Jump to content
SAU Community

How to turbo your N/A


Recommended Posts

Hi guys I was wondering what your fuel economy is like now compared to before and compared to a normal factory Turbo? I am leaning towards a full engine swap but I like the idea of having the benefits of an NA for good throttle response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys I was wondering what your fuel economy is like now compared to before and compared to a normal factory Turbo? I am leaning towards a full engine swap but I like the idea of having the benefits of an NA for good throttle response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As he has said is fine provided you have the gtst injectors and afm. as for adding in a few psi and not getting as much as a Gtst - well I got more - as long as you have a good free flowing exhaust why don't you think you'd get as much as a gtst?

My bad, I meant that 10 psi on a DE+T with a stock ecu compared to a stock DET. As in ping and engine death etc. The gains, if tuned correctly are more with the same air/fuel/timing as the engine can do more with it due to compression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys I was wondering what your fuel economy is like now compared to before and compared to a normal factory Turbo? I am leaning towards a full engine swap but I like the idea of having the benefits of an NA for good throttle response.

Hey mate.

My fuel economy hasn't really changed, if you drive the car the same way as you did when it was NA the fuel economy will be the same. If you boost the tits off the car everytime you drive, then fuel economy will follow suit.

On the highway, even on a stock ecu, boost and injectors, running 10psi too much fuel pressure due to a dud fuel reg (soon to be replaced) I can get 10L/100km or lower even with people in the car and aircon on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bad, I meant that 10 psi on a DE+T with a stock ecu compared to a stock DET. As in ping and engine death etc. The gains, if tuned correctly are more with the same air/fuel/timing as the engine can do more with it due to compression.

Ahh right, I get you now. But really, to the guy asking the question - if you want to get anything out of your turbo gear, get a tuneable ecu and u'll notice a big difference

Also, When I first turboed the car running all standard turbo gear, my economy actually improved because the turbo was helping the motor do the work - provided you are not just thrashing, it will be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Done this turbo conversion last weekend with my rb20de.

Thought i should take some pics of the plugs on the side of the block for people as i dont think i have seen any on here yet.

for the oil return i used proflow part no. PFE841-12 3/4 NPT to Barb.

Also fuel economy is pretty much the same too.

post-89837-0-73325300-1330698637_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guy's,

As mentioned I did DE+T conversion on my R32 gts25 last year using rb20det parts and have been happy with the results.

However I think I have a problem with the factory bov. With the bov plumbed in correctly to the inlet manifold the car is sluggish (basically feels like a na, with a little more power).

As a test I plumbed the bov into a smaller (ie thinner) vacum port and the car drives like a completely different car. Boost is strong and the car pulls hard through all the gears. There is the sound of compressor surge sometimes as I close the throttle. I expected this though and confirms the bov is not working as it does not have a proper source of vacum. Sure enough when I revert back to the correct setup (plumbed with the correct hose direct into inlet manifold) the car is sluggish again. The bov must be opening on throttle. Also to add I don't have a boost gauge as yet so not sure what's happening boost wise.

So the question I have is - should the factory bov be able to handle the increased flow of the na engine plus the turbo (I am using a standard rb20 turbo) or can it only handle the factory turbo setup? Would I best fitting an aftermarket plumback bov (like a turbosmart kompact)?

I have also removed the bov and inspected and it seems fine (though there is not much to check)

Cheers

Jason

Edited by gts25
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Guy's,

As mentioned I did DE+T conversion on my R32 gts25 last year using rb20det parts and have been happy with the results.

However I think I have a problem with the factory bov. With the bov plumbed in correctly to the inlet manifold the car is sluggish (basically feels like a na, with a little more power).

As a test I plumbed the bov into a smaller (ie thinner) vacum port and the car drives like a completely different car. Boost is strong and the car pulls hard through all the gears. There is the sound of compressor surge sometimes as I close the throttle. I expected this though and confirms the bov is not working as it does not have a proper source of vacum. Sure enough when I revert back to the correct setup (plumbed with the correct hose direct into inlet manifold) the car is sluggish again. The bov must be opening on throttle. Also to add I don't have a boost gauge as yet so not sure what's happening boost wise.

So the question I have is - should the factory bov be able to handle the increased flow of the na engine plus the turbo (I am using a standard rb20 turbo) or can it only handle the factory turbo setup? Would I best fitting an aftermarket plumback bov (like a turbosmart kompact)?

I have also removed the bov and inspected and it seems fine (though there is not much to check)

Cheers

Jason

I've seen the stock bov being used on setups making well over 300rwkw. Where have you plumbed it into? Have you got another one you could try? I think yours is possibly a bit worn out, sounds like it doesn't have enough spring pressure to keep it shut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Martin,

I have it plumbed in as it should be - from the bov air nipple into the metal air that's bolted under the intake pipe (to throttle body) and from the other end of this pipe into the top of the inlet manifold towards the back (where the charcoal canister line used to plumb into on the NA setup). Does this make sense?

I don't have a spare bov to try but am trying to get hold of a gtr one

Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Martin,

I have it plumbed in as it should be - from the bov air nipple into the metal air that's bolted under the intake pipe (to throttle body) and from the other end of this pipe into the top of the inlet manifold towards the back (where the charcoal canister line used to plumb into on the NA setup). Does this make sense?

I don't have a spare bov to try but am trying to get hold of a gtr one

Jason

Yes makes sense, should work like that. I think try to get hold of another bov, GTR one will be even better. How hard is it to push the valve open by hand, do you know? I've got a stock R34 bov sitting here that is quite hard to push open, it's fairly stiff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Martin,

I have it plumbed in as it should be - from the bov air nipple into the metal air that's bolted under the intake pipe (to throttle body) and from the other end of this pipe into the top of the inlet manifold towards the back (where the charcoal canister line used to plumb into on the NA setup). Does this make sense?

I don't have a spare bov to try but am trying to get hold of a gtr one

Jason

Are you sure the vacuum line from the bov is going to the intake manifold BEHIND the throttle? This vacuum is used to equalise the pressure in the BOV so it doesn't creep open under boost (as regardless how much boost you are running at WOT there will be the same pressure in-front and behind the BOV). It then pulls open quickly when the throttle closes (as not only does it have boost pushing it open, it has vacuum on the other side from the intake manifold pulling it open at the same time). If it isn't connected (or in the right place) without equalising the pressure I can see that the boost could push past it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure the vacuum line from the bov is going to the intake manifold BEHIND the throttle? This vacuum is used to equalise the pressure in the BOV so it doesn't creep open under boost (as regardless how much boost you are running at WOT there will be the same pressure in-front and behind the BOV). It then pulls open quickly when the throttle closes (as not only does it have boost pushing it open, it has vacuum on the other side from the intake manifold pulling it open at the same time). If it isn't connected (or in the right place) without equalising the pressure I can see that the boost could push past it.

the bov is plumbed after the throttle into the top of the inlet manifold, towards the rear. is this not the correct location? the na manifold has only 1 vacum port in this location for the charcoal canister and the gtst manifold has an additional one for the bov

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes makes sense, should work like that. I think try to get hold of another bov, GTR one will be even better. How hard is it to push the valve open by hand, do you know? I've got a stock R34 bov sitting here that is quite hard to push open, it's fairly stiff.

hey martin,

i checked the valve, i can push it with my thumb but its quite stiff....

jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...