Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am after a good picture resizer program that will work on Vista Ultimate 64. For use with downsizing large images for posting to teh internets with lossless quality.

Prefer something that can batch process and even handle RAW conversions to JPG. I have CS5 and ACDsee Pro, but wont something lite n' easy for rough and ready batch processing.

I use a Canon 40D...

Photoshop is good, but doesn't do batch resizing.

I use Faststone. Batch resizing, watermarks, borders, renaming, ect ect. Not bad for a free program!

True that,

but I guess all my pics will be different sizing when they are done.

A friend of mine takes photos for nightclubs, he would have to use what you said.

There will be over a few hundred photos a night and to edit them all in 1 go...

"Batch resizing, watermarks, borders, renaming, ect ect" will come in handy for large amounts of pics.

Then all ready to upload to the nightclub website.

Adobe Lightroom is what I use...as I do weddings it is very good for batch processing, crop, resize and basic touch up. I now rarely touch Photoshop as a result unless I'm making a picture from scratch or massive PP.

Does RAW and a variety of conversion options.

edit: also comes in 64bit flavours.

Edited by mickey

Yeah LR is awesome - I do 80% of my PP in there

Must say I've done some tests on an 800px photo and even on high LR wont sharpen it as much as Irfanview

(When you have a photo open in irfanview Ctrl+S is sharpen, in batch you can specify a value from 0 to 100 - suspect a normal Ctrl+S does "20")

What do you mean Photoshop won't batch resize?!

1. If your photos are portrait orientated AND landscape orientated, seperate them so that one or the other doesn't get enlarged.

2. Create an action in photoshop to resize to XXXXXXXX size.

3. File --> Automate --> Batch

4. Run the batch with the resizing action.

5. Laugh.

As regards to sharpening, LR only uses ACR's engine to sharpen. Its really mainly only for capture sharpening. There is also on LR3 the option to enable capture sharpening, plus sharpen when in the "Develop" tab, and then an option when you export for "output sharpening".

I normally use PS to sharpen if need be with either smart sharpen or using a High pass.

To do a high pass, duplicate layer --> Filter --> Other --> high pass.

It will be a grey box. Turn the radius down/up so that you can just see the outlines of your image (it will look for edges i've found) so maybe around 2.0 or something. depends on your photo.

Press ok. Change blend mode to overlay/soft light/hard light.

i use VSO image resizer. mainly because its accesible from left click menu in explorer. dunno about raw etc

Yeah this is just what I was looking for - easy as & does RAW. Had a simliar left click one on XP, a windows powertoys app. Though can't get it for Vista-64.

Works very well and lossless quality for big images... Haven't tried LR. for anything I want to tinker with I'll still go via CS5

Thanks for the help :down:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Seems to be the case mate , still an OK price for a grey import.
    • I’m interested in the carbon diffuser fins and Toshiba MFD screen replacement if they’re still available.
    • @GTSBoy yeah i know it was not the "great" idea but it is and option...but i think i will stay on no BoV rather then trying to make it work with "half" this and that. But that GReddy FV2 is cool...i like that you can make it like stock if you want (and have/make the custom pipes) For other thanks! it was alot of information. But for the sound...a dont rly "like" both of them...specialy if they are loud...but if i "must" choose i would rather have little whooosh rather than sutututu with no BoV....BUT that is what is i gonna get. So for the all info i gather. In my case:  No BoV is not that bad cuz it is stock...and iam used to put N/clutch right after rpms are around 1000 so it should be ok...just need to avoid "big" drops. But i do not have the engine in the car so i do not really know how "bad" or good it is. But as i had that little test drive it looked ok. The atmo BoV should be worse car would dump to much fuel specialy between the shifts...so without proper tune/ECU i dont want that. BUT with that...car should drive ok with no problems right? (i do like there is less piping wih this solution) 🙂 
    • Usually an RB20 won't stay in closed loop idle anyway. The O2 sensor gets too cold, stops swinging.
    • They aren't, but it depends on what interests you about an R32-R34. If it's the front engine I6 turbo that tunes well with a manual transmission an E92 335i 6MT is so incredibly cheap. You can get a super clean one for 20-25k USD tops. Put an LSD in it, tune it, have fun with it. If it's the general idea of AWD + turbo and a manual transmission the 996 Turbo is absolutely much more expensive, it's less practical but it's also basically a complete track-ready car from the factory. At least the Mezger doesn't have heaps of oil control issues. And in the US the 996 Turbo and R33 GTR are roughly the same price these days. 996 maybe a bit more now that the hype has abated for old Skylines here.
×
×
  • Create New...