Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi fella.

I currently have a headunit running 2 front speakers and 2 rear 6x9". I have a 400watt boss amp running my 10" sub. Now my 6x9" speakers sound shithouse....distort to early......what should i do? Im a n00b.

*new 6x9's?

*run another amp for rear speakers? If i run another amp how i do it...i aleady running an amp for sub

cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33697-help-setting-up-my-car-audio/
Share on other sites

yeah, i'd be inclined to ditch the 6x9s like nugget said. 6x9s are only useful for bass when u dont have a sub, but when ur looking for a bit more clarity its time for them to go. Plus if ur running them off ur head unit, they're probably underpowered which doesn't help.

  • 4 weeks later...

yeah chuck the 6x9's out or sell them. 6" splits in the front and 6" coax in the rear, shit all over 6x9's. they distort cos the sound comes out the same spot for low mid and high range, cos you have each speaker behind itself. whereas with split you have a good 6" cone for main low and medium and for high you have a seperaste tweeter. mount the little tweeter set on the backplate of your mirrors, put sound backing/deadning on your 6" cones and it will sound schmick, very good indeeed. you need the sound to come from the front

most people focus on bringing the sound from the back, should be from the front

try and amp all around if you can, amp some and not others is pox and nasty. i agree it is cheaper but if you good sound spend the dollars, mkuch like a car, you want a good car, spend the $ and get good, not 80% good, 100% good

get a fairly stock 4 channel amp and amp your front splits and rears, will sound good

either amp them all or none, amping just subs sounds random and out of whack

worst case yif you are on a tighjt tight budget get front splits, amp them and normal rears. keep the subs or sub amped and amp the front splits. will sound, but better with rears amped too, and not 6x9's amped, 6" coax amped

my system in my 33 =

alpine cdx9807 cd/mp3 head unit 50wx4

alpine 6" pro splits in the front with the tweeter mounted on the mirror mounts

alpine 6" coax in the rear parcel shelf

alpine 2 x 12" subs in the boot, standard box

alpine monobloc amp for the subs, no idea on what wattage, can give model number

alpine 4 channel amp for the front splits and rear coax's

alpine rca to random AINET adapter so i can get sound from my dvd player

total cost including install was 1800 , head unit is aorund 500 ish, subs are fairly expensive, same with splits and coax's, all fairly decent stuff, not the best i agree, but **** it cranks

and also you can crank and stereo but it needs to sound good and clear

i can crank the head unit to like 24 on an original cd audio (not mp3) and it ****ing sounds awesome. mp3 obviousloy not as good, they lack quality.

if youre in melb, can give a demo

no offence, shop around, i wouldnt goto strathfield. yeah their sales droids will say oh we can sell u this setup for 200 cash less, blah blah. less cash price existed in 1980, not anymore

speak to some audio buff's, find out what u want, get a non biased opinion. ask fhrx. get work out a budget and say i want this from this

dont goto them with a problem, goto them with a requirement, let them work out how to make it happen and give you the solution

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...