Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am looking at building a serious N/A RB for Improved Production racing.

Must be N/A, under 3L, Straight, 6 cylinders and Nissan.

L series and RB are the only 2 that fit these and as the L series is getting a little long in the tooth I think the RB would be the better option. The L series has been proven over many years but it has also been developed to its limit. I think with some effort the RB should be capable of better results.

The goal is 200rwkw.

I expect that this will obviously cost a fair bit and require a lot of work. I want some opinions on what would be required to get there if it can be done.

I have seen a few N/A RB's get around 150 - 164rwkw on these forums so I think it should be possible. I am not after opinions on turbos, v6's, rotary's, Toyotas or anything else. Just simply what is required to get an N/A RB to 200rwkw.

I do not want to buy a ready done car as this simply does not interest me. I enjoy the design and build as much if not more than the racing itself.

Must be below 3L. Must be a straight Nissan 6. Must be N/A. Must run on 102ron fuel as per CAMS rules.

I would also like opinions on the question of Revs vs Displacement.

Option 1. Rb30 bottom end Rb26 head = 3L.

Option 2. Rb30 block Rb26 crank Rb26 head = 2.7L

Option 3. Rb30 block Rb20 crank Rb26 head = 2.6L

2 &3 have superior rod stroke ratios and in theory should rev higher, but will the cubes of the 3L win out.

I am collecting the parts for the build over the coming months. Obviously I will speak to a few engine builders before starting but would like to gather some opinions and knowledge from here 1st.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/334150-200rwkw-na-rb-whats-required/
Share on other sites

rb26 long motor convert to n/a with custom tuned length exhaust mani, itb's, cams etc. should get you your power goal, has been done numerous times in japan, do a search on google, would probably be the most reliable option and simplest to complete.

As I said in the thread that dissapeared, I would be concentrating on mid range torque rather than a peak power number, go the 26/30 add ITB's and cams, compression around 11:1 and rev it as hard as the valve train/bottom end will allow, dont worry about the final peak power number on a dyno....it will mean sweet FA on track if you get dusted up down QRs main strait by a 1600cc corrolla because your car doesnt start making power untill 6000 rpm and is all over by 7500.

then spend the money on some MCAs and big bastard brakes and you will be faster with 150rwkws and an excellent handling/stopping car over a car that you have spent squillings on to get 200rwks and have shithouse brakes/suspension

Plus an RB making an easyish 150-170rwks will be a shit load more reliable than one spinning to 9000+ and making 200.

Im not sure how much circuit expirence you have but there is more to a circuit car than a dyno number.

Actually tyresbro I'm not new, I've been a member since Jan '07, and browsed here long before that. Post counts don't mean much.And yes I have read that thread numerous times but it doesn't come to any real conclusions.

Zebra I may be somewhat new to competitive motorsport but that does not make me a newb. I do understand how a curcuit car works. Suspension, brakes etc are under control. What I want to know is if my chosen car and engine, each of which dictate the other in improved prod, are up to the task of putting competitive power down. I'm trying to find this out now before I outlay money on a base car and engine.

What I would like is people who have experience/knowledge on different aspects of what is needed to share thier opinions on cost and power.

Here is a quote from sydneykid a few years ago. Share what you know/think about this combo.

"One day I will put one of these into a 240/260Z

RB30 block and crank

3.1 litres

13.5 to 1 compression ratio

Polished combustion chambers

272 duration 10.8 mm lift cams

Titanium retainers

Tome valve springs, 55 lbs at the seat

2 mm oversize inlet valves

1 mm oversize exhaust valves

Ported RB26 cylinder head

Ported RB26 inlet, multiple throttle bodies and plenum

Tuned, coned collector extractors

4” titanium exhaust

JE forged pistons

Carrillo rods and rod bolts

ARP main bearing studs

ARP head studs

ACL race series bearings

N1 oil pump, with wide flange drive crank collar

RB26 water pump

Elf LM fuel

Motec ECU

Motec CDI

Mercury outboard coils

WoooHooo……400 bhp here we come….and wouldn’t it sound good"

Now it has to be under 3L so ignore the 3.1L bit. What about the extra revs of a 2.7L setup, would the extra 300cc of the 3L trump it?

That sounds like a good combo, but the 13.5:1 comp may be a might much for a circuit car that needs to run hard for lap after lap on petroleum, 13:1 would be fine for alchohol or E85 though, not sure if IPRA QLD allows E85 or not.

and could prob go bigger on the cams for an atmo engine, get something made to suit a non turbo.

Oh and forget the N1 pump, spend the $$$ on an external pump at a minimum unless you wanna rebuild it after every event

Dry sump would be even better.

Well then, suggestions of my own:

Reduce unsprung weight

- Lightweight pulleys

- Lightweight flywheel

- Lightweight clutch

- Balanced crankshaft

- Lightweight wheels

- Lightweight tyres

- CF driveshaft

- Lightweight drive shafts

- Lightweight cams

- Lightweight brakes

Why? because not only will it lighten your car up and increase acceleration, it works well for dyno figures as you are using more % of the raw combustions from the engine. Should be coupled with decent power mods. By the way this is just a theory lol

Edited by TyresBro

Thanks fellas, thats the kind of stuff I'm after.

I think 102ron fuel is the max allowed from what I've found so far. What comp do you think you could run on that.

What are the biggest practical cams you've seen on other NA engines. I've seen 312' on a 4age I think.

Thanks fellas, thats the kind of stuff I'm after.

I think 102ron fuel is the max allowed from what I've found so far. What comp do you think you could run on that.

What are the biggest practical cams you've seen on other NA engines. I've seen 312' on a 4age I think.

290deg total duration would be a good starting point for an angry NA engine, would need a solid lifter conversion if you were to use a 25 head, or a bucket over shim setup for a 26 and something around 11mm lift, it would need a bit of clearancing of the head.

Best bet would be to speak to a top notch head builder about port work etc as they will really determine what cams will work and a cam grinder will want to know the flow numbers of the head at different lifts.

We can only help you so much over the internets, as im not a cam manufacturer and without seeing flow numbers of the ports its just guess work.

1 more thing - spend more money on the head than the bottom end, as that is where the power is produced.

If there was 2.75" i'd definately get that.

2.5" has very linear power from low to high. Gives more precise throttle adjustment/levels too. Revs faster or more responsive. Lacks the kick in power and i'm guessing max power compared to 3" by feel.

3" is pretty empty down low but is a blast at high rpm (5k and over) like VTEC just kicked in yo. Lack of back pressure makes the throttle feel weak at low RPM and not very precise. Feels like it has more top end power than 2.5".

This is from a guy who just got his cat back changed today.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
×
×
  • Create New...