Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Steve,

Top Result :D

Guys,

I made the change from a NISMO 80mm performance system to a HKS Ti Drag System, and managed to dyno the before and after. I was running the stock turbine, and the results can be seen over on the www.gtr.co.uk forums.

Some details of the exhaust system here

and the dyno graphs are here

Well I just got my car back from being rebuilt and it seems louder and more throaty than before (even though it shouldnt, its probably because I havent driven it for a long time :D ) We did a before and after dyno when I fitted just the cat back section of my N1 and I gained in the region on 18kw@wheels all up this was the first mod I did and I'm sure all the mods after have gained more for it :( Just hope I dont get pulled over cause then I will have to put a resonator on the system.

  • 2 weeks later...

the apex dual n1 it theebest exhast for guaranteed Performance there was even a dyno graph produced by apex to back this up . but they are really really loud.

my sr followed the advice of this thread I ahve a 3 split dump 3" mandrel front pipe hiflow 3" cat to a hybrid hap based exhasut I get boost pressure from 2100 rpm full boost from 3200 and on the dyno chart from the factory they reckoned full boost from 4100 rpm. bizzare but I love it . thanks for the tips steve the advice was followed .

meggala

sounds good is there a link to this review? :)

the apex dual n1 it theebest exhast for guaranteed Performance there was even a dyno graph produced by apex to back this up . but they are really really loud.

my sr followed the advice of this thread I ahve a 3 split dump 3" mandrel front pipe hiflow 3" cat  to a hybrid hap based exhasut I get boost pressure from 2100 rpm full boost from 3200 and on the dyno chart from the factory they reckoned full boost from 4100 rpm. bizzare but I love it . thanks for the tips steve the advice was followed .

meggala

Here you go boys;

"The N1 Duel are designed to retain the same peak HP of the single N-1 while improving mid range torque.N-1 Dual Mufflers are a variant of the popular single-tip N-1 Series Mufflers. The N-1 Dual piping splits into two smaller diameter pipes just after the catalytic converter and flow into a pair of 120mm canisters. The canisters are polished off with aggressive 90mm tips. The use of smaller piping diameter helps retain more mid-range torque. The Dual N-1 does not sacrifice peak horsepower because the dual pipes can handle more exhaust gas volume. Piping is treated with high-temperature titanium particle coating, and the canisters and tips are constructed of polished SUS 304 stainless steel."

Im gona be getting this done :wassup:

yeah, the general knowledge is pretty much 3" pipe the whole way back with as little other restrictions such as cats in the way. i have an 83 car now so i can have just 3" all the way back and then muffler. i had stock dump and front pipe and stock old little cat in there, got the dump and front made 3' and the cat removed, picked up a bit more top end a bit of response, havent dynoed it after it though for any hard proof of difference.

13.58 is correct with pfc base maps @ 12psi, Not bad a!. Considering i had my 2 12'' subs in the car as well. :)

should be a very low 13 this weekend :aroused:

WLD747 dude your best time in your sig is 13.58 right, but arent you running PowerFC base maps ?

dude, not bad, thats ****ING BAD!!! you idiot your gunna kill your car, STOP DRIVING ON THE FARKEN POWERFC BASE MAPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 they are made for seeing that the car starts n idles, NOT FOR DRIVING ON AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RELAX, DJ_L3ThAL Its gona go for a dyno tune this weekend. :D Then i should pull a good 1/4 mile. :) . I just havent had any free time cause of work and this weekend i will. :)

dude, not bad, thats ****ING BAD!!! you idiot your gunna kill your car, STOP DRIVING ON THE FARKEN POWERFC BASE MAPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 they are made for seeing that the car starts n idles, NOT FOR DRIVING ON AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:D if you go calder i'll tag along. Maybe we should do a skyline australia calder thing. :wassup:

i still dont believe ANYONE can pull a 13.58 on a powerfc base map with the mods you have bro, im taking mine to calder soon a got a few more mods than you and i rekon i'd struggle to get low 13s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...