Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

It has come time to work out the fuel and ECU requirments for my 30DET.

Its a built 30 with oversized valves and a port job with a 35/40 straped on the side etc etc,

I have had a search around and cant find and defenant answer to my questions. Im looking for a single intank fuel pump to support upto 600hp at the rear wheels in a R33 gtst. The engine and turbo combo wont make much over 400kw at the rears if that but it would be nice to have abit of head room with the pump.

I have looked into the bosch 044 but have read about a few other people making 350 - 400kw at the rears and pushing the pump to its limits but have also read about other people running almost the same setup as mine and not having a problem making that sort of power.

Onto injectors, Has anyone had any experiences with Siemens Deka 850cc injectors?

Im also looking for an ECU to run the thing, I have been looking at the Power FC but am open to whatever you guys have had experience with and recomend.

It needs to run the 30DET that will have a front mount, large injectors,big turbo, big cams (no VCT) Budget? There is no budget at the moment so please list anything and everything you recomend =)

Cheers,

Jack

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330893-fuelecu-and-injector-advice/
Share on other sites

Vipec ecu, stock size pump feeding a 3l swirl pot then a bosch 044 or two if ur worried about it, then into a twin entry fuel rail to keep pressure at the injectors more even.

Run a fuel cooler on the return line so when not on boost all that fuel going through the hot fuel rail and back to the tank constantly gets a chance to cool.

Havent tried those injectors.

I was running sard 800cc's with a single 044 with my last GTR rb26 T04Z making 419kw with no issues.

And on a side note because ur budget is not an issue u can build my new car aswell :D

ECU well it's whatever floats your boat though a powerFC will do it just fine in the future if you want REAL data logging look at a MoTeC

Injectors well i wouldn't go past injector dynamics the ID1000's would suit nicely

Fuel system start all new lift pump 040 to surge tank 3L is good the two 044's feed both sides of the rail

My Opinion (Done lots of tuning) :

1. Vipec V88 - Lots of features, then some, and plenty of logging \ inputs \ outputs.

2. I have a nismo 275lph intank pump. Stock Fuel rail, and 555cc injectors. The Nismo pump is rated at 275lph at 80psi. Which is heaps. I'd say enough for 400rwkw. 180lph was enough for me to just touch 300rwkw and start running out of fuel. It also drops straight into the stock position, you absolutely do not have to modify a thing. Touches the bottom of the tank too. EXTREMELY quiet.

3. Injectors - Whatever the biggest Nismos you can get. If they make bigger that 777cc then get them. If not, not sure on what else. Aim for a 4 hole spray pattern, and something that bolts in easily. They all do a good job. The bigger the better incase you decide to use E85.

Edited by The Mafia
The bigger the better incase you decide to use E85.

+1

ECU: Haltech, MoTeC, Vipec (+1 for asking your tuner). I wouldn't go Power FC if you have the cash - they are getting on and lacking in features, resolution for maps and data logging.

Thank you for all your advice. If i can i want a single intank pump and thats it, Its not an option to put a swirl pot in the boot,however may be an option if any one makes one to bolt under the car near the tank somewhere. Ill be looking into the nismo pump first though.

Ill have a look into the injector dynamics and nismo injectors too

cheers,

Jack

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...