Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

okey zero benefit >_< but is there any bad things from installing it? :D

yes your car will not run! it will require a complete retune, this is why there is NO POINT installing it. The only reason people install them is because they have maxed out the standard airflow meter with their turbo setup.

yes your car will not run! it will require a complete retune, this is why there is NO POINT installing it. The only reason people install them is because they have maxed out the standard airflow meter with their turbo setup.

well my car would run will run with the z32 just the settings in the safc that need changing but i have replaced it yet so :(

I have been out tuning the safc now with a friend and the difference is just sooo big! but my question is, right now the AFR is about 12-12.3 should i try to get it more close to 12.5 to get the optimal AFR?

My settings that i did right now is around -8%

And one more thing how do i tune the low throttle position? do i drive with half gas or what? :(

do you have the z32 afm installed or did u do the smart thing and left it stock?

wow -8 huh,, mine arnt that high haha.

low throttle will just be your cruise and idle

my settings besides -7 for idle is a range up up to -4 up to 4500 rpm.

remember that while your at cruise the computer will still show and try hard to stay at 14.7 afr in closed loop form. when you remove fuel from the low throttle the ecu will still compensate back to that number and it wont show what it actually is.

i just trimmed fuel back alittle as i drove and stopped once the car almost hesitated and went back one number.

try it and see.

can your wideband record a run or are you just reading the gauge as you drive :S

I have been out tuning the safc now with a friend and the difference is just sooo big! but my question is, right now the AFR is about 12-12.3 should i try to get it more close to 12.5 to get the optimal AFR?

My settings that i did right now is around -8%

And one more thing how do i tune the low throttle position? do i drive with half gas or what? ;)

-8 interesting

on low throttle I bet you don't have to trim anything back untill around 5500 to 7000 rpm

Again a complete stab in the dark but be interesting to see

Edited by jjskyline79
do you have the z32 afm installed or did u do the smart thing and left it stock?

wow -8 huh,, mine arnt that high haha.

low throttle will just be your cruise and idle

my settings besides -7 for idle is a range up up to -4 up to 4500 rpm.

remember that while your at cruise the computer will still show and try hard to stay at 14.7 afr in closed loop form. when you remove fuel from the low throttle the ecu will still compensate back to that number and it wont show what it actually is.

i just trimmed fuel back alittle as i drove and stopped once the car almost hesitated and went back one number.

try it and see.

can your wideband record a run or are you just reading the gauge as you drive :S

i did the "smart thing" :( yeah well thats how high mine was haha, so just accelerate slowly or one speed?

My wideband can record if you hook it upp to a computer but right now its me and my friend hehe he's looking at the gauge and im telling him the rpms :D works like a charm haha

Do i tune it alittle more? bcoz im closer to 12 then to 12.5, i want the car as optimal as possible :D

And just have to say thank you everybody for all the help!!!

leave it at 12. the extra power you would gain would not be worth the benifits of running it a little richer.

you should not have to touch the low throttle stuff, if you leave it at 0 the car will run like standard

you definitely shouldn't touch low throttle above 5000rpms,

i have mine leaned out a bit up to about 4500 for better fuel economy.

also i lied,, lol i just changed my intake back to stock with a highflow panel and redid a tune... im now up to -8 on some levels aswell

Edited by r33canada
you definitely shouldn't touch low throttle above 5000rpms,

i have mine leaned out a bit up to about 4500 for better fuel economy.

also i lied,, lol i just changed my intake back to stock with a highflow panel and redid a tune... im now up to -8 on some levels aswell

haha then its not just my car, you got me alittle scared there :blink:

My wideband can record if you hook it upp to a computer but right now its me and my friend hehe he's looking at the gauge and im telling him the rpms :blink: works like a charm haha

that is dodgy as hell, hook a computer up and graph AFRs to rpm. You will be able to get a much much smoother power delivery if you do that.

mine was really fricken long,,mine is bundled together near the cabin inlet hole where i shoved it though. i can take a pic of where my plug sits if you want.

its strapped near by there haha

mine was really fricken long,,mine is bundled together near the cabin inlet hole where i shoved it though. i can take a pic of where my plug sits if you want.

its strapped near by there haha

my cable from the sensor is like 10 cm long so it has to be under the car :S i was thinking of making to holes under the car and put it there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...