Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After cleaning my intake of oily sludge, I installed a catch can filter and my setup is as follows:

The exhaust side rocker cover pipe goes into the catch can, then the catch can feeds back into the pre-turbo inlet pipe.

The rocker cover to intake manifold pipe is now blocked.

Am I correct in thinking when pressure is created in the rocker cover it will flow through out the rocker cover, into the catch can, and back into the intake?

On futher thinking, on a stock setup does gas flow both ways through the turbo inlet PCV pipe? If the manifold is under vacuum then does it draw air through the turbo inlet, through the rocker cover then into the manifold?

I just want to check if there is any problems with my setup.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/339277-is-my-knowledge-of-the-pcv-correct/
Share on other sites

You only block the PCV valve if venting to atmosphere.

I dont understand sorry.

Ill elaborate: If I leave the rocker cover to manifold pipe on, then my oil catch can on the exhaust side seems useless since the manifold will be sucking in oil mist under vacuum?

I dont understand sorry.

Ill elaborate: If I leave the rocker cover to manifold pipe on, then my oil catch can on the exhaust side seems useless since the manifold will be sucking in oil mist under vacuum?

By blocking the pipe from cam cover to plenum, you have effectively block the PCV valve. You only do this if you are running your catch can venting to atmosphere (i.e. NOT returning to the intake).

The PCV valve is designed to suck air from the cam cover when the engine is under vacuum to relieve any pressure accumulated in the crankcase while on boost (that's why it is called a Positive Crankcase Ventilation valve).

The two main way of hooking up a "catch can" are:

1) run both cam cover breathers to "catch can" then "catch can" to intake pipe, leave PCV connected

2) block PCV, run both cam cover breathers to "catch can" then vent to atmosphere via a small filter on the can (this is illegal but prevents any oil mist getting in to the engine)

Really, in option 1 you should be running an "oil/air separator" as opposed to just a "catch can".. a separator is baffled and filled with a medium (such as steel wool) to aid the separation of oil and air so that the air that is returned to the intake doesn't contain oil.

Edited by bubba
The PCV valve is designed to suck air from the cam cover when the engine is under vacuum to relieve any pressure accumulated in the crankcase while on boost (that's why it is called a Positive Crankcase Ventilation valve).

Well yes and no. The PCV is mostly there to vent crankcase pressure during the over-run. ie. when you come off the throttle at high revs. The exhaust side into the turbo inlet works well when the turbo is on boost and therefore the area before the turbo inlet is negative pressure compared to ...well pretty much everything.

When the throttle is shut then this low pressure area is no longer low pressure. Hence the PCV valve opens when the intake manifold is lower pressure than in the cam covers - which is when the throttle is shut (or partially open).

Currently your car is only venting pressure from the cam covers when on boost - this is OK but not ideal. Think of all that time spend under vacuum when the PCV valve would be open.

Edited by simpletool
Really, in option 1 you should be running an "oil/air separator" as opposed to just a "catch can".. a separator is baffled and filled with a medium (such as steel wool) to aid the separation of oil and air so that the air that is returned to the intake doesn't contain oil.

Yes thats exactly what I made.

Well yes and no. The PCV is mostly there to vent crankcase pressure during the over-run. ie. when you come off the throttle at high revs. The exhaust side into the turbo inlet works well when the turbo is on boost and therefore the area before the turbo inlet is negative pressure compared to ...well pretty much everything.

When the throttle is shut then this low pressure area is no longer low pressure. Hence the PCV valve opens when the intake manifold is lower pressure than in the cam covers - which is when the throttle is shut (or partially open).

Currently your car is only venting pressure from the cam covers when on boost - this is OK but not ideal. Think of all that time spend under vacuum when the PCV valve would be open.

Ok now everything makes much more sense.

So ideally I will have to make another filter/catch can for the PCV hose.

Edited by zoomzoom
Currently your car is only venting pressure from the cam covers when on boost - this is OK but not ideal. Think of all that time spend under vacuum when the PCV valve would be open.

no its venting all the time through the catch can and intake pipe. the only time the intake pipe isnt sucking air is when the engine is off

is it law to have a working pcv in oz ? if so block it . so it looks stock .

if not throw it away and get 2 bungs that fit

If you do this and your crankcase has no way of venting pressure the oil will be pushed past the oil seals and it will make quite a mess.

then my oil catch can on the exhaust side seems useless since the manifold will be sucking in oil mist under vacuum?
There's nothing wrong with that. The major problem is when you are on boost, and you feed oil mist from the rocker covers to the intake side of the turbo, then into the cylinders. Oil in the air/fuel mix significantly lowers the effective octane rating of the mix, and thus you risk detonation. When the engine is under vacuum, ie off boost, the effect of any oil vapour, entering via the PCV valve, on the effective octane rating is minimal, and thus the risk of detonation is extremely small.

lachlanw, yes in Oz it is a requirement to have a working PCV system, same as it is a requirement to have a catalytic converter, and all the other anti-pollution equipment.

I don't think it's a case of having a "working PCV system" as that is more the manufacturer designing something in to control something else in the engine (i.e. a valve to control the pressurising of the crankcase). I believe it's illegal due to the fact that whatever goes in the intake, has to come out through the catalytic converter. Nothing can be vented before then so you can't run your breather system venting to atmosphere, just like you can't run your bov venting to atmosphere. That's also the reason that screamer pipes are illegal, but you could make one legal if you mounted a small cat converter to it and muffled it to keep it below the accepted noise level.

Note: can't can be read as shouldn't

Edited by bubba

run a air/ oil seperator in the line between the cam covers and the turbo air pipe . block pcv . end of storey

maggtymagoo your a tard . the line fromt he cam covers to the turbo intake will flow more than ebough to not have any pressur ein the engine . and its always under partial vacuum .

do you want oil in your intake manifold and higher knock values ? no . so f**k the pcv

  • 2 weeks later...
There's nothing wrong with that. The major problem is when you are on boost, and you feed oil mist from the rocker covers to the intake side of the turbo, then into the cylinders. Oil in the air/fuel mix significantly lowers the effective octane rating of the mix, and thus you risk detonation. When the engine is under vacuum, ie off boost, the effect of any oil vapour, entering via the PCV valve, on the effective octane rating is minimal, and thus the risk of detonation is extremely small.

lachlanw, yes in Oz it is a requirement to have a working PCV system, same as it is a requirement to have a catalytic converter, and all the other anti-pollution equipment.

Just to bump this again, is the rocker cover to turbo inlet vent pipe enough to relieve pressure? If so then why would nissan even bother to fit the rocker cover to manifold pipe? Does it significantly lower the pressure in the engine to stop oil being pulled into the cylinders when under light load?

I ask only because my idle wavers with the RC to manifold pipe functioning, whereas the idle is perfect with the pipe blocked. I put a 3mm restrictor in the pipe to reduce the amount of air the manifold is pulling in under vacuum. It did help, but it seems easier now just to get rid of the whole pipe.

Alas, nissan is full of engineers and I am not, so I am hestitant to block it.

Edited by zoomzoom

I had mine blocked for a while, but after a few months it was beginning to smoke a bit out the exhaust. I think just venting straight to atmo, in my application wasnt enough. As i had the Exhaust cam cover to turbo pipe blocked also.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...