Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The front mount will be fine. Doesn't really have any effect on your emissions.

RED513 is right on the money. Cat and o2 sensor checks and you'll be right to go.

Unless you have drastically changed the amount of fuel (injectors) or air (turbo), then you have no need for an aftermarket ecu. (for emissions, of course. Always power benefits from a tune! :rofl2:)

The front mount will be fine. Doesn't really have any effect on your emissions.

RED513 is right on the money. Cat and o2 sensor checks and you'll be right to go.

Unless you have drastically changed the amount of fuel (injectors) or air (turbo), then you have no need for an aftermarket ecu. (for emissions, of course. Always power benefits from a tune! :rofl2: )

nah only mod is fmic and exhaust had pod but put standard airbox back on

how do i know if the cat thats on there is good enuf

  • 1 month later...

hey guys had car emissions tested and it bombed out real bad so im thinkin of just doing what the tuner said and get the aftermarket ecu but he also said that nistune will not have the paremeters that i need 2 get it to pass

any one know where i can get a power fc

or does any one know anything about microtech as they are in my area and will install 4 1400

nistune and power fc are very similar, just the power fc has more resolution in the maps. nistune will do fuel & ignition, closed loop corrections, after start / cold start and acceleration enrichment, what else do you need to get a good tune to pass emissions. microtech are alright, but its not an ecu i'd be picking, especially for an emissions pass.

Get another tuner! Nistune will tune your engine fine. When you say bombed out on emissions test what was the problem? Do you have any numbers, readout? Did you replace the cat convertor? With an almost standard car its ridiculous to be telling you that you need a Microtech.

Get another tuner! Nistune will tune your engine fine. When you say bombed out on emissions test what was the problem? Do you have any numbers, readout? Did you replace the cat convertor? With an almost standard car its ridiculous to be telling you that you need a Microtech.

ive got a read out here somewhere ill have to scan it and post it and no i didnt change the cat the exhaust place said they only put cats on that meet australian standards and yeah the tuner is saying power fc but i think h just wants to try n make some extra money out of me wants 2 charge me 2500 then tuning on top

try and find out what make the cat is

x-force cats are notorious for their poor performance (both power and emissions wise)

catco and metalcat are supposed to be good tho

and x2 on the nisstune being as good if not better for emissions

have you changed your o2 sensor while you have owned the car? if not, replace it asap its probably the main reason it failed the test cos the ecu can't see how rich its running

Actually a "lean" tune will fail the IM240 test.

The tune must be such that the levels of CO, hydrocarbons, and NOx gasses are all within regulations.

A lean tune will fail just as hard as a rich tune will.

As quoted above, it's not about how filthy rich your tune may be but the gases that are created by the combustion of O2 and fuel.

It is imperative that you have a catalytic converter that is able to convert the gases into other gases that aren't measured in the IM240 test.

This is why decat pipes are illegal and carry a hefty fine for emissions.

hey guys had car emissions tested and it bombed out real bad so im thinkin of just doing what the tuner said and get the aftermarket ecu but he also said that nistune will not have the paremeters that i need 2 get it to pass

any one know where i can get a power fc

or does any one know anything about microtech as they are in my area and will install 4 1400

you know what i think about this bloke man, just get nistune!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...