Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

BC Racing BR vs ISC N1?

Sorry to put you on the spot :P

i would be interested in the comparison as im looking to get some soon

http://g35driver.com/forums/brakes-suspens...ete-review.html

Lol looks like I mite be choosing hsd hrs herd alot gd things about them. What's the difference between isc n1 vs hsd hr's??

Edited by r32man09
Hey

Thinking putting sum new coilovers in my r32 just dunno what to get? My cars and a daily but once everythings done plan to to take it to the track

cheersu

What's your budget? Are you after value for money only or are you after suspension that actually works and competitors use?

What's your budget? Are you after value for money only or are you after suspension that actually works and competitors use?

I have a budget of about $1700 set up for street/track

mate I'm about to ditch my teins for a Bilstein/king spring combo. bilstein shocks can be made height adjustable by adding extra circlip grooves which lock the spring seat onto the shock body. you could use any brand spring on them. Most people who know what there are talking about say bilsteins (aussie spec) have good valving off the shelf for street/track work for GTSt's only GTR's need to be tweaked.

a set of bilsteins come in around $1200 and maybe and extra $100 for extra circlip grooves and a set of springs is around $300-$400.

I've had teins for years and they are good, I fitted BC's into my Mrs 33 and they have excellent adjustability, fitted tein super streets in wrx but bilsteins would have to be the most effective setup in that price range if your serious about lap times.

And i'd be looking at something around 6kg front and 4-4.5kg rear spring wise. (adj. sway bars ideal also)

hope this helps mate

On a budget BC racing is the win i believe. $1199- ive got them really stiff in my rb s13 and had no probs, my good mates also have them in an r32, r33, cefiro and they all agree... brand new 24mths replace warrenty. and they make them for ANYTHING.. Matthew

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...