Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

did my diff oil today, not too much problem, bolts were fairly easy to take off..

Read somewhere that the diff takes about 1.9 - 2L.. I had the car on level ground with a hand pump siphon but could only manage to get about 1.5L. I tried pumping more in but it was dibbling out quicker than i could get it in.

Should it still be ok?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328114-diff/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yep it takes about 1.5 - as long as it continues to come out after you've pumped it in then you're sweet :D

Use an 80w90 for a mostly street-driven vehicle, and circa 85w140 for a track car. Does not need to be LSD fluid for a standard viscous GTS-T diff.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328114-diff/#findComment-5354352
Share on other sites

what diff oil did you use? i was looking at doing mine soon.

used castrol SAF-XA rear axel diff oil 80w90, took about 1.5L

get a hand siphon off ebay its like 10 bucks, it saves soooooooooooooo much time.

birds - yep it was coming out quicker than i could pump it in so figured it was full

havent really found much difference doing the diff oil - it doesnt shudder as much if anything

Edited by defari
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328114-diff/#findComment-5357807
Share on other sites

You probably won't notice much, it's not much of a human interaction device like the gearbox where you can feel through your hand the difference between different oils and fresh/old. Also, diff and gearbox oil can last a long time as it is not exposed to much in the way of contamination like engine oil is. Were you just doing a service interval change or were you trying to fix a diff problem?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328114-diff/#findComment-5357906
Share on other sites

just a service. Had no idea when it was last done / ever done by previous owners. Got all the oils cheap too.

The GB oil change though has made a difference, although the gb never crunched etc, i did it for the same reason as the diff (wasn't sure when it was last done) The gearbox was getting a bit "whiny" in the first 5mins of driving in the morning - the whining noise is somewhat gone but can still hear it slightly however i noticed the car wasnt as jerky when i was getting on/off the gas. Also the gears just felt more "solid".

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328114-diff/#findComment-5358234
Share on other sites

:thumbsup::D:) to assuming nothing had been done.

+1

had a charade that was serviced by a reputable shop and the gearbox eventually died, the old fluid came out "like water" the mech told me so it was way past its service interval.

i do my gearbox and diff oil every 40k km, which is what the service manual states

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328114-diff/#findComment-5364307
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...