Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im wondering what would be the largest width tyre i could fit on the 9.5 inch wide rims i have on the rear of my GTST.

The guards have been cut out completely.

At the moment I have 265's on there and there is heaps of room between the tyre and the arch. Not sure about on the inner side near the suspension etc.

anybody know the answer to this?

-and i want sizes that will get in there without rubbing on anything at any suspension travel point. (had tyres that rubbed on my old car and it shat me to tears...)

cheers

J

Edited by jjman

for the sake of it. Traction. Looks. bit of everything really.

the rim certainly has room for a wider tyre so it isnt sacrificing function over form..

why would you want to go any bigger than a 265 on a 9.5" wide rim anyway?
why would you want to go any bigger than a 265 on a 9.5" wide rim anyway?

This is true. A 9.5" wide rim is only a touch over 24cm wide, so anything wider than a 245 in reality is getting into overkill. The wider profile tyre you put on, the more the tyre is gonna balloon out over the rim and will probably have a negative effect on overall grip (cornering particularily, as the sidewall flexes). Hope that helps. :)

This is true. A 9.5" wide rim is only a touch over 24cm wide, so anything wider than a 245 in reality is getting into overkill. The wider profile tyre you put on, the more the tyre is gonna balloon out over the rim and will probably have a negative effect on overall grip (cornering particularily, as the sidewall flexes). Hope that helps. :)

?! The 255/40/17 tryres I bought are recommended for an 8-9inch rim, not a 9.5. 265mm are normally recommended for 9.5"

245/45 is probably not recommended by tyre manufacturers for a 9.5" rim.

yeah i think the prior post is a little out.

as per this guys post on a 255 on a 8-9 inch.

at the moment with the 265 (which was the recommended standard fitment from the supplier) the tyre sits pretty much flush with the rim. Perhaps curves in a bit (stretched). So def room for wider without ballooning.

?! The 255/40/17 tryres I bought are recommended for an 8-9inch rim, not a 9.5. 265mm are normally recommended for 9.5"

245/45 is probably not recommended by tyre manufacturers for a 9.5" rim.

This is true. A 9.5" wide rim is only a touch over 24cm wide, so anything wider than a 245 in reality is getting into overkill. The wider profile tyre you put on, the more the tyre is gonna balloon out over the rim and will probably have a negative effect on overall grip (cornering particularily, as the sidewall flexes). Hope that helps. :)

your saying that a 245 tyre has much more traction ability then a 275 or even 305 tyre? although it may balloon, under heavy acceleration there is a much bigger contact path and bigger sidewall. correct me if im wrong.

bigger is always better i thought?

your saying that a 245 tyre has much more traction ability then a 275 or even 305 tyre? although it may balloon, under heavy acceleration there is a much bigger contact path and bigger sidewall. correct me if im wrong.

bigger is always better i thought?

in a straight line yes

round corners those sidewalls are gonna flex more then a gym junkie

yeah i think it will happily take more width and improve performance of both straight line as its fatter, n corners cos it definately wont ballon at 275 or 285 methinks.

perhaps this is a better topic header

-does anybody know the biggest tyre for best best performance on a 9.5 inch rim...

interesting read. I had to get the local tyre shop to fit 235/45/17 tyres on my 9.5" rims 'off the books', due to the rims being half an inch too wide according to the manufacturer data. TBQH I havent noticed any loss of tractability compared to the old 255s. You could probably also say that buying better quality tyres in a thinner size would be more beneficial as well.

If u want more grip, look at your wheel alignment.

Sounds like what yoiu need is a set of wheel spacers to space the wheel out to fill the guards. Muffin topping tyres is not cool at all lol. U wouldn't want to run more than 265. It certainly won't look better, that's for sure!

I was running 265/30x19 on 9.5" rims with room to spare (they looked almost strectched) - I reckon a 275 or 285 would have fitted easy.

Now running 245/35x19 on the same rims because I saved $500 and actually prefer the 35 profile over the 30 profile. (looks, comfort, ride and grip). To be honest you cannot tell the difference looking at it between 245 & 265 except the 245/35 fills the wheel arch more than the 265/30 so looks better.

Another decision to go with the narrower tyre is tyre wear from running negative camber is more pronounced as you go wider...

P.s Falken FK452's are my tyre of choice - they are the best bang for buck out there!

i had 265/30 on a 10" rim fitted fine was a good look not stretched not ballooning... now i got 245 ona 10" still looks good.

275 or 285 on a 9.5" is ridiculous.

Actually 285 is still a recommended size for 9.5" rims. Only when you get up to 295 is a 10" rim the minimum rim width.

Nothing ridiculous about it....

In fact what you have there - 245 on a 10" rim is outside of manufacturer specs; a 245 should go on a 9.5" rim maximum. geek.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...