Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

We're getting there, worked out that we have around $1000 in prizes to give away to participants.

Attendance update

ACT Supra Club

1. Ross (Paid)

2. Lawndart (pending car)

3. Niko (Paid)

4. Yiannis (Paid)

5. Andy (lippy84) (Paid)

6. Simon (Foxxy) (Paid)

7. Teon (Paid)

8. Jazz (Paid)

9. Andrew (yjz-70t) (Paid)

10. Sam G (spunky)

11. Nathan R

12. Chris (CDM)

13. Ballzy (Paid)

14. Niran

15.

Skyline Owners

1. Kat (Paid)

2. naughtyruski (Paid)

3. sl33py (Paid)

4. Donnan (Paid)

5. Cejay (Paid)

6. GT-R32 (Paid)

7. A20089 (Paid)

8. GT-R32 (No.2) (Paid $60)

9. RandomIAm (Paid)

10. GJ Samson (Paid)

what are the odds being offered for a winner?

Winner of what?? The ACT Supra club have trophies organised for our financial members. The prizes offered at this stage are listed within this thread and I'm sure every participant will walk away with something, be it one of the vouchers or a cap.

We are thinking of making the major prize for a kw per litre type thing, but that's to be finalised.

poor form!!

Dynoing my car to see how much power I don't have so I wont use it and not have a great time driving it, sounds heaps more fun than a DRIVING event :D

but seriously I will drop in, but there is no point in running my car, I can tell you it has 135kw from the last dyno run

Hi all

If there is anyone that is still intending on participating, please make payment by this Thursday 3 June, otherwise you will have pay on the day. As soon as we reach 30 participants then you might miss out.

Entrant list

ACT Supra Club

1. Ross (Paid)

2. Ballzy (Paid)

3. Niko (Paid)

4. Yiannis (Paid)

5. Andy (lippy84) (Paid)

6. Simon (Foxxy) (Paid)

7. Teon (Paid)

8. Jazz (Paid)

9. Andrew (yjz-70t) (Paid)

10. Sam G (spunky)

11. Niran

12. Chris (CDM)

13. Naz

14.

15.

Skyline Owners

1. Kat (Paid)

2. naughtyruski (Paid)

3. sl33py (Paid)

4. Donnan (Paid)

5. Cejay (Paid)

6. GT-R32 (Paid)

7. A20089 (Paid)

8. GT-R32 (No.2) (Paid $60)

9. RandomIAm (Paid)

10. GJ Samson (Paid)

11. JD R33 (Paid)

Is the motorkhana at sutton for the mg car club ?? I think there was one in june.

Mate, you might be better off sending a PM to Turismo as I had no idea there was a motorkhana on until late last week. We tried to have a look at what events were on back in mid January and there was nothing on. If I knew the khana was on, I would have changed the date as I would have like to participated as well.

I'm sure there's a dedicated thread for it as well somewhere...

Edited by RP071

Yeah it is on. There usually is no outside advertising for the motorkhana, its only on the mg website, and I find out but usually forget (to lazy) to do anything about it til the month before.

I will come and say hi at lunch though

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...