Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

+1. i've driven a skyline that had really blue lights as the high beams. it was terrible. while they lit up a decent distance, trying to actually make anything out was hard. low beams were actually better for seeing off into the distance than the highbeams were.

once you go above 4000k in a conventional bulb you start losing light.

my advice is to stop being a ricer and get lights that allow you to actually see where you are going

Blue lights and been able to see. I never said i dont want to see at all, But blue with god vision is what im after

Edited by show.it.off

you are the wackest.

*b-boy stance*

blue HID's are annoying as crap. if you MUST get HID get WHITE like the nice people.

blue HID is really annoying and total useless rice and a (worthY) defect notice waiting to happen.

...just putting it out there... have you tried cleaning / restoring your headlights??? because most retards in R33 don't know to do this / don't know how / cant be bothered witht he 20 minutes needed to make them like new again...

but perhaps the reason you're unhappy with your crap light output is relevent to your headlight corrosion?

you are the wackest.

*b-boy stance*

blue HID's are annoying as crap. if you MUST get HID get WHITE like the nice people.

blue HID is really annoying and total useless rice and a (worthY) defect notice waiting to happen.

...just putting it out there... have you tried cleaning / restoring your headlights??? because most retards in R33 don't know to do this / don't know how / cant be bothered witht he 20 minutes needed to make them like new again...

but perhaps the reason you're unhappy with your crap light output is relevent to your headlight corrosion?

Yes i have polished them back, Which made them look alot better, Will white be nice and bright on the road??

It should look like daylight with 5000k, the light produced is very white. As for HIDs into R33 headlights, the R33 headlight housing doesn't concentrate all of the light onto the road, it shines up into the tree tops. 5000k will look like this

Kelvin rating has nothing to do with heat. You have no idea what you are on about.

Sorry Mr forum Warrior Sensai

I know that Kenvin is a unit increment of temperature so dont jump out with somthing you think you know your going to confuse the thread starter

Back on toppic, Your hallogen lights are hotter than a H.I.D but the smaller bulb of the hallogen is placed to far back in the balsiter of the headlight to burn anything or even worry about its heat, just get your normal 55watts and you will be sweet, H.I.D kits are often a problem becaues the bulb is too large for the headlight and being so close to the lens because of the unit with a higher kelvin of about 8000k or so it means instant burn marks on the inside of the lens.

I really think they are not worth it man but if you really want them so bad then just get 5000k or 6000k

I would rather S3 R33 GTR lights brand new from Nissan for $1200 :)

Sorry Mr forum Warrior Sensai

I know that Kenvin is a unit increment of temperature so dont jump out with somthing you think you know your going to confuse the thread starter

I'm terribly sorry, you are wrong. He is right.

You are wrong, wrong, wrong I suggest you shut up and not confuse the OP.

Holy shit man you are just so wrong.

I'm terribly sorry, you are wrong. He is right.

You are wrong, wrong, wrong I suggest you shut up and not confuse the OP.

Holy shit man you are just so wrong.

..........

http://www.windows2universe.org/earth/Atmo...ure/kelvin.html

Yes, but before I bother explaining colour temperature.

Think for a second.... Do you really think those lights are burning at 8000 K? That's ~7725*C

The temperature of the surface of our Sun is ~6000*C

EDIT: Oops, Added instead of minused 273

agreed^. i was driving behind a new-ish honda something or other the other night. the road in front of us, above us, and to the sides, was lit up like a construction zone. i couldnt believe this idiot drives around like that oblivious to the fact he's blinding all the oncoming drivers. it was ridiculous.

Yes, Kelvin is a measure of temperature, it's also a measure of color temperature. In the context of a light-source like this, they're referring to the color temperature.

http://www.3drender.com/glossary/colortemp.htm

munkyboy that's nothing - the other day i was driving around and this guy in a lancer was driving around with HID's on and the lights were bright as so i got out my car n jumped on my penny farthing bicycle and chased him down at the set of lights i asked him to get out of his car n grabbed him by the throat n pulled out my samurai sword n held it to his throat while i forced him to look at his HIDs head on and he was all like

"no please no more sir i see the error in my ways i now get why Rowan is so awesome and i'm still an adopted virgin"

all i could say to him was HA-HAAAAA as i teased him some more for being a virgin...

he started crying so i gave him a chinese burn for being such a wuss, he cried more so i snap kicked him in the head n then i spat on his nanna cos she said blue HID lights were cool, i didn't WANT to snap kick his nanna but she was out of line man, out of line...

so i got back on my penny farthing n rode off into the sunset

by saying "rode off" i meant "made out with"

and by saying "into the sunset" i mean "40 hot blondes"

it was a cool night man you should've been there

now

can we PLEASE STOP FEEDING THE TROLLS

Yes, but before I bother explaining colour temperature.

Think for a second.... Do you really think those lights are burning at 8000 K? That's ~7725*C

The temperature of the surface of our Sun is ~6000*C

EDIT: Oops, Added instead of minused 273

Yes i have always used (°C) = (K) − 273.15

I thought 8000K was about 1100 degreess celsius????

Anyway, i dont think you should get HID's because like everyone says here they shine in peoples eveys and that means the placement of the bulb is totaly incorrect pissing you and everyone else off.

You will have to do a r33 GTR S3 front end conversion too have some good H.I.D's happaneing :)

was stuck at the lights with this fully sick civic driver behind me. i was so close to getting out and telling him to fix his fking lights. was ridiculous, there are reasons high beams are illegal to use around other cars. the same with super bright headlights.

slightly off topic -

nowadays when i'm

A) stopped at traffic lights for a long time behind someone

B) stuck in not moving / slow moving traffic

C) in a multi storey carpark

i turn my headlights off... and leave only my park / city lights on.. then turn the low beams on when i am supposed to

traffic lights... driver in front knows i'm there. driver doesn't need to be blinded by my headlights.

slow moving traffic ie: city, pedestrians don't need my big bright headlights to blind them and i can see from city shop / street lights

multistory carpark is a big one

particularly if i'm on my way out. if i'm "up" and "heading down" a ramp, and another car is coming in, or "heading up" the ramp...

...my headlights point DOWN... naturally... so it shines directly in their eyes if they're left on... as in the central spectrum of light points directly into their retinas in this case, it's not pleasant and i hate having it done to me!

so that's the way i drive - and i encourage other people to take note also... it's just common courtesy! you don't drive with high beams on unless you have to...

so why drive with your headlights on when they're not needed!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...