Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

l have dash 5 on my setup and personally l do not think it will give you that rush you are after. If want that big shove in the back feeling go for a big single. If l had to do it all over again thats what l would do.

I cannot see how 380-400rwkw of -5s wouldn't give you that feeling?

Having been in a few -5 cars, and hopefully taking one for a drive soon just to compare that to -9s, they certainly pin you to the seat when setup properly running 20-22psi/380rwkw or so with a solid tune.

But then each to their own as you said.

yeh big single for the kick in the pants feeling... went in a 33GTR with a T88... was only putting out 360kw but the way it delivered boost was completely different

lag lag lag... then WHAM... big rush of power

lol 360rwkw outta a T88?

-9 equipped car with less power would most likely still be faster :)

If you just want a "rush" drive the car and hold throttle @ 4000rpm and then plent the foot. Same as a laggy turbo :D

Nismoid, my car is making a "claimed" 380RWKW on 25 psi of boost and was built and tuned by the same guys that have done your car. Comparing it to other GTR's running big singles such as a TO4z which is what l wanted to do in the first place but talked out of, stating that a twin setup using these lady -5's will be quicker. From my experience when both cars on a rolling start and in there boost range the big single always wins and feeling you get as you are thrown back in the seat is much more intence. The only benefit l see using my setup is the stock appearance and it may have a little more bottom end, which at the end of day l would rather have something with more top end and doesnt tapper off like my lady setup.

Nismoid, my car is making a "claimed" 380RWKW on 25 psi of boost and was built and tuned by the same guys that have done your car. Comparing it to other GTR's running big singles such as a TO4z which is what l wanted to do in the first place but talked out of, stating that a twin setup using these lady -5's will be quicker. From my experience when both cars on a rolling start and in there boost range the big single always wins and feeling you get as you are thrown back in the seat is much more intence. The only benefit l see using my setup is the stock appearance and it may have a little more bottom end, which at the end of day l would rather have something with more top end and doesnt tapper off like my lady setup.

well T04Z cars would be making another 50-60rwkw given they usually run over 400 with ease.

Having been in various cars, im pinned to the seat with -5s.

obviously a bit more lag and another 50rwkw or so is going to feel different.

If the big single is better as you say, then the -5 equipped cars wouldnt be doing the faster lap times compared to the guys with the big singles from other workshops close by :)

lol 360rwkw outta a T88?

-9 equipped car with less power would most likely still be faster :)

If you just want a "rush" drive the car and hold throttle @ 4000rpm and then plent the foot. Same as a laggy turbo :P

yeh the car just got off the boat with that setup and was given a quick tune to see what it could do... D Jetro AFMs were maxing out or sumthing so it was being held back..

still the sensation a big turbo coming on song is very different to twins...

every day driving the twins for sure but from my exp a big single is needed for that the big rush put you back in the seat feeling

Apparently you've never compared the torque and power curves for a car, where often torque will start decreasing near the top end, while power continues to increase.

I know what your getting at, the comment he made was misleading.

HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252

So torque and power are proportional. More power means more torque at the same rpm. Given that we are talking about the same engines we can disregard the rpm part of the equation.

Nismoid, my car is making a "claimed" 380RWKW on 25 psi of boost and was built and tuned by the same guys that have done your car. Comparing it to other GTR's running big singles such as a TO4z which is what l wanted to do in the first place but talked out of, stating that a twin setup using these lady -5's will be quicker. From my experience when both cars on a rolling start and in there boost range the big single always wins and feeling you get as you are thrown back in the seat is much more intence. The only benefit l see using my setup is the stock appearance and it may have a little more bottom end, which at the end of day l would rather have something with more top end and doesnt tapper off like my lady setup.

I have heard a few people say that the single turbos hit harder than the twins. Are you sure the twin turbos compare exactly in size to the single? I mean air is air? Do they both have even quality of exhaust manifolds etc.

Would -10s compare more to a T04Z instead of your -5s?

yer i got 300kw and its boring as, but ive been in other 300kw cars and its wow stuffs me wot the go is.

Hmmm just had a quick think about this. What other cars are you comparing it to? Do they use less revs?

If they use less revs then, they are actually producing more torque to make the same power. The higher torque figure could be what makes them feel more 'wow'.

Torque = 5252 * HP / RPM

If the big single is better as you say, then the -5 equipped cars wouldnt be doing the faster lap times compared to the guys with the big singles from other workshops close by :D

Concidence with car setup, driver etc? I am pretty sure Superlap was dominated by guys with singles on even smaller motors :( The quickest NZ track GTR I am aware of runs a T04Z. The odds are a quickest track GTR would be running twins because the majority run twins anyway...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...