Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I bought an Oil temp meter and my mechanic said that i need to drill a hold in my oil sump to fit the oil temp sensor, an easier alternative is to buy a "sandwich plate" to put in between the oil filter.

Do you know where I can find one of these ? And how much do they cost ?

thanks !

:mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34227-oil-temp-need-help/
Share on other sites

the problem is, i dont want to drain the oil as i've just serviced my car last week.

My mechanic told me to get the plate to put in between the oil filter and the engine.

So i could put my oil temp sensor thus not having to remove the oil and make the job much easier.

So i'm looking for this plate thingy now ..

:cheers:

You will have to remove the oil filter which will spill oil out anyway.

You can get sandwich plates at revolution race gear. I got one which is hooked up to my oil cooler and remote oil filter relocator.

Unless the sensor has or can have a 90 deg bend in it id be careful mounting it in the sump plug location...you never know when you are going to run over something.

Revolution Racegear/Earls/Speedshops sell sandwhich plates for $50-60, not that expensive, the cheaper ones may require you to tap a hole though... If you dont want to run an oil cooler at this time, just by pass the oultet straight to the inlet, makes upgrading with an oil cooler easier down the track once you are horrified by the temps your oil sees :cheers:

Actually sell the temp gauge and put the money towards a nice 19 row oil cooler, then oil temp isnt a worry. :D

YOur gunna have to drain some of the oil either way.

Using a plate would be the best way I'd say. I went for the adaptor in the sump plug.

If you go the sump plug way, you'll have to buy one and then take it too a machine shop and get the right thread put on it - I looked EVERYWHERE and couldn't find one.....

I think it was a 10x1.25 thread ?? Best checking for yourself though.

J

does anyone have revolution race gear's number ?

I dont need an oil cooler at the moment because my car is fairly stock-ish.

project will only commence once i have saved enough money (poor student here :D )

My friend told me not to drill the hole because if i scrap it, then oil would come out

and stuff, besides my car is too low to take any risks .. :cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...