Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I got my r33's apexi neo tuned at allstar garage last week - the result was 260rwhp

When i picked the car up one of the guys told me that there is a drop in power through the mid range and that this is normal for an rb25 and the only way to get rid of it is with a full computer - however after doing some research I have seen dyno graphs of Rb25's with safc tunes that dont have this dip in the power curve???

i have attached my dyno sheet and am looking foward to hearing your comments - its annoying to drive with the dip in the mid range and your basically sitting wait for the power to come...

Comments/ Advice?

post-68071-1278334902_thumb.jpg

Steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/327690-weird-power-curve-after-dyno-tune/
Share on other sites

Seriously... It's rich and retard, when the AFM reads a certain amount of boost (being too high) it pulls heaps of timing out and adds lots of fuel!

You can clearly see on the graph that the boost just spikes a little in the midrange and then car dies in the ass, get a aftermarket computer to solve your problems :P

Seriously... It's rich and retard, when the AFM reads a certain amount of boost (being too high) it pulls heaps of timing out and adds lots of fuel!

You can clearly see on the graph that the boost just spikes a little in the midrange and then car dies in the ass, get a aftermarket computer to solve your problems :P

ok i will look into this - i have seen other rb25's with an safc tune that dont have this problem??

should i turn the boost down 1 psi to avoid entering R &R mode for the time being? im keen to head down to the drags but i think this may mess up my times a bit.

  • Like 1
Seriously... It's rich and retard, when the AFM reads a certain amount of boost (being too high) it pulls heaps of timing out and adds lots of fuel!

You can clearly see on the graph that the boost just spikes a little in the midrange and then car dies in the ass, get a aftermarket computer to solve your problems :P

+1 you can even see where the boost drops back down the curve recovers itself

ok i will look into this - i have seen other rb25's with an safc tune that dont have this problem??

should i turn the boost down 1 psi to avoid entering R &R mode for the time being? im keen to head down to the drags but i think this may mess up my times a bit.

I really doubt you'd notice a 1psi drop but it may be enough that it no longer hits the airflow cut, but really.. if you're worried about 1psi affecting your times, what do you think a big dip in your curve is going to do to your times??

Edited by bubba
+1 you can even see where the boost drops back down the curve recovers itself

I really doubt you'd notice a 1psi drop but it may be enough that it no longer hits the airflow cut, but really.. if you're worried about 1psi affecting your times, what do you think a big dip in your curve is going to do to your times??

sorry mate i meant i was worried about the dip in power affecting times and therefore considering dropping it 1 psi to avoid it... noob question but as the car has been tuned to whatever psi its running at the moment, if i simply drop it down 1 psi do i need to get it re tuned to this boost level?

sorry mate i meant i was worried about the dip in power affecting times and therefore considering dropping it 1 psi to avoid it... noob question but as the car has been tuned to whatever psi its running at the moment, if i simply drop it down 1 psi do i need to get it re tuned to this boost level?

1psi won't make a difference to your tune, and i dont think that 1psi will make the difference so stop rich and retard, so I'd suggest dropping the boost by 2psi increments untill you feel the car has a smoother power band and it's not hitting r+r anymore.

perfecty normal for 33s. the safc will help a little but you cant completely get rid of it when running higher boost without an aftermarket ecu. the small rise in boost is normal too, its from the stupidly retarded timing around that part of the map

this is my 25 when i had a stock ecu, was like hitting vtec

17052008009.jpg

Edited by JonnoHR31

It's an airflow cut anyway, 8psi on one stock 33 turbo isn't going to be quite the same as another stock 33 turbo, especially when you bring china fmic/piping and other individuals setups into the equation. Boost is just a measure of restriction afterall.

Edited by bubba

exactly. and its not a sudden thing, it'll gradually get worse with more airflow. you could even say a 100% stock car is hitting r+r as it runs a little rich and the timing isnt optimum. or from another point of view you might not call it r+r until it takes less than 1 tank of fuel to turn your white rear bumper black and the combustion event is happening more in the turbine housing than the cylinder

+1 for nistune

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...