Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have seen this in other places as well, supercheap to be exact, but it's what it says in the ryco booklet.

they say for the RB25DE(T) to have a Z442 or something if it's made after '98. and it is that much smaller (smaller than the one for my house-mates 2.2L camry engine).

now, i only have a R33, so i would be saying stick with the Z145A, which is what i use. and i would say that you should use the same for the R34 as well.

a larger filter should have a higher flow than a smaller one (based on larger cross-section of filter). so i would say that maybe the Z442 or whatever is more expensive and they are trying to get money out of you, or the guy just doesn't know what he's on about. but if anyone else can have some logic over why a smaller one would be better, i would like to hear it.

Hey mate,

I use a Z442 on my R34 RB25DET, Here in New Zealand the recommended filter for most rb's are the Z101 but the Z101 doesnt fit on the 25 on the 34's I cant remember exactally what it is but it hits on something so the smaller filter is perfect.

Dunno what the difference is but I would go for the one that's specific to your vehicle model why risk using something else?

RB30, RB20, RB26, RB26 all can use the Z145A oil filter.

Its a 3/4 thread oil filter.

The Z442 is the same kind of 3/4 oil filter but smaller, I use the Z442 on my R33 because I have an adapter that goes to the oil cooler, therefore a Z145A does not fit in there.

I would assume the larger oil filter is preferable...

the 34's use a slightly different filter cos there is something down there that fouls on some models

if its a 33, stick with the bigger filter, if its a 34, you can try a 33 filter and if it clears then use it cos they are cheaper and bigger = more surface area and flow/restriction

i've got a stagea with the neo motor and 4wd shiz and i've got the 33 filter on it

the 33 filter is also cheaper too

exactly what i was going to say, larger area means either more flow (which means less pressure is required to force the oil through the filter) or more filtration potential for the filter, or most likely a combination of the two.

interesting that they both fit. the bigger one has the potential to be better filter but as said above there may be situations where it doesn't work on the car.

i was given one of the bigger ones by someone who didn't know what he was doing at nissan (urgh) but it worked fine. sump plug washer i bought was way too big tho

  • 4 weeks later...
Ah I'm an idiot.

I use Z145a's on my 25 neo (in R32)

i know this is a bit late but it doesn't matter

both filters have the same dimensions on the face of the filter, the body is just a bit bigger on the 33 one which can foul on some 34 motors (but haven't heard of anyone having troubles)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...