Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all quick question had my exhaust checked out as it was hanging a little low, and realised i had a a full kakimoto exhaust haha only bought the car at the end of feb ;) so score.

My question to you all is what size cat should i run as it still has the compliance cat on it :( , the size of the exhaust is about 3.5 inches so i was thinking 3.5 or would a 3inch cat be alright??

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/
Share on other sites

what size is the exhaust?

Bit surprised you didnt notice... given the fact it would be signifigantly louder than factory...

The Kakimoto exhaust is actually really quiet most people are surprised that it is that quiet, i knew it had the catback but wasnt sure on the front pipes and yesterday i confirmed it.

It looks to be around 3.5 inches

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5360801
Share on other sites

The Kakimoto exhaust is actually really quiet most people are surprised that it is that quiet, i knew it had the catback but wasnt sure on the front pipes and yesterday i confirmed it.

It looks to be around 3.5 inches

I suggest you have a good look and measure :)

3.5" exhaust = 4" cat min

3" exhaust = 3.5" cat min (although i would still use a 4")

You can get 4.5" items IIRC but i dont think you need to go that large

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5361008
Share on other sites

I suggest you have a good look and measure :)

3.5" exhaust = 4" cat min

3" exhaust = 3.5" cat min (although i would still use a 4")

You can get 4.5" items IIRC but i dont think you need to go that large

ill have a good look and measure hopefully tomorrow

then start shopping around :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5361219
Share on other sites

Would it matter if you use say a 3.5" cat with a 3" cat back? Wouldn't the exhaust gas going from 3.5" and hitting the 3" flange be a restriction?

No because have a look @ a CAT

It’s a honeycomb, there is no way its going to flow as much as an unimpeded straight piece of pipe not matter what the manufacturers “claim” they flow, so hence I’ve always been a firm believer of 3.5” at a minimum, preferably 4” if you can.

All you do is weld 3” flanges to it and have it taper to 3.5” or 4”, pretty common stuff and any exhaust shop will be able to do it.

The CAT poses a big restriction if you are making reasonable power.

Even with only 280rwkw currently and a 3.5” exhaust… I can tell if I have my 4” CATCO “Hi-Flow” CAT in the car, is just a straight 3.5” pipe of pipe.

It’s not major, but you can feel the difference so there is at least some minor restriction even @ what I would call mild power levels by todays standards.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5361308
Share on other sites

I suggest you have a good look and measure :D

3.5" exhaust = 4" cat min

3" exhaust = 3.5" cat min (although i would still use a 4")

You can get 4.5" items IIRC but i dont think you need to go that large

Ash, this info is a little misleading, could you please clarify.

Someone may interpret this info as the flange size. The ID of flanges should never step down in line of flow. IE having a 4" flanged cat meet a 3.5" flange on a catback is bound to cause turbulence issues.

From experience, a cat with 75mm ID meeting a 80mm front pipe on a fairly typical SR setup held back power by roughly 50rwkw. FYI gutting the cat did not help either, yet sure enough replacing with an 80mm cat to match fixed everything.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5361381
Share on other sites

3in 100 cell will flow upto 250-280rwkw

3.5in 100 cell will flow upto 300-330rwkw

4in 100 cell will flow 360-400rwkw

5in 100 cell will flow around 500rwkw

if you double the cell count you knock off about 25% of the previous figures. Most 100 and even 200 cell cats won't meet euro4 emmissions. For that you need at least 400cell. Hence why c63 amg have twin 7in cats to make the poer they do and still meet emmissions.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5361568
Share on other sites

Im currently running one of the Loboka 100cpsi fleabay cats. They slip on to a 3 inch pipe, have a 4 inch body and seem to flow quite well, just got 245awkw at RE with one fitted last night. At $150 its a bargain I think. Any larger than a 4 inch body and you will most likely have ground clearance issues.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5361602
Share on other sites

IMO I'd be running whatever cat flows the same as the rest of your exhaust.

You have a 3.5 inch exhaust .....so 3.5 inch flanged 100cpi cat with 5 inch body might be the go.

CES sell this spec.....Ballistic cats can also be had in this spec off the shelf:

http://www.surefloexhaust.com.au/cc.htm

Currently in the process of fitting the CES cat and it looks like a quality item as you would expect.....the honeycomb in my Metal Cat collapsed and wedged itself at the back of the cat body.

Edited by juggernaut1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5361766
Share on other sites

I'm assuming the 200 cell cats flow more than the 100 cell?

I've got a 3" xforce high flow on mine atm, and was thinking of changing it to a 3" catco metalcat, flows up to 709cfm. Only stickiNg with the 3" cat cos my hks cat back is also 3".

Anyone tried this cat before?

Edited by SiR_RB
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5361890
Share on other sites

I suggest you have a good look and measure :P

Meaured quickly today looks to be just under 3.5inch

Ah k thanks ! Who sells 100 cell cats with the skyline flanges already welded on? All complete bolt on cats that I've come across are 200cell

I know just jap sell the 3" catco cats at a really good price

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5362088
Share on other sites

Ash, this info is a little misleading, could you please clarify.

Someone may interpret this info as the flange size. The ID of flanges should never step down in line of flow. IE having a 4" flanged cat meet a 3.5" flange on a catback is bound to cause turbulence issues.

From experience, a cat with 75mm ID meeting a 80mm front pipe on a fairly typical SR setup held back power by roughly 50rwkw. FYI gutting the cat did not help either, yet sure enough replacing with an 80mm cat to match fixed everything.

Ah ye sorry - brain non functional moment :P

Taper upto the flange rather than down... NFI what i was thinking :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329981-cat-size/#findComment-5362209
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...