Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sigh... typed this out then hit back on my mouse :D

Well, as the topic title says im looking to get 200hp out of my rb25de, why? well i want to :P

So about my car, it has been on the dyno before and put out 161.9hp. That was with DK&E extractors, 2.5" exhaust, no idea what cat and a dirty cheap muffler.

Now the car has an Apexi pod filter with heatsheild and piping going up through the new hole i drilled :( Has also had a new exhaust system put in thanks to being rear ended, its still 2.5" but now has a 100cell cat and a Varex cannon. After these mods the car now feels more responsive and fells like it has more power.

Will testing its power this weekend on a dyno to see where im at again.

So what i am thinking of doing to get the extra 40hp is - Variable Cam gear for exhaust side - Head Port and Polish - Advance the ignition timing - and a 300zx ecu with a Nistune chip

Why get the 300zx with Nistune? Well nistune doesnt work with R33na ecu's so to keep the VCT which i prefer to have you have to get the 300zx ecu.

I dont think Nistune has been used on many NA engines so it will be interesting to see what i can get out of it. My tuner said he did get 33hp out of a rb30 using it so hopefully i can get something like that figure.

Main thing i need to work out is head port and polish, some people say DIY others say it should only be around $300 others say $600, im not too sure maybe it not worth doing it.

So yea, just looking for your advice, and what power gains you have gotten out of this stuff.

And don't say get a turbo... as you can see all these mods apart from the port and polish could bolt straight onto a turbo motor... ive thought some of it through :D

Thanks for any help/advice :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317633-200hp-rb25-possible/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

how much you will get out of a nistune will depend on how your car is running now. i think you would be pushing it to get that much out of a natro rb25 from just an ecu (i know people who only got about 25hp from putting a pfc on a turbo rb25) . i would expect to see about a 15hp, give or take a few hp. if you were getting the tune done after adding some mods then you may see a better gain from just a tune though. i know that on an sr20de you will generally gain about 10 to 15hp just from a tune. the rb30 ecu is somewhat more primitive than the rb25, so there are more possibilities of gains from it than there is from the newer, smarter ecu.

and i agree with zebra on getting cams. you sure as hell won't make 200hp on the stock cams.

that first 20 to 25hp should be easy to get. a set of cams and a nistune should do that comfortably. the next 15 to 20hp will take a bit more work. headwork and intake

Yea, id be putting on the Cam gear and doing the port and polish before the tune is done. Id be using the 300zx ecu i don't know if that's a 'smarter' ecu than the 25de one.

+ Your talking about putting in new camshafts yea? They would be a bit too much for my pretty small wallet ><

Main thing im wondering about is the port and polish, think i would just get a light one done or maybe get some second hand heads and practice it myself.

cams will set you back about $1000, and i would put them in before doing a port and polish. also if you have a pretty small wallet then i would be setting your power goal at about 180hp as that extra 20hp to get to 200 will cost a few thousand dollars.

also while you have the head off i would get it machined/shaved to raise the compression a touch.

I'm sorry to go against the grain, but I would skip the port and polish, the ports are easily large enough for the 2.5L, any boring or polishing (esp without the intake manifold matched) will be negligible. so many people incorporate it in builds (which is fair enough in a full high power build), but as a single modification I see so many dyno at a power level (lets say 110kW) spend $1g on a 3way P&P and end up with 112kW, I think the money is much better spent elsewhere first, then do the P&P once its the next most efficient power per dollar mod.

To make that power, I would aim for revs and compression. You can regrind your cams for around $500 to what I have in my RB30DE (which made >200hp, but of course 3L) which are surecam 8.3/255's (and you can keep VCT, maybe change the swap over though). Or you could spend the money saved on headwork on some aftermarkets, there are basic 8.5/256's for <$900, I'm not sure how much lift you can have before needing to machine the buckets, maybe around 9?

Next is compression, compression makes power, but too much ruins drivability from needing to use better fuel or having to reduce timing etc, If you were to bump it up from 10:1 to ~ 11:1 and then get it tuned, i think that would make a nice improvement.

You sort of need to research yourself, but these need to all be done at once, you should match your cams with your intake manifold and your exhaust manifold. You can find calculators on the net which you enter your engine specs (bore/stroke/cam profile/valve sizes etc) and where you want your peak torque (the higher your torque peak the more peak power you will have) if you can then find (off the shelf front facing) or make a manifold to suit, with the cams and adj cam gears you can match these, to push your power up higher in the revs (which translates to you making more power) if all this is done correctly, the power shouldn’t be too hard to make. People tend to struggle when they just throw random parts together which aren’t matched.

So yeah, in summary, in my opinion, get meaty cams, and increase your compression then tune it, this can definitely get you your power, but to maintain drivability you may limit yourself to less compression/milder cams, to which you should increase efficiency's elsewhere (like correctly matched intake manifold, tb(s) and intake piping). With cams, you may also want to look into a larger throttle body (easy with a new plenum) OR twin throttle body’s.

Edited by SKiT_R31
I'm sorry to go against the grain, but I would skip the port and polish, the ports are easily large enough for the 2.5L, any boring or polishing (esp without the intake manifold matched) will be negligible. so many people incorporate it in builds (which is fair enough in a full high power build), but as a single modification I see so many dyno at a power level (lets say 110kW) spend $1g on a 3way P&P and end up with 112kW, I think the money is much better spent elsewhere first, then do the P&P once its the next most efficient power per dollar mod.

To make that power, I would aim for revs and compression. You can regrind your cams for around $500 to what I have in my RB30DE (which made >200hp, but of course 3L) which are surecam 8.3/255's (and you can keep VCT, maybe change the swap over though). Or you could spend the money saved on headwork on some aftermarkets, there are basic 8.5/256's for <$900, I'm not sure how much lift you can have before needing to machine the buckets, maybe around 9?

Next is compression, compression makes power, but too much ruins drivability from needing to use better fuel or having to reduce timing etc, If you were to bump it up from 10:1 to ~ 11:1 and then get it tuned, i think that would make a nice improvement.

You sort of need to research yourself, but these need to all be done at once, you should match your cams with your intake manifold and your exhaust manifold. You can find calculators on the net which you enter your engine specs (bore/stroke/cam profile/valve sizes etc) and where you want your peak torque (the higher your torque peak the more peak power you will have) if you can then find (off the shelf front facing) or make a manifold to suit, with the cams and adj cam gears you can match these, to push your power up higher in the revs (which translates to you making more power) if all this is done correctly, the power shouldn’t be too hard to make. People tend to struggle when they just throw random parts together which aren’t matched.

So yeah, in summary, in my opinion, get meaty cams, and increase your compression then tune it, this can definitely get you your power, but to maintain drivability you may limit yourself to less compression/milder cams, to which you should increase efficiency's elsewhere (like correctly matched intake manifold, tb(s) and intake piping). With cams, you may also want to look into a larger throttle body (easy with a new plenum) OR twin throttle body’s.

x2

+

Have a look at twin NA 300zx throttle bodies adapted to your origional plenum- Extrude hone and port matched manifold. Re-grind cams, good exhaust and a re-tune.

Even still it's alot of work for a small gain.

J.

x2

+

Have a look at twin NA 300zx throttle bodies adapted to your origional plenum- Extrude hone and port matched manifold. Re-grind cams, good exhaust and a re-tune.

Even still it's alot of work for a small gain.

J.

I thought 300zx throttle bodies weren't that big? How about some a VH45 throttle body? Also, not sure if I've missed it, but does the OP want 200hp at the wheels or at the fly?

Yea, its 161.9hp atrw

post-63710-1271991144_thumb.jpg

Think i will just be getting the exhaust side cam gear and the Nistune for the moment, and maybe regrind the cams, (who can i talk to in brisbane for a quote?)

Ive had the car for about 6 months and im trying not to sink too much money into it (other than mods that can be crossed over to a turbo system)

Can do further mods to it down the track if i feel the need, but for now i think i will do the tune and camgear - jave to do more research on cams

if you are planing on going turbo down the track i wouldn't really do too much to it at all. just do cheap easy mods. then when you plan to go turbo sell the car and buy a GTS-t as that is much cheaper than building a turbo NA, and you get the added bonus of LSD and bigger braker and stronger gearbox.

dont get caught up thinking a $50 cam gear is gunna get u more power.... u might see 2 or 3 hp if your tuner knows what hes doing with it......all the gears do is move your torque curve around within the rev range.

i also agree with mad082, save the cash, buy a turbs model later.

some tips int he mean time..... go find a good quality "cylinder head cleaner" and follow the instructions, if your intake/valves are slightly gummed up u might actually squeeze alittle power of it by simply giving it a clean. and if u dont, it costs like $20 or $30 bucks.....

put good fuel in it, and advance the timing abit with a timing light and make sure it doesnt knock.

if you can do the work yourself, pull out your injectors and get them cleaned, at $120 for a set cleaned and flow tested, u may be surprised.

get a good airfilter, pods arnt "better", infact most of them are worse. get a good quality DRY air filter. if its oiled, u may contaminate your AFM.

if you are planing on going turbo down the track i wouldn't really do too much to it at all. just do cheap easy mods. then when you plan to go turbo sell the car and buy a GTS-t as that is much cheaper than building a turbo NA, and you get the added bonus of LSD and bigger braker and stronger gearbox.

Yea i have been thinking along these lines, the mods that i have been buying/planning to buy can all be swapped over to a turbo engine (camgear, nistune, strutbars, coilovers etc)

Makes sense in my mind.

just looking at that graph, is it best to change gears when you hit your peak rpm? i.e on that graph 5200rpm or just carry on and shift just b4 red line?

In terms of whats fastest it would be best to change after peak power, when the power output drops to equal what the power output will be in next gear at the lower rpm I think

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...