Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I heard that Single Turbo Supras are pretty wild. Do they mod a N/A engine, or do they mod a twin turbo engine to get these single turbo supras.

I deal suituation, 6speed N/A SZ-R Supra (1993ish) with 1 big turbo.

Anyone know any information on this?

Cheers

(if I have posted this in the wrong thread, feel free to move)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34152-question-on-single-turbo-supras/
Share on other sites

Turbocharging a SZ is both a waste of money .. and won't give you the required results unless big bucks are spent. The TT engine is a monster internally, and quite different. You can pick up a TT Supra for under $30k these days, and the NA are often around $20k. To turbo the N/A will cost you probably more than $10k, and it won't be done that well. Its similar to turbocharging a GTS n/a skyline. Can be done, but do you want to bother?

My friend investigated it (and to him money wasn't even really an option), ended up selling the SZ and buying a GTR :) Smart

DJ984 - The twin sequentials use one small and one larger turbo. The smaller one does not have a wastegate and it runs out of puff somwere in the rev range (not sure were) and this is were the bigger one is already workin to take over. Very heavy and tricky setup so big single on a 3 litre which will support 500+ HP on stock internals is usually the path taken.

Cheers

ok, fair enough... so they're both driven of 3 cylinders each?... (like a gtr set-up) it's just that one's small and the other's big in-order to have the best of both worlds (quick "off-the-mark" accelleration + top end power and speed)???

SZ = was the NA

GZ = TT with leather seats, cruise, active spoliers

RZ = TT with cloth seats, airbags and sometimes an active spoiler

RZ-S = was a TT with electric seats but none of the other toys

are you sure its a SZ-R and not a RZ-S? It's very expensive to turbo the 2jzge motor.

The cylinder head, camshafts, intake manifolds, and exhaust manifolds are completely different between the GTE and GE engines.

The intake manifolds are also completely different in design, and again the GTE versions will not fit directly on the GE cylinder head.

The GE engine was fitted with a distributor ignition system, while the GTE engine was fitted with the latest high output coil-on-plug ignition system.

As easy as it would be for the aftermarket, the factory Twin Turbo system from the GTE engine will not fit on the GE as the bolt patterns are completely different.

The Non Turbo Supra received two transmission choices, the four-speed A340 automatic and the five-speed W58 manual. Both can handle mild transmission upgrades in power to about 400 RWHP before problems begin to surface. ( hmm yours is a 6sp )

But then ive read

1996 - the 6 Speed manual transmission in the turbo model was dropped due to emmision regulations. ( so it is possible to have a 6spd before 1996 )

but then

1997 - Return of the six-speed manual transmission.

  • 8 months later...
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...