Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

have googled my my space and searched out the wazu and cant find any info that satisfies.

Story goes along these lines.

Car:32with stock rb25... standard cams, fuel reg, Adaptronic ECU, front mount, 3.5 inch exhaust, profec b controller. rev limiter set 7k.

Use: drift and occasional daily duties.

Desired outcome & power: 240-280rwkw would be nice but also chasing response and not choking top end power. 18psi or so by 3200-3500

I am leaning towards the 3071 or the 3076 from the information i have come across and budget wont allow HKS.

I am uncertain on the rear housing size i am going to use as i am finding so much info from people with only opinion and "educated" knowledge on a similar set up. Really i would love some info and dyno sheets from people with the same or very similar Internal gated set ups (street legalities for the moment) and tuners who are familar with the same thing.

Given NSW state of drift at the moment i am placing an emphasis on response given the tracks like Marulan and the occasional trip up to raliegh raceway. Big track at Eastern Creek and wakefield days also happen so not wanting to choke power at high rpm too. Leaning on internal gate as car is attempting to be street legal to an extent (engineered as 2 seater for cage etc etc already)

I can get hold of a 3071 with .63? rear from a friends Sr for a good price but from my understanding this will be pretty much useless to me power wise after around 5000rpm or so.

any info would be greatly appreciated,

cheers

Brenton

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/336557-rb25-turbo-set-ups/
Share on other sites

did you even see the dyno results thread at the top of this forum?

Clearly he did not :)

OP - Please read the dyno sticky thread, or simply search the turbo ID.

There is that much info in these pages on 3071/3076's that will keep you reading for a month if you want.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...