Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

About $682 and change if you pick them up from his Melbourne warehouse.

I got jumped all over when I suggested getting parts from Japan as opposed to buying them new from Cazz for the DR30 ................ but,

What price do you put on CANNOT BE FOUND IN Australia, near IMPOSSIBLE to get?

I think the cost is reasonable for what they are, if they are what you want.

Remember it is the only source for our classic cars.

I paid over AU$120.00 for a Paul Newman badge and thought it was a bargain, because I couldn't find one anywhere.

Cheers, D

post-2962-1275264583_thumb.jpg

i got the series 1 chromes. naturally they attract a much higher cost than the s2. mainly because there's a shitload more s2 lights for sale!

it took me like a year and a half to own s1 lights and i passed off about 10 opportunities to buy s2's in that time.

that pic is the sex btw lol.

I'd like to get the S1 chromes, i like them better.

But i got mine cause i wanted stove tops right then and there.

and it came with garnish.

do you reckon that this price is pretty steep?

email jesse streeter on [email protected] and find out how much he can source it for.

last time i got a quote it was fairly cheap

not a plug, just saying if you want it cheaper.

yea i got my centre garnish through jesse. very good communication!

I think I will look into that, just love those S1 lights.

How much you reckon i could get for my S2s?

I got them for $390 to my door, looking to get most of that back.

Wires modded to suit Aus spec C210

all 4 lights on low for headlights

then all 4 on high for brakes.

post-67860-1275304438_thumb.jpg

post-67860-1275304546_thumb.jpg

post-67860-1275304573_thumb.jpg

The ones on import monster are at about the same price I payed for mine in Japan(25,000 yen), though mine weren't perfect they where definitely better than those, and cost considerably less to ship.

I think you did well with 400 odd for the S2's Socrates. S1's in the same condition for will fetch good moneys. $400+ AUD in Japan not including additional shipping charges etc.

Nice looking garnish, hardest part to come by in good cond. Check the top mounting bolts on these as they are very brittle.

http://page.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/136659379

Edited by D-limo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...