Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The front mount will be fine. Doesn't really have any effect on your emissions.

RED513 is right on the money. Cat and o2 sensor checks and you'll be right to go.

Unless you have drastically changed the amount of fuel (injectors) or air (turbo), then you have no need for an aftermarket ecu. (for emissions, of course. Always power benefits from a tune! :rofl2:)

The front mount will be fine. Doesn't really have any effect on your emissions.

RED513 is right on the money. Cat and o2 sensor checks and you'll be right to go.

Unless you have drastically changed the amount of fuel (injectors) or air (turbo), then you have no need for an aftermarket ecu. (for emissions, of course. Always power benefits from a tune! :rofl2: )

nah only mod is fmic and exhaust had pod but put standard airbox back on

how do i know if the cat thats on there is good enuf

  • 1 month later...

hey guys had car emissions tested and it bombed out real bad so im thinkin of just doing what the tuner said and get the aftermarket ecu but he also said that nistune will not have the paremeters that i need 2 get it to pass

any one know where i can get a power fc

or does any one know anything about microtech as they are in my area and will install 4 1400

nistune and power fc are very similar, just the power fc has more resolution in the maps. nistune will do fuel & ignition, closed loop corrections, after start / cold start and acceleration enrichment, what else do you need to get a good tune to pass emissions. microtech are alright, but its not an ecu i'd be picking, especially for an emissions pass.

Get another tuner! Nistune will tune your engine fine. When you say bombed out on emissions test what was the problem? Do you have any numbers, readout? Did you replace the cat convertor? With an almost standard car its ridiculous to be telling you that you need a Microtech.

Get another tuner! Nistune will tune your engine fine. When you say bombed out on emissions test what was the problem? Do you have any numbers, readout? Did you replace the cat convertor? With an almost standard car its ridiculous to be telling you that you need a Microtech.

ive got a read out here somewhere ill have to scan it and post it and no i didnt change the cat the exhaust place said they only put cats on that meet australian standards and yeah the tuner is saying power fc but i think h just wants to try n make some extra money out of me wants 2 charge me 2500 then tuning on top

try and find out what make the cat is

x-force cats are notorious for their poor performance (both power and emissions wise)

catco and metalcat are supposed to be good tho

and x2 on the nisstune being as good if not better for emissions

have you changed your o2 sensor while you have owned the car? if not, replace it asap its probably the main reason it failed the test cos the ecu can't see how rich its running

Actually a "lean" tune will fail the IM240 test.

The tune must be such that the levels of CO, hydrocarbons, and NOx gasses are all within regulations.

A lean tune will fail just as hard as a rich tune will.

As quoted above, it's not about how filthy rich your tune may be but the gases that are created by the combustion of O2 and fuel.

It is imperative that you have a catalytic converter that is able to convert the gases into other gases that aren't measured in the IM240 test.

This is why decat pipes are illegal and carry a hefty fine for emissions.

hey guys had car emissions tested and it bombed out real bad so im thinkin of just doing what the tuner said and get the aftermarket ecu but he also said that nistune will not have the paremeters that i need 2 get it to pass

any one know where i can get a power fc

or does any one know anything about microtech as they are in my area and will install 4 1400

you know what i think about this bloke man, just get nistune!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...