Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

had my r34 gtr v spec tuned today at maz fix in brisbane...

final power was 408.3rwhp or 304.5rwks at 1.3 bar boost....pretty happy....

we worked out about 100rwhp gain or 75rwkw gain...with tuning...

going to run it to see if it can do an 11 sec pass. best with base power fc map was 12.5 at 110mph...at 1 bar boost .

i plan to run higher boost when i get some good fuel and a twin plate clutch...

mods are: hks 2530's with hks dumps

hks type r intercooler

nismo 280lt fuel pump & reg

700cc sard inj

power fc with z32 afms and pod filters.

denso iq22 plugs.

lightened flywheel and upgraded single plate.

cees short shift.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33984-r34-gtr-tune-results/
Share on other sites

not good enough mark...you need a nismo twin clutch :D ...did you end up getting it working on the 34 power fc?

yes got the power fc working was the immobilizer as we thought...

got the parts from dwane... thanks for that...

still got your nismo twin plate....

cheers..

Hi Mark, good effort, as I said for a combo road/track car 2530's rule. I noticed the DD was not in Shoot Out mode. How hot was yesterday up there? It was 37 degrees here, that's almost a 10% horsepower loss.

Hi mesh, don't underestimate the benefits of upgrading the dumps. Based on our experience 300 rwkw is a good rule of thumb limit for the std R34 GTR intercooler, an R32 intercooler is not quite as good. So I'd save up a little more and do it properly.

Hi Micko, I suspect that not holding boost could be related to the std intercooler, there is around 5 to 6 psi of restriction in the std inlet system at 45 lbs per minute of airflow. The I/C is about 3 to 4 psi of that. I believe it's time for an intercooler upgrade. Just removing the restriction will give you another 20 or so rwkw, plus you will have the increased efficiency (lower air temps) from the turbos. I wouldn't anticipate too much gain from more cooling in the I/C, the std one is hard to beat in that area.

Hope that adds to this interesting thread.

Great work mark - very nice curve. Can't wait until I can get myself some of these turbo's.

Just as a side point, how have you found the C's shifter? I was just about to order one of these in the next few weeks (if negun answer their emails!) but I haven't known anyone who has used them over the nismo one on a R34.

took it for a spin late last night.. wow...

dont know if the gearbox will like that much power... what are the 6speed getrag boxes power limits...????

had the boost set to 16psi and only had about 10 to 15 on the knock readings in the power fc...seems like a great tune to me... no flat spots or surging at cruise either...

i would highly recommend Maz Fix at underwood in brisbane.. they are starting to do a few more skylines mainly with Micro tech ecu but his power fc tunes are pretty good also...

they tune the brisbane streetmachines gtr with a power fc also and it runs 10s all day....

thats good result for dwanes car also.. what boost did he run to get 305rwks....???

hows your beast going ylwgtr2...

my next step will be some cams maybe 264 9.1mm hks or tommi cams...

snowman the cees shifter is great, i believe it is 30% shorter shift where as the nismo one is only 15 % shorter..

if you can find a cees shifter grab it as they dont make shifters any more.. went bust...

think mine was 500bucks landed....

nengun is a bit slow at present he must be busy... but he will answer its usually worth the wait.....

Nice work Mark - gotta love those turbs eh?

 

I managed 415rwhp but could not hold boost very well. Still using stock cooler & afms but otherwise same mods.

 

What are you using for boost control? Got powerfc boost control but thing wont work for me...

i am using a blitz id 111 boost controller.. its very fast acting and hlods boost at 16 psi so far easy.....

Hi Mark, good effort, as I said for a combo road/track car 2530's rule.  I noticed the DD was not in Shoot Out mode.  How hot was yesterday up there?  It was 37 degrees here, that's almost a 10% horsepower loss.

Hi mesh, don't underestimate the benefits of upgrading the dumps.  Based on our experience 300 rwkw is a good rule of thumb limit for the std R34 GTR intercooler, an R32 intercooler is not quite as good.  So I'd save up a little more and do it properly.

Hi Micko, I suspect that not holding boost could be related to the std intercooler, there is around 5 to 6 psi of restriction in the std inlet system at 45 lbs per minute of airflow.  The I/C is about 3 to 4 psi of that.  I believe it's time for an intercooler upgrade.  Just removing the restriction will give you another 20 or so rwkw, plus you will have the increased efficiency (lower air temps) from the turbos.  I wouldn't anticipate too much gain from more cooling in the I/C, the std one is hard to beat in that area.

Hope that adds to this interesting thread.

it was 32 to 34 deg in brisbane yesterday and he started tuning at about 10am ..

so i would imagine it was quite hot when the final run was done... hot day, hot engine... etc etc..

last night was good at 10 pm intercooler air temp at 30 deg and colder air it went really hard...

what do you think the getrag 6speed box will handle safely.. power wise...???

with the right fuel what boost level do think is possible with my setup... it has 16psi now with 10 % tolulene....??

thanks for all your help along the way....

Hi Mark, good effort, as I said for a combo road/track car 2530's rule.  I noticed the DD was not in Shoot Out mode.  How hot was yesterday up there?  It was 37 degrees here, that's almost a 10% horsepower loss.

Hi mesh, don't underestimate the benefits of upgrading the dumps.  Based on our experience 300 rwkw is a good rule of thumb limit for the std R34 GTR intercooler, an R32 intercooler is not quite as good.  So I'd save up a little more and do it properly.

Hi Micko, I suspect that not holding boost could be related to the std intercooler, there is around 5 to 6 psi of restriction in the std inlet system at 45 lbs per minute of airflow.  The I/C is about 3 to 4 psi of that.  I believe it's time for an intercooler upgrade.  Just removing the restriction will give you another 20 or so rwkw, plus you will have the increased efficiency (lower air temps) from the turbos.  I wouldn't anticipate too much gain from more cooling in the I/C, the std one is hard to beat in that area.

Hope that adds to this interesting thread.

Hmmmm...

If you're only ("only"... hehe :Oops: ) getting 304rwkw out of 2530s, perhaps my GT-SS turbos are too small :) I was hoping for 300kw @ all four from the GT-SS...

Hmmmm...

i think you would need high boost to get the gt ss turbos to 300rwks. but i think it can be done...

just remember my run was at 16psi on a 32 deg day... so with 20 psi boost should see some more power maybe 330 rwks or so...

i am happy with 2530's they spool at about 4000 to 4200rpm and go crazy after that all the way to 8500rpm...

for circuit work gtss would be a bit less laggy but only maybe 500 rpm....

cheers..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
×
×
  • Create New...