Jump to content
SAU Community

Atr43ss-2 Prototype Initial Tune 250rwkws 18psi<2500rpm, Stupidly Responsive


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Here's the link of the video footage:

On road for normal driving its good, feels like always on boost. Once floored just wheel spin every where. 2nd Gear wheel spin from 3500RPM all the way to 7000RPM. Good responsive street turbo.

To bolton to stock setup need 2x slicon hoses, Exhaust and manifold plus lines bolton, can be high flowed into stock turbo.

Car's got 800cc injectors, Z32 AFM, FMIC, Exhaust, Clutch, BOV, Nistune chip.

what can you put together for a VL Berlina turbo that will bolt on...lines mani etc.

mint car that needs to look absolutely unmodified.

pm or post here.

Edited by Swiper the Fox

the boost looks like it drops down to around 14.5psi from 18psi ..... if you could some how get it holding 18psi to redline, im sure it would make more power....

also notced youve lost a bit of the bottom of the graph.... would love to see the bottom end of the power curve

What's special about this compared to ur normal ATR43?? what's different about it?

Yeah im curious about specs of this turbo aswell, what makes it so special to spool up and be on boost that early and that hard, yet still make allright top end?

Edited by PM-R33

This turbo was engineered for max street driving ability. Its more of a independent turbo that has no shared features to all other ATR43 models.

We've also done some testing on it using different actuators and settings with wastegate controller. I will discuss that in my thread lateron this evening.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...