Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cool thx for clearing that up :D looks like the 32s all had pretty interesting results

I was sure that redbacks nur would be pulling more than he did which is why I thought i'd ask

-D

Redbacks car, from what I heard, is running a very "light" tune...

  • Replies 329
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Redbacks car, from what I heard, is running a very "light" tune...

correct and did you see the plumage of black smoke coming out of it mega rich = power loss

both mainline dynos

when i got my car back it made 239 rwkw @ Jaustech monday then made 235 awkw @ Willall on Friday 4kw difference Martin looked @ the dyno readout from Jaustech and set his dyno up exactly the same ramp rates

honestly they are Champs i rang him @ 4:30 asking can i get an AFR check and i need it ASAP he got me on within 30 mins and spent like 1hr as hose clamps blew off and what not then only charged $70 which he quoted

but i cant speak highly enough of Martin either rang on friday said can i get him to look @ my tune and said bring it down after lunch and spent time with me getting a hiccup out

Is there a video of the day at all with the cars being run? Would love to get a copy. Filmed the 32 on the dyno but the sounds clips before the cars even get an decent power happening.....didn't help the little sis took the camera for a camp the same weeked :P

great day thanks to everyone for behaving as executives we have heard nothing but praise

BIG thanks to Gareth for putting every car on Thank you Martin and Thanks to Paul

saudynoday2010.jpg

Some nice power outputs there Maz!!! :(

Glad to see the day was a success :)

*WARNING* NSFW - You may wet yourself.

OMG HI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :(

Ben, David has a PowerFC - in fact it is the R32GTR one out of the R that was written off in Targa Tasmania a few months ago (as his old one shat itself). And yes, it is tuned rich as FCUK atm while he fully runs in the motor. Mind you he is not out for HUGE power, as he has chosen response rather than massive numbers - he is running a pair of HKS 2530s - my favourite turbo :)

There is a school of thought that washing the oil off the bores with excess fuel will bed the rings in faster - just not at my school :)

Seriously though, some nice cars and power outputs there on the day. I did guarantee you 600+ Nigthcrawlr, thankfully it delivered!

Ben, David has a PowerFC - in fact it is the R32GTR one out of the R that was written off in Targa Tasmania a few months ago (as his old one shat itself). And yes, it is tuned rich as FCUK atm while he fully runs in the motor. Mind you he is not out for HUGE power, as he has chosen response rather than massive numbers - he is running a pair of HKS 2530s - my favourite turbo :)

yeah, i went with the brand new N1's for that very reason too, and even at 250kw it rocks my jocks.. just want to join that elusive 300kw club if at all possibly without rooting stuff up - will wait and see what martin says about rebuilding my xfer case before i get too serious tho

-D

EDIT - And if he has a pfc, turbos and a nur, whats he waiting for? lol... a full tune will be so much better for his power, response, engine cleanliness and wallett - get he wants to run it in but if he wants to run it in, just keeping it under 5000rpm with a nice tune for the first 5000k would be enuff wouldnt it?

Group buy on rebuilding transfer case?

depends. getting gearboxes out of gtr's is not a quick job, would cost a fair bit i'd imagine, and I dont have a spare xfer case so my car would be off the road while that gets done.. ;\

have to wait n see what martin says.. i know a lot of the parts used in the rebuild are relatively cheap but its very labour intensive from all accounts

-D

If you are in no dire need of your four wheel drive system to work as sharply as it did from the factory then keep going with your existing transfer case. Like every other part of the car they wear out, and the more power, the faster :)

We have several rebuilt cases that we had done (new frictions and steels) that we swap out from time to time on the cars. The parts are available from Nissan :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...