Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My engine builder was finishing off my 26/30 today when one of the tomei camsahfts snapped.

Has this has happened to anyone else???

I am certain this is not an insullation fault or damage due to transit as the boxes were in mint condition and there is not a mark on the camshaft.

The intake cam will be crack tested tomorrow.

Have a look at the photos, please - let me know yr thoughts. Note no oil was added to the break. The clean/fresh bit of metal in the centre was how it looked when it broke.

post-29626-1285058702_thumb.jpg

post-29626-1285058785_thumb.jpg

post-29626-1285058864_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/337672-tomei-camshaft-failure/
Share on other sites

If you say thats exactly how it looked when it snapped then it's definatley a problem with the casting. I don't know what tomei's quality control in reguards to crack testing is but this one slipped through. The dull outer area would be coolant that seeped into the crack during grinding. You can snap a perfectly good cast cam from improper installation or removal but any micro cracks in the castin will make it snap a lot easier.

happened to one of my friend's car. Engine's freshly built. Mechanic found one cam gear was very spinable while installing timing belt. Brand new cam shaft in half on engine stand. I would say its manufacturing related. Email Tomei and ask them for exchange.

instilation error is the only way.

from the look of it, where it has broken is the loaded lobe when instaling. ie cam clocked in the timing of #1 tdc.. they can get caught on the front thrust bearing/cap if not done very carefully.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...