Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you can do the same thing with a MAP sensor, I tune both work with both.

If it's purely a street car and you're on a budget get Nistune... whatever you do, do not get a PowerFC. If money isn't an issue, get a Haltech, leave your AFM there just use the internal MAP sensor.

Nistune will support R35/HPX AFM, will support flex setups, has launch control supports boost control etc... it's wonderful bit of kit.

Is there a lot of disadvantages tuning with airflow meter?  Like slow response or inaccurate measurement?  My main goal really is to get good and quick responsive low end, and top end output is just secondary.

I thought Haltech could work on airflow meter without additional vacuum line, at least that's what it reads like on their website.  I guess that leaves me only Nistune.

I have been told at another forum to keep under 6k rpm at all times if I have stock short nose crank, so the thought of a dyno tune really terrified me!

I'd be more concerned about limiter bashing then being over 6000 RPM if the concern is the oil pump Drive gears getting smashed.

there are just some added benefits of having a map speed density tune but that really depends on whether you're venting charge air to atmosphere (bov) if you are then go for a map based tune and if it's a gtr using a 4 dimensional table is best and will run cleaner between gear changes fuel economy is better and plugs won't look shitty.

  • 2 weeks later...

I have got quotes from two OZ vendors on a complete installation kit for Garrett -9's.  Both prices are similar, but one offers all Nissan fasteners and gaskets for $120 AUD more, which I think is a fair price to pay for genuine OEM parts.  But the question is, do I really need those genuine OEM parts?  Also, neither kit comes with exhaust manifold studs and nuts, but strangely does come with exhaust manifold gaskets.  So the removal of exhaust manifolds are expected, but the factory studs and nuts are also expected to be re-used?  How often do they break?

I have got quotes from my local shops, and I don't know if it's because of the lack of experience or this job really is that complicated.  To swap both turbos (with engine in) and have both exhaust manifolds ported, they quote 2 full days or 15-17 hours.  Two shops recommend removing engine for this job, which they say will have cost savings for me because clutch can be replaced at the same time.  And for engine removal plus clutch work the estimated hours are 19-22 hours.  Are those estimates reasonable?

Motor out easier, can be done with engine in but if you're doing the clutch and other shit as well might as well pull the motor out and also do the front diff, baffled sump and better oil pump that's not a N1 pump.

A good shop that knows what they are doing can do turbos with the engine in the car in 8hrs and a clutch in 2hrs

dont bother changing the oil pump if you're not changing the crank and as good as the front diff makes the car it's not worth the expense unless you plan of taking it to the track a lot

  • Like 1
9 hours ago, r32-25t said:

A good shop that knows what they are doing can do turbos with the engine in the car in 8hrs and a clutch in 2hrs

dont bother changing the oil pump if you're not changing the crank and as good as the front diff makes the car it's not worth the expense unless you plan of taking it to the track a lot

Yeah I feel a 2-day quote is a bit excessive, probably due to the lack of experience here.  In addition, I am not sure what's the typical labor rate in Australia, but the hourly rate in my area is pretty absurd at $115 USD an hour.

I rarely track my car.  Although there are a few nice tracks around town, I only go when I cave in to peer pressure lol.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've searched fairly extensively among Japanese websites but found nothing really like those skirts in your photo. The closest I got was Origin Labo side skirts however they look more 'complete' in that they have a finishing piece or tab at the rear of the skirt so it blends into the bodywork, unlike the one in your pic. For that reason I'd say the skirts in your pic could be adapted from another car and they didn't include that tab piece, or those skirts aren't copied from an existing skirt but an original design. Sorry I can't help out in regard to ID'ing/sourcing them
    • Wonder if JB Weld sponsored the event lol
    • There's a big difference between a car built with millions of dollars in R&D, and someone like yourself taking a normal sporty road car, and making it 5 times more powerful. At the same time, get a modern sports car, and you can turn them up towards the 1000hp mark a lot easier too. Also, give that Lambo another 20 odd runs, and chances are it too may break something.
    • There isn’t really a cheap upgrade here. If someone made a decent, bolt in 6 speed that holds some grunt, it would do very well. The 5 speeds suck. You can put a - OSG 5 speed gear set into it. Ratios are tall so it zaps the “zing” out of it. Had one, busted it. - PPG 5 speed gear set synchro or dog’s. Ratios are even taller. - An overpriced Getrag. Nice to drive, expensive to source now. - A sequential of some sort. Expensive, very expensive. How many times do you pop a 5 speed before you throw the toys out of the cot?  
    • Yes, fair call. I don't have any special love for super/hyper cars but it was impressive to watch the Lambo line up against successive skylines without any problem at all. 
×
×
  • Create New...