transfer causes negative camber then that's a problem. Standard susp is pretty good for 1/4 mile stuff.

(by a guy who ran 10.95 with stock turbos and engine)

I Highly doubt that!

i read a post on the zed forums about suspension setup for drags (by a guy who ran 10.95 with stock turbos and engine) who said to run stock shocks/springs on the front and put higher damping on the rear since when the rear squats it induces negative camber and toe (it has something to do with the IRS and antisquat geometry, i am not too sure exactly) which reduces your tyre contact area. i had always though soft rear was best for drags but pretty much every other zed guy i have spoken to has said the same thing as this guy and said they ran better times that way. i figured r32 and z32 may have similar rear suspension setup.

Exactly why you don't listen to everything you read on the forums...get your rear geometry right to account for some of the negative camber on the squat and have soft rears to get the weight transfer towards the back...a zed is a car like any other...the laws of physics still apply to it...

Baha some of the stuff on the zed forums is bloody funny to read :)

Yes softer is better as prevously mentioned, and if you have adjustable UCAs, running positive camber is the way to go to account for dynamic camber on squat.

I cant wait to put some softer springs in and slide some slicks on, try and hit the 10 bracket :P

Yeah man. Is yours auto or man?

I ended up with the auto. I wanted a manual but after taking an auto for a test drive just for comparisons sake, I was hooked. They are so damn good!

Did you try using the launch control at all?

I ended up with the auto. I wanted a manual but after taking an auto for a test drive just for comparisons sake, I was hooked. They are so damn good!

Did you try using the launch control at all?

Yeah launch control every time. holds 3600 rpm.

Even though it's known as a launch control it's more of a static rev limit coz when you go over 10kph it disengages and you wheel spin starts. At calder I didn't have much of an issue with wheel spin coz it's pretty grippy.

Yeah launch control every time. holds 3600 rpm.

Even though it's known as a launch control it's more of a static rev limit coz when you go over 10kph it disengages and you wheel spin starts. At calder I didn't have much of an issue with wheel spin coz it's pretty grippy.

Ah yeah, I wasn't too sure on how it worked. Auto ones don't have LC. They just get a nice crackle throught the exhaust when you change gears. It's rather addictive actually :)

Definatly keen on taking it down to the next meet. A stock auto one running high 12's is very encouraging.

i read a post on the zed forums about suspension setup for drags (by a guy who ran 10.95 with stock turbos and engine) who said to run stock shocks/springs on the front and put higher damping on the rear since when the rear squats it induces negative camber and toe (it has something to do with the IRS and antisquat geometry, i am not too sure exactly) which reduces your tyre contact area. i had always though soft rear was best for drags but pretty much every other zed guy i have spoken to has said the same thing as this guy and said they ran better times that way. i figured r32 and z32 may have similar rear suspension setup.

anyway back on topic, yes you should go to calder ric. i would like to race again but the clutch did not like 4500rpm launches and it was still bogging down so need to upgrade clutch before I go again.

What the Fuck?!

I assume they are talking about a Z32..?

A stock Z32 can run a 10.95 with modified rear suspension?

:)

I would like to see the quarter mile time sheet.

stock unopened engine and turbos but more boost, tuned + bolt on mods. did some more reading and turns out he was running 80 shot of Nos too which i didn't know before. still an impressive time though, best stock turbo/stock engine zed i can find in australia is high 11's without nos. and yeah have been doing more reading and all the guys who drag zeds say to run stiffer on the rear. i think it is more due to the design of the irs on the zed which is not suited to drag racing, not just camber on squat like femno said but also toe changes. and yeah as limpus said you can change the mounting points for the control arms to fix this, which is what UAS have been doing, but pretty expensive so I guess this is why everyone just ups the damping on the rear.

What the Fuck?!

I assume they are talking about a Z32..?

A stock Z32 can run a 10.95 with modified rear suspension?

:)

I would like to see the quarter mile time sheet.

stock unopened engine and turbos but more boost, tuned + bolt on mods. did some more reading and turns out he was running 80 shot of Nos too which i didn't know before. still an impressive time though, best stock turbo/stock engine zed i can find in australia is high 11's without nos. and yeah have been doing more reading and all the guys who drag zeds say to run stiffer on the rear. i think it is more due to the design of the irs on the zed which is not suited to drag racing, not just camber on squat like femno said but also toe changes. and yeah as limpus said you can change the mounting points for the control arms to fix this, which is what UAS have been doing, but pretty expensive so I guess this is why everyone just ups the damping on the rear.

I see...

The VG30DETT had more potential then I thought.

Well at least you cleared that up :)

LOL! @ NOS.

You don't need that Sandeep.

Yeah launch control every time. holds 3600 rpm.

Even though it's known as a launch control it's more of a static rev limit coz when you go over 10kph it disengages and you wheel spin starts. At calder I didn't have much of an issue with wheel spin coz it's pretty grippy.

Hey buddy,

Good to see you have tried the XR6 at Calder, I have a manual FG XR6 Turbo ute as well, the launch control is sooo good but I am having the same problem as you. It launches really well but as soon as it gets going it starts to spin the wheels in the mid rpm range.

Even second gear is a little tail happy unless you ease it into gear.

Hey buddy,

Good to see you have tried the XR6 at Calder, I have a manual FG XR6 Turbo ute as well, the launch control is sooo good but I am having the same problem as you. It launches really well but as soon as it gets going it starts to spin the wheels in the mid rpm range.

Even second gear is a little tail happy unless you ease it into gear.

Haha. So many FG's! post up a pic

this is mine.

post-10715-1271770949_thumb.jpg

I love the colour!

They are all good colours! The lux pack 19's are nice too but I couldn't justify the extra considering I would probably change em anyway.

Where did you get yours? Strapp ford? Our number plates are only 6 numbers apart!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...