Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, ok so my r33 has a 400r frontbar in which the blinkers are in the kit itself, the previous owner disconnected the blinkers on the lights in order to wire up the front bar blinkers, this has lead to the car thinking 2 bulbs are busted and giving me that insanely annoying quick blinker, ok now the question i want to ask you gurus, is their any way to disable this quick blinker system at all (its pointless having it on anyway seeing as even if their was a light out somewere i wouldn't know because its constantly on the quick blinker) cheers guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317059-fast-blinker-flash/
Share on other sites

One possibility is that the incorrect wattage of bulb has been used.

The fast blink is not so fast that you can't see the lights "on/off". And I think if you use "hazard", the lights blink at "normal" rate.

yes, try using your hazards and they will blink at normal rate (even if you ever did have a bulb out). You should look into the wattage of the bulb first and secondly make sure that the wireing is not twist and tape and is terminals in heat shrink or somthing similar.

As Basti said, the circuit is looking at resistance, and you have half as much as you need. An inline resistor should fix the problem, but I don't know off the top of my head how much you'll need.

At a guess, i'd say you could measure the resistance of one of your bulbs (multimeter on positive and negative of globe, which you take out to test), and then buy two resistors of that value and then wire them inline somewhere. (one for left, one for right)

Replace the flasher can (relay) with one that will work for LED's and you shouldn't have a problem. Something like this. (This may the incorrect pin configuration, so please check first)

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/12V-LED-FLASHER-CAN...=item1c11be6b29

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...