Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i got a new turbo internal wastegate , now i was just wondering whats the best way to control boost? i want to hit 17-18psi max the turbo is a highflow 3576 with a .63 rear housing. Now i have a high pressure actuator on it and when i flloor it it hits 18psi , and also my Greddy EBC profec spec B-II is connected. Should i remove my ebc? and just let it run with the actuator? what is your advice? not really sure what i should do before i get my tune.. cheers

Geraus.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/324215-best-way-to-control-boost/
Share on other sites

if yor profec b isnt up to the job. you should look at the jaycar iebc. i know with a lot of IW turbos, thy hav a drop off in power at higher rpm. the jaycar item allows you to have two boost maps. those maps are fully tuneable allowing you to open/close the WG in small increments when you want. so you can close the WG slightly at the higher rpm to keep that power curve nice and steady. for eg. you can have a wet wether map set at say 10psi, you can tell it to start opening the wg fairly quikly, thus slowly building boost to stop that insane wheel spin in the wet.

you can also have a hi map set to 18psi, keeping the WG shut as long as possible to bring the boost on as quik as possible, then slightly shut the WG at higher rpms to keep that curve steady.

food for thought :cool:

turn the profec off and drive without it doing anything. if it makes boost the way you want it to then yer remove it. if not then use the profec to adjust it, they take a bit of getting used to but they're a good ebc

hmm alright sweet, but i set my greddy profec spec b to 14 psi and it doesnt go to 14psi... it just goes straight to 18psi... does that mean i need to adjust my actuator?

Edited by geraus

Sounds like you have a 1.2 bar actuator?

If so you will never get boost below 18psi (or close enough) no matter what boost controller you use...

Controllers can only raise boost above levels set by the actuator, not lower

I'm in the same boat, got the hypergear ATR43 with high pressure actuator.

I took at least 10mm of preload off it, now it has only about 2-3mm pre-load. It holds true untill boost gets to around 15-16psi then opens.

I also run a greddy profec II but it pretty much isn't doing anything, set on "low" at 0% lol.

Unfortunatly untill i re-do my intake (pod and afm to turbo) i can't hold that boost till redline :)

The boost controller can only rise boost. it can not drop. So if the actuator’s minimum pressure is at 1.2 bar then the minimum boost level can get will be 17psi. Also if your turbo's got gate controller installed then you might want to lose it up or adjust it abit. That sits your final boost level even you have no actuator.

Its in hypergear's thread. Stao updated it few times, the current one holds boost pretty well. He's using the controlled creep method bringing boost up without drop to 7000RPM. Very smart idea, It worked pretty well. I think its a separate apartment from the actuator, it seems like you can always get to the set boost level even the actuator is removed.

Ie if I set my boost level to 18psi with the gate controller it does not matter what I do to the actuator it will always creeps to 18psi. With actuator I get 18psi by 4000RPM with out I get 18psi by 7000RPM. But you can adjust it to set it at what ever level beyond the tip off level with the actuator.

Edited by kwickr33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...