Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So what your saying is that ben will help SAU members out and give them a discount but SAU vic will not help ben out and send work his way at a non discounted rate?
Also i notice that no one is mentioning his price, so in the end you HAVE to join SAU vic to get his number to find out what his price is, im not a trusting person and all of this sounds like the ground work for a scam.

Oh now now... A scam? Please. We are protecting an arrangement that we have organised for CLUB MEMBERS.

Hell members are posting up themselves saying how good the value is. If you need more proof then well you'll never get it.

If i told you all the details... what will stop you going to him and saying "I'm a memeber"? When you really aren't? :(

If you think it's all some big conspiracy/scam/whatever then just go to any retail alarm installer and pay full price that way. They are all around the same give/take.

tufff thanks charles.. will join the club soon :rofl:

Lol np. Just to clear things up, I'm only giving you the info you wanted, not trying to con you into a little "scam" as someone suggested.

At the end of the day, it is up to you to take that advice or not :P

Also i notice that no one is mentioning his price, so in the end you HAVE to join SAU vic to get his number to find out what his price is, im not a trusting person and all of this sounds like the ground work for a scam.

I paid approx $250 from memory for a fully installed alarm on a 1996 Ford Falcon, I believe this may have included a battery backup add-on as well.

The car did not have an alarm, and I'm unsure what the price would be for a skyline.

EDIT: the membership price for SAU would offset the price to get an alarm at this price. Also note that I bought the plain alarm system, nothing fancy.

I paid approx $250 from memory for a fully installed alarm on a 1996 Ford Falcon, I believe this may have included a battery backup add-on as well.

The car did not have an alarm, and I'm unsure what the price would be for a skyline.

Now that wasn't so difficult? Thanks for that info.

  • 2 weeks later...

Well then does he install the Mongoose alarm with 3 point immobilizer, alarm, supersonic sensor, battery back up siren? Or is there a better one he does?

(Quote from Stylyn audio: $599 installed)

Edited by TyresBro
Well then does he install the Mongoose alarm with 3 point immobilizer, alarm, supersonic sensor, battery back up siren? Or is there a better one he does?

(Quote from Stylyn audio: $599 installed)

which stylin, friend of a friend manages one.

which stylin, friend of a friend manages one.

"http://www.stylyn.com/

Stylyn- Focal, MB Quartz, RockFord Fosgate, Alpine, ALARMS etc

268 Dorset Rd, Boronia - (03) 9739 8866" (Local Wreckers And Workshops thread)

Just called the number and got a quick quote cause didn't know much about alarms lol. Said he was doing one on a Subaru Liberty at the time and could do one for me for $599 (doesn't sound too cheap for some reason heh).

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...