Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I disagree, i had 1000's maxed at 403rwkw so i dont think 800's will cut it

Mind you thats 400cc bigger engine

Try it and see

Are you sure it wasn't your fuel pumped that maxed out?

I've got SARD 1000cc injectors, 2x Bosch 044 Surge Tank setup and 1xBosch 044 for pick up.

Car made 425awkw at 25psi and injectors were running around 75-80% on E-85. Car was running 30psi but dropped down to 25psi and from what i was told, it wasn't my injectors that were limiting the car but because there was a drop in boost due to an exhaust restriction.

Going back this weekend to run 30psi to try and make upwards of 450+awkw and i'll come back to see how much power i can make before my injectors max out!

Fuel pumps were fine, with only an injector change it made more

I am just finding it odd that your 1000cc injectors maxed out at 405rwkw and mine is still around 70-80 @ 425awkw.

As i said i'll give you a final figure after Saturday as to how much power i can actually make on 1000cc with E-85 @ 30psi

To answer the question with the 800cc injectors i think it is good for around 400kw on E-85

Not sure if you will need a fuel pump though, maybe its best to speak to your tuner who is tuning it for you.

http://www.powertune.com.au/dynodiaries.html

Dyno sheet is there with the 424.5 awkw

"This R34 GT-R came in for a fuel system overhaul and a dual map tune to get the most out of its twin HKS GT-RS’s, not surprisingly though, the owner hasn’t been back for the 98 tune, neither do most power addicts once they have experienced E85. We decked it out with a custom surge tank that sits above the rear diffuser with 2 x Bosch 044’s and a set of 1000cc injectors.

There was a restriction at an exhaust flange which prevented it from holding boost, yet, it still made a very impressive 424kW at all four wheels (see graph), a figure which initially didn’t impress the owner. After the test drive there was a change in attitude, his words were “Gee, it revs out quick” and it wasn’t because we changed the ratios on him. In a nutshell this car would run a flat 11 to high 10 second quarter mile time in full street trim, and that’s before sorting the exhaust restriction"

I was told i could still make about a 40awkw gain from 25psi -> 30psi but we'll see how much it makes when i head back. Exhaust has now been decatted and running a 94mm straight through exhaust.

Interesting to see how it goes..

Hang on a sec... 425 @ wheels/25psi/GT-RS? :P

-5s will do that on E85 on the same boost (given they do 380 on PULP) - something is amiss here.

Be interesting to see what 30psi does, hoping to see more than 40kw :P

http://powertune.com.au/gordongtr-e85.jpg

Have a look at the dyno sheet! Something is a miss for sure!

The reason for the power is due to the exhaust restriction as after the front pipe i had a 3" flange going on to the metalcat catalylic converter so like a bottle neck it seemed that was probably the issue and my blitz icolor is set to 2bar of boost too :P

So i have installed my 94mm decat pipe that came with the exhaust so we'll see what difference it will make catless? :P

Although i feel the car can probably make close to 500awkw, i've got a feeling my injectors will starting maxing out around 460-480awkw and i am not willing to buy another set of injectors to prove i can make more lol.

However, it is just an end figure, as long as the power delivery continues to be as smooth and responsive all the way to 9000rpm i'll be happy!!! Highly recommend Powertune Australia for tuning though! :)

Edited by destrukshn

let me guess. trust power evolution II, exhaust? great exhaust and will definitely make the power. of all the 'off the shelf' jap exhausts they are the grand daddy for flow while still giving some semblance of muffling! I have one for my 32 GTR. it currently runs a 90mm titanium trust exhaust but seriously thinking about putting on the power evo even though it's mild steel... they sound great too.

love the under car surge and pump set-up. very neat. nice work. :P

The graph looks quite nice too. stil a bit laggy. but once it picks up it's fantastic. certainly much better than most 2.6 GTRS set-ups. interesting to compare to the 2L GTI-R just above yours. even with 600cc less engine it makes about the same power up to about 135km/h. in fact at some points low down it's ahead slightly I think! not much of a contest for outright power though... :P

let me guess. trust power evolution II, exhaust? great exhaust and will definitely make the power. of all the 'off the shelf' jap exhausts they are the grand daddy for flow while still giving some semblance of muffling! I have one for my 32 GTR. it currently runs a 90mm titanium trust exhaust but seriously thinking about putting on the power evo even though it's mild steel... they sound great too.

love the under car surge and pump set-up. very neat. nice work. :P

The graph looks quite nice too. stil a bit laggy. but once it picks up it's fantastic. certainly much better than most 2.6 GTRS set-ups. interesting to compare to the 2L GTI-R just above yours. even with 600cc less engine it makes about the same power up to about 135km/h. in fact at some points low down it's ahead slightly I think! not much of a contest for outright power though... :P

Hi Baron, welcome to the conversation. You're correct indeed as i am running the TRUST TR Power Evolution II 94mm drag exhaust with v-band flanges. It is the big daddy of exhausts isnt it? :)

Thanks, the surge tank actually looks a lot better all covered up! What actually happened after that picture was i got them to cover up the pumps so you're not able to see them at all with a gap on the front side so they still have air for cooling.

It is a bit laggy i admit but i feel it isnt that much laggier than when i had the 2530s. Though if you're just driving from 1st gear up to 9000rpm and then 2nd gear it doesnt feel that laggy and streetable. Definitely with the built motor, boost and e-85 its definitely awesome and from what people have explained with the HKS GT-RS and 2.6L, i feel after driving my car i think i could change anyones mind about using the GT-RS's on 2.6L though only on a rebuilt motor motor with headwork and again i recommend Powertune's tune to any GT-R as you'll be impressed!!

That Pulsar with a GTI-R motor? Haha its no match muahahaha big daddy is here! ;)

Edited by destrukshn

as far as 2.6 GTRS set-ups go, yours with E85 looks very good. and yes it doesn't look much laggier than an average 2530 set-up either. the simple fact is with a 2.6L engine you are never going to have 600hp + and get standard engine response. it's impossible and even standard GTRs are fairly gutless under 4,500rpm. your power may be a bit lower than average GTRS @ 25psi but that could be due to the 3inch flanged cat. you may find it makes more power even at 25psi without that restriction but even if not 425awkw is not to be sneezed at. it's a buttload of power in any car. and at those power levels even a small 10% variance in dyno numbers is nearly 50kw differece so on another dyno you could easily 'get' 460kw which is about right. also your's is AWKW not RWKW which is often quoted.

all round it looks like a very nice set-up and a pretty good shape to the power graph too.

haha thanks Baron! Apart from looking good it also feels very good. lol compared to when i had the 2530s with 260/260 Tomei poncams i feel these are just that little bit laggier but the power that unleashes after it hits full boost my oh my i shall not comment any further... however with the 2530s you feel up to around 6000-8000rpm it dies out but maybe i am just a power junkie lol but the gt-rs's keep revving and all the way to 9000rpm and i still feel it wants more revs!!

Well i'll give an update as soon as i run 30psi on their dyno on Saturday and we'll see how it goes catless. Yes Powertune's dyno is a 4wd dyno! But i am waiting to test the car on another awd dyno to see what difference it makes as he does tell me that his dyno has lower readings but as i said, its only a figure and it doesnt mean that much when it comes to street drivability.

I am just finding it odd that your 1000cc injectors maxed out at 405rwkw and mine is still around 70-80 @ 425awkw.

As i said i'll give you a final figure after Saturday as to how much power i can actually make on 1000cc with E-85 @ 30psi

To answer the question with the 800cc injectors i think it is good for around 400kw on E-85

Not sure if you will need a fuel pump though, maybe its best to speak to your tuner who is tuning it for you.

Remember mines a 3L though

Made another 50kw odd with no fuel pump change. I have twin 044's with an 044 lift

I was a bit concerned about fuel pressure on the day but it was fine, for the next tune I'm not so sure

Remember mines a 3L though

Made another 50kw odd with no fuel pump change. I have twin 044's with an 044 lift

I was a bit concerned about fuel pressure on the day but it was fine, for the next tune I'm not so sure

lol after i responded i remembered you had a 30/26, fair enough :)

You going to add another fuel pump and 2000cc injectors? :(

Whats the tuneup like on the 2000's with 98 octane or do you run 100% E85 now?

tried a microtech with the 2000cc's and it had a heart attack :P plugged in a pfc to another car with 2000cc and it idle like stock :P....... the microtech did not seem to have enough injector trim, but we will see down the track.

It's got 2000's now already :dry:

Hopefully a 3rd supply pump isn't needed. If it is, I probably won't do it and just stick with whatever 2 can do

What is the price for 2000's these days. I have 1000's already and 2x 044 feeding the rail. Wouldnt mind doing the upgrade before my engine comes back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for all that information I appreciate it. To answer your questions: - Yep that's what I mean. These guys are professional painters to so I must be missing something. It's a bit hard to explain. - With the primer landing on clearcoat, I make sure that the surrounding clearcoat is scuffed to 240 grit as my epoxy primer says that I only need to sand the area to 240 grit. - Yeah so similar to the first question, assuming that the paint landed on the unscuffed clearcoat because I've seen that happen. - Yep I want to prep the surface in that order. Only reason because epoxy primer will protect it from rust and I need that atm with this crappy Sydney weather. I think I was worried about time, if I try to put the filler down but screw it up somehow and I don't have time to sand it off and reapply it then need to put primer later that it might start to rust again so I wanted to apply the primer as quick as possible to not deal with rust.  - My car has heaps of small dents, that definitely need filler but are you also sanding the area to 240 grit to fill it in with filler? I always thought you have to go to bare metal for filler to stick but that contradicts the point then that you can put filler on epoxy primer.  If you aren't going to bare metal, AND not putting epoxy primer how are you making the dent stick to the paint?
    • I did. I went to a suspension guy and he told me because I don't have adjustable camber arms it's the reason why my car veers towards the left if I take my hands off the wheel but if I drive my other every day car and take my hands off the steering wheel it goes completely straight. I think it's common with Skyline's. In order to fix the problem, I likely need gktech camber arms then nismo bushes since I have poly bushes atm, then a wheel alignment after that. With my car if I take my hands off the steering wheel on a really bumpy road before stopping at a light I have to hold my steering wheel somewhat tight otherwise my car will legit just go completely in the other direction quite quickly and I'll slam into something lol instead of stopping straight. I Believe this YouTuber had the same issue and fixed it with gktech arms. At timestmap 6:05 he talks about how the car doesn't veer anymore after installing these arms.  
    • hello! does anyone have a schematic that shows how to test the blower motor resistor for the vac system? i believe the part# is 27761-15U00. I think the resistor is toast, but would like to be able to test it somehow before i embark on the journey to find a new one. cheers! 27761-15U00
    • I don't know the answer to this, but did you have a look at the parts diagrams on amayama.com and see what they list around it for your car? As an example this should be it on my car. That's how I would check for required clips and things like that. But, I take no responsibility for you ending up with a box full of random OEM hoses, washers and clips after going down that path a few times. This definitely has never happened to me  
    • Most driving should* be done on one side of single lane divided roads. In the RHD world, you drive on the left side of the dividing line and the road is probably cambered equally on both sides. So your side of the road slopes away to the left. The same is true for the LHD world, just everything swapped to the other side and opposite slope. With a perfectly neutral, straight ahead wheel alignment designed to drive straight on a perfectly flat surface (or at least one that is level on the left-right axis, even if it has some slope in the fore-aft axis) you will not be able to drive on a cambered road without the car wanting to drift down the camber. You will need to add steering input in the opposite direction all the time. This is annoying. The solution has always been to set the camber and/or the caster to produce a continuous turning force in the opposite direction of the camber. The car will drive straight on the kind of camber for which it was set up, presumably as described in the top paragraph. But.... when the car is set up this way, as soon as you get into a lane, usually on a multi-lane surface road or highway, where the camber is not as presumed during setup, the car will usually pull to one side. In the RHD world, if you are in the fast lane on a big divided road, you are probably on the opposite camber compared to what the car was set up for (ie, sloping down to the right) and the combination of the setup and that camber will make the car want to go right pretty hard. Even a perfectly flat lane will tend to want to go right. There's no getting around it. Civil engineers who know their stuff (which is not an assumption that can always be made) will attempt to keep the variation in camber across a multi-lane road as small as possible, and if they can will attempt to make the fast lane as close to flat, or even cambered in the same direction as all the other lanes. This takes a lot of planning for drainage, control of levels, ability to deal with the elevation changes that occur at road junctions, etc etc. So it's not trivial to get it right. When they do make it work, then the annoyance is reduced, along with tyre wear, fuel consumption, etc. In theory, the civil engineers are supposed to worry about those aspects of road design also. * This used to be true, but now with very large highway systems, even just multi-lane surface roads running everywhere, it is less true now than it was, but the old assumption is the basis for describing the phenomenon, so let's just run with it for the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...