Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The N/A and Turbo AFM's physically appear to be identical and I didnt have any issues with mine (S1, green label) but I suppsoe it couldnt hurt to try

Fuel pressure is normal, 45psi at idle, goes up to 55-60psi when revved-appears to be working. Will re-drive the car tomorrow and see if anything feels different, but otherwise going to look at some form of engine management or even an SAFC at this stage and work from there.

Isn't normal fuel pressure 3Bar (43psi) at ATMO? So at idle with a vacuum it should be running somewhere around 32-33psi and with 7psi boost it should peak at about 50psi???

That would mean its running about 10psi too much fuel pressure; If so, that would be pushing your injectors to about 400cc which would richen your mixtures by a good >10% (which if factory takes you to 10-10.5:1 that justifies mixtures down to ~ 9:1 odd).

Just an idea, are you on the stock reg?

Edited by SKiT_R31

Ah ok. I thought stock fuel pressure was ~45 psi at idle, hose connected? So 10psi higher fuel pressure might be causing it....

And yeah it's the stock reg. I'll try and find what the pressure is meant to be...

Ok, general consensus is ~35 psi at idle, ~45psi reg disconnected/atmo pressure. So I do have high fuel pressure. But the reg is still working normally as the pressure changes when the engine is revved or the reg disconnected?

I doubt 10 psi extra can do damage? As most people up the pressure before replacing injectors as a cheat.

I'd say an SAFC is needed and try lean it out a bit. Will check the return line isn't blocked/damper faulty etc before-hand to avoid the problem "fixing itself" and f****** something later on....

Hi Guy's,

I have just completed my NA + T conversion on my R32 and am chuffed with the results.

Here is my setup:

1992 R32 GTS25 - standard RB25DE

R32 GTS-T side mount intercooler and standard pipework

RB20 turbo and standard oil/water lines

Standard Exhaust system

NGK BKR7E plugs

RB20 ECU

Install was straightforward (though time consuming) and the only custom work required was to cut the body for the intercooler pipes and to cut and tee

into the heater hose line for the water return from the turbo.

I was lucky to have purchased a complete running 1993 R32 GTST that could not be complied that I have been using parts (having previously used for 5 stud conversion). This made it easy to refer to the how the setup works.

Performance is great and the car is fun to drive - I have only done an initial drive to make sure all is well but I think the turbo will run out of puff high in the rev range (due to the small turbo I presume).

I have taken photos of every step and intend to put together a D.I.Y guide

Jason

Hi Guy's,

I have just completed my NA + T conversion on my R32 and am chuffed with the results.

Here is my setup:

1992 R32 GTS25 - standard RB25DE

R32 GTS-T side mount intercooler and standard pipework

RB20 turbo and standard oil/water lines

Standard Exhaust system

NGK BKR7E plugs

RB20 ECU

Install was straightforward (though time consuming) and the only custom work required was to cut the body for the intercooler pipes and to cut and tee

into the heater hose line for the water return from the turbo.

I was lucky to have purchased a complete running 1993 R32 GTST that could not be complied that I have been using parts (having previously used for 5 stud conversion). This made it easy to refer to the how the setup works.

Performance is great and the car is fun to drive - I have only done an initial drive to make sure all is well but I think the turbo will run out of puff high in the rev range (due to the small turbo I presume).

I have taken photos of every step and intend to put together a D.I.Y guide

Jason

Yeah cool. Nah it wont do any damage, I've played that game before to squeeze more out of small injectors. SAFC sounds like a good option, should make a world of difference for power and economy :P.

Yeah didn't think so. maybe 60-70+ psi could upset things. With your SAFC, what throttle setting (%/volts) did you have your map switching point? From what I understand, anything below ~%35 throttle when the engine is hot is useless for tuning as the ECU is in closed loop and reads off the O2 sensor? Is this true or does it still use the MAF signal? Ordered a second hand SAFC today, very keen to get it in and get the car back on the dyno!

Only other thing i've noticed is I re-used the connector from the throttle body to the intake/cross-over pipe during the conversion. Will have to get a new piece of silicone hose to replace it in-case it's gone hard and leaking, but doesn't appear to under vacuum.

I wound 37-38% out of my tune accross the board to get it stable at 12.0:1 AFR, you'll nearly max out yours!

Yeah not sure how lean i'm going to take it, as i'm running the standard SMIC with extended custom piping to the R/H/F guard. This configuration is working well at ~7psi and the intake doesn't get much above ambient. I think trying for somewhere between ~11:1-~12:1, and slowly increasing the boost while checking for knock should yield a much better result, but keep the whole package reliable.

Hi Guy's,

I have just completed my NA + T conversion on my R32 and am chuffed with the results.

Here is my setup:

1992 R32 GTS25 - standard RB25DE

R32 GTS-T side mount intercooler and standard pipework

RB20 turbo and standard oil/water lines

Standard Exhaust system

NGK BKR7E plugs

RB20 ECU

Install was straightforward (though time consuming) and the only custom work required was to cut the body for the intercooler pipes and to cut and tee

into the heater hose line for the water return from the turbo.

I was lucky to have purchased a complete running 1993 R32 GTST that could not be complied that I have been using parts (having previously used for 5 stud conversion). This made it easy to refer to the how the setup works.

Performance is great and the car is fun to drive - I have only done an initial drive to make sure all is well but I think the turbo will run out of puff high in the rev range (due to the small turbo I presume).

I have taken photos of every step and intend to put together a D.I.Y guide

Jason

Congratulations! Another +T! They're good fun to drive as there is alot of punch down low, and very consistent/smooth power across the board. No doubt you'll be looking for more power soon though... thumbsup.gif

Yeah didn't think so. maybe 60-70+ psi could upset things. With your SAFC, what throttle setting (%/volts) did you have your map switching point? From what I understand, anything below ~%35 throttle when the engine is hot is useless for tuning as the ECU is in closed loop and reads off the O2 sensor? Is this true or does it still use the MAF signal? Ordered a second hand SAFC today, very keen to get it in and get the car back on the dyno!

Only other thing I’ve noticed is I re-used the connector from the throttle body to the intake/cross-over pipe during the conversion. Will have to get a new piece of silicone hose to replace it in-case it's gone hard and leaking, but doesn't appear to under vacuum.

Disconnect your 02 sensor when tuning. I had my crossover at about 35% actually, it is important to tune this section as closed loop is only active under consistent throttle/revs (or mild changes) if you give the throttle a light stab, or under pretty much all start-stop city driving (unless your stupidly gentle at ~ 10%) it breaks closed loop; If you don’t tune this region your economy will be terrible (and when you do, your part throttle torque will be amazing). I tuned my part throttle at 13:1 until 4000rpm and then to 12.5:1, and my WOT to 12.5:1 until 3500 and then 12:1, richening to 11.5 at ~4500rpm as that’s a common spot for detonation (typical for peak torque rpm) but then back to 12:1 up top.

If you're using any of the factory black rubber 90 degree bends, pull them off and check them. It’s really common for them to split on the inside of the bend and blow open under boost (I've known of 2 that have done this and caused headaches in the past).

Disconnect your 02 sensor when tuning. I had my crossover at about 35% actually, it is important to tune this section as closed loop is only active under consistent throttle/revs (or mild changes) if you give the throttle a light stab, or under pretty much all start-stop city driving (unless your stupidly gentle at ~ 10%) it breaks closed loop; If you don't tune this region your economy will be terrible (and when you do, your part throttle torque will be amazing). I tuned my part throttle at 13:1 until 4000rpm and then to 12.5:1, and my WOT to 12.5:1 until 3500 and then 12:1, richening to 11.5 at ~4500rpm as that's a common spot for detonation (typical for peak torque rpm) but then back to 12:1 up top.

If you're using any of the factory black rubber 90 degree bends, pull them off and check them. It's really common for them to split on the inside of the bend and blow open under boost (I've known of 2 that have done this and caused headaches in the past).

Ah ok, so the low throttle map does need tuning for better power/economy. So the O2 sensor is only used during say highway driving, MAF sensor for the rest? Effectively, the low throttle map allows you to tune the car leaner under light load, then richer to prevent ping under heavy load? Cheers for the advice.

I have 2 of the right angle bends, so will take a look and see how they're holding up. Already have a new piece on way for the crossover to throttle-body connection.

Congratulations! Another +T! They're good fun to drive as there is alot of punch down low, and very consistent/smooth power across the board. No doubt you'll be looking for more power soon though... thumbsup.gif

thanks, yes i am already thinking about more power. I have a 3" Apexi exhaust that i will fit soon.

I have An issue though - i have done 300km of freeway driving (first drive since conversipn) and fuel economy is pretty poor. On this trip i used almost three quarters of a tank, which doesn't sound right. Not sure if its related but when the turbo comes on boost at 2000rpm there is quite an audible turbo whistle. This only occurs under load. If i rev the engine to 2000rpm in park there is no whistle. I have checked all inlet pipes and hoses and everything is nice and tight and i can see no possible places where there could be leaks. The engine does not seem to be running rich (no black tailpipe) and the car idles fine and no issues when driving.

Does anyone have any ideas? Is fuel economy like this normal? Should the turbo whistle? Is the ECU still learning and perhaps explains the poor fuel economy?

Jason

thanks, yes i am already thinking about more power. I have a 3" Apexi exhaust that i will fit soon.

I have An issue though - i have done 300km of freeway driving (first drive since conversipn) and fuel economy is pretty poor. On this trip i used almost three quarters of a tank, which doesn't sound right. Not sure if its related but when the turbo comes on boost at 2000rpm there is quite an audible turbo whistle. This only occurs under load. If i rev the engine to 2000rpm in park there is no whistle. I have checked all inlet pipes and hoses and everything is nice and tight and i can see no possible places where there could be leaks. The engine does not seem to be running rich (no black tailpipe) and the car idles fine and no issues when driving.

Does anyone have any ideas? Is fuel economy like this normal? Should the turbo whistle? Is the ECU still learning and perhaps explains the poor fuel economy?

Jason

Fuel economy should be the same, provided your not giving the car a hard time. Did you re-connect the O2 sensor after fitting the dump pipe? How much time are you spending on boost?

Fuel economy should be the same, provided your not giving the car a hard time. Did you re-connect the O2 sensor after fitting the dump pipe? How much time are you spending on boost?

Hi,

Not giving the car a hard time - was on the freeway so mostly cruising. I did re-connect the 02 sensor. I don't have a boost gauge fitted yet so hard to tell what the boost is doing but I did notice that the cruising RPM on the freeway is around 2000 rpm (which my car was on before conversion also) which

is around the same RPM that the turbo comes on boost (only gauging by the whistle). However the turbo does not constantly whistle

Jason

Fuel economy should be the same, provided your not giving the car a hard time. Did you re-connect the O2 sensor after fitting the dump pipe? How much time are you spending on boost?

Hi,

Not giving the car a hard time - was on the freeway so mostly cruising. I did re-connect the 02 sensor. I don't have a boost gauge fitted yet so hard to tell what the boost is doing but I did notice that the cruising RPM on the freeway is around 2000 rpm (which my car was on before conversion also) which

is around the same RPM that the turbo comes on boost (only gauging by the whistle). However the turbo does not constantly whistle

Jason

Hi,

Not giving the car a hard time - was on the freeway so mostly cruising. I did re-connect the 02 sensor. I don't have a boost gauge fitted yet so hard to tell what the boost is doing but I did notice that the cruising RPM on the freeway is around 2000 rpm (which my car was on before conversion also) which

is around the same RPM that the turbo comes on boost (only gauging by the whistle). However the turbo does not constantly whistle

Jason

Seems normal. The turbo depends on load and throttle position to actually make boost, so you might hear it spool/whistle, but it's not actually making boost. You said above you're using an RB20 ECU on an RB25DE? I'm assuming it suits the turbo car? As that can f*** everything right up if it's to suit an N/A. Is it tuned to suit the extra .5 litre or just stock?

Fuel economy shouldn't change too much if you only baby the car. Mine easily does ~10L/100km on the highway and could get better if it wasn't so much fun coming out of a 60 zone into a 100 zone in third gear, but have seen anywhere up to 16L/100km around town or giving it a hard time. (Stock RB25DET ECU)

Seems normal. The turbo depends on load and throttle position to actually make boost, so you might hear it spool/whistle, but it's not actually making boost. You said above you're using an RB20 ECU on an RB25DE? I'm assuming it suits the turbo car? As that can f*** everything right up if it's to suit an N/A. Is it tuned to suit the extra .5 litre or just stock?

Fuel economy shouldn't change too much if you only baby the car. Mine easily does ~10L/100km on the highway and could get better if it wasn't so much fun coming out of a 60 zone into a 100 zone in third gear, but have seen anywhere up to 16L/100km around town or giving it a hard time. (Stock RB25DET ECU)

Yep I used ad RB20 ECU - the pinouts are exactly the same except for the fuel control pump modulator which my car being a non-turbo does not have (i am actually thinking about wiring this in to my car). Everything is stock and has not been tuned. I used the RB20 ECU as I thought the fuel maps would better suited to a turbo. Perhaps I should revert back

to my RB25DE CPU and see how the fuel economy is. Not fussed by the whistle sound (sounds great!) as long as it isn't an issue.

Jase

Yep I used ad RB20 ECU - the pinouts are exactly the same except for the fuel control pump modulator which my car being a non-turbo does not have (i am actually thinking about wiring this in to my car). Everything is stock and has not been tuned. I used the RB20 ECU as I thought the fuel maps would better suited to a turbo. Perhaps I should revert back

to my RB25DE CPU and see how the fuel economy is. Not fussed by the whistle sound (sounds great!) as long as it isn't an issue.

Jase

Josh - just to clarify I am using and RB20DET ECU not an RB20DE ECU

Jase

Josh - just to clarify I am using and RB20DET ECU not an RB20DE ECU

Jase

No worries, some people have tried using the DE ecu on the DE+T with not-so-good results. They don't have fuel or timing maps to suit the turbo and cause problems. It could be that the extra .5 litre is pushing the RB20 ECU near R&R (extra %25 airflow, even at the same boost) causing your excess fuel usage? Or even if the ECU constantly thinks the car is on boost and richens up accordingly? A re-map/tune will definitely help in all fields...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...