Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

okey zero benefit >_< but is there any bad things from installing it? :D

yes your car will not run! it will require a complete retune, this is why there is NO POINT installing it. The only reason people install them is because they have maxed out the standard airflow meter with their turbo setup.

yes your car will not run! it will require a complete retune, this is why there is NO POINT installing it. The only reason people install them is because they have maxed out the standard airflow meter with their turbo setup.

well my car would run will run with the z32 just the settings in the safc that need changing but i have replaced it yet so :(

I have been out tuning the safc now with a friend and the difference is just sooo big! but my question is, right now the AFR is about 12-12.3 should i try to get it more close to 12.5 to get the optimal AFR?

My settings that i did right now is around -8%

And one more thing how do i tune the low throttle position? do i drive with half gas or what? :(

do you have the z32 afm installed or did u do the smart thing and left it stock?

wow -8 huh,, mine arnt that high haha.

low throttle will just be your cruise and idle

my settings besides -7 for idle is a range up up to -4 up to 4500 rpm.

remember that while your at cruise the computer will still show and try hard to stay at 14.7 afr in closed loop form. when you remove fuel from the low throttle the ecu will still compensate back to that number and it wont show what it actually is.

i just trimmed fuel back alittle as i drove and stopped once the car almost hesitated and went back one number.

try it and see.

can your wideband record a run or are you just reading the gauge as you drive :S

I have been out tuning the safc now with a friend and the difference is just sooo big! but my question is, right now the AFR is about 12-12.3 should i try to get it more close to 12.5 to get the optimal AFR?

My settings that i did right now is around -8%

And one more thing how do i tune the low throttle position? do i drive with half gas or what? ;)

-8 interesting

on low throttle I bet you don't have to trim anything back untill around 5500 to 7000 rpm

Again a complete stab in the dark but be interesting to see

Edited by jjskyline79
do you have the z32 afm installed or did u do the smart thing and left it stock?

wow -8 huh,, mine arnt that high haha.

low throttle will just be your cruise and idle

my settings besides -7 for idle is a range up up to -4 up to 4500 rpm.

remember that while your at cruise the computer will still show and try hard to stay at 14.7 afr in closed loop form. when you remove fuel from the low throttle the ecu will still compensate back to that number and it wont show what it actually is.

i just trimmed fuel back alittle as i drove and stopped once the car almost hesitated and went back one number.

try it and see.

can your wideband record a run or are you just reading the gauge as you drive :S

i did the "smart thing" :( yeah well thats how high mine was haha, so just accelerate slowly or one speed?

My wideband can record if you hook it upp to a computer but right now its me and my friend hehe he's looking at the gauge and im telling him the rpms :D works like a charm haha

Do i tune it alittle more? bcoz im closer to 12 then to 12.5, i want the car as optimal as possible :D

And just have to say thank you everybody for all the help!!!

leave it at 12. the extra power you would gain would not be worth the benifits of running it a little richer.

you should not have to touch the low throttle stuff, if you leave it at 0 the car will run like standard

you definitely shouldn't touch low throttle above 5000rpms,

i have mine leaned out a bit up to about 4500 for better fuel economy.

also i lied,, lol i just changed my intake back to stock with a highflow panel and redid a tune... im now up to -8 on some levels aswell

Edited by r33canada
you definitely shouldn't touch low throttle above 5000rpms,

i have mine leaned out a bit up to about 4500 for better fuel economy.

also i lied,, lol i just changed my intake back to stock with a highflow panel and redid a tune... im now up to -8 on some levels aswell

haha then its not just my car, you got me alittle scared there :blink:

My wideband can record if you hook it upp to a computer but right now its me and my friend hehe he's looking at the gauge and im telling him the rpms :blink: works like a charm haha

that is dodgy as hell, hook a computer up and graph AFRs to rpm. You will be able to get a much much smoother power delivery if you do that.

mine was really fricken long,,mine is bundled together near the cabin inlet hole where i shoved it though. i can take a pic of where my plug sits if you want.

its strapped near by there haha

mine was really fricken long,,mine is bundled together near the cabin inlet hole where i shoved it though. i can take a pic of where my plug sits if you want.

its strapped near by there haha

my cable from the sensor is like 10 cm long so it has to be under the car :S i was thinking of making to holes under the car and put it there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...