Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks for all the info. Good read. Sounds like I may as well stick with the GT25/30 for now. Like I said I don't have any problems with it at the top end.

Are there any decent twin-turbo SR20s around? Would there be any significant gains in response/low end? Or more hassle than it's worth?

Edit: To the above, I have no preference to brand; are there any good rivals in the low end response catagory?

Edited by Nissinja
Also that GT2860RS is virtually the same as a 2530 but is compressor wheel is a slightly more modern design .

In an effort to utilize an existing thread;

I am considering running 2 x 2860RS discos on my 1JZ

I am confined to my .48 AR turbine housings however wont have much hassle going to a better compressor housing (oem housings are .30 AR for compressor).

I am thinking of using the native .60 t04 cover off the disco itself, however fear it may create an inbalance with the turbine housing. Alternatively I was thinking of machining a set of 2560 covers on (still .60 AR).

While we are on the topic of SR20 based turbos, what are some opinions on the above?

I am figuring seeing as 2530s have an outright flow of say 450rwkw in max tune, perhaps the right comp cover in my .48 housings would yield a potential within 100rwkw difference? I am assuming the compressor cover will be the deal breaker.

Thanks for all the info. Good read. Sounds like I may as well stick with the GT25/30 for now. Like I said I don't have any problems with it at the top end.

Are there any decent twin-turbo SR20s around? Would there be any significant gains in response/low end? Or more hassle than it's worth?

Edit: To the above, I have no preference to brand; are there any good rivals in the low end response catagory?

zero low end and response with a twin :) i had a twin sr20 (tdo4's) on display in my old autobarn shop in sa for a few years

Well GT2530s have always had 0.64 A/R GT28 based turbine housings and I pretty sure a variation of a T04B sized compressor housing , the way to tell is to see of the comp housing has and adapter ring between the bearing housing and the comp housing . If the comp housing is held in by the circlip directly on the back of the comp housing its smaller .

For OE RB26 sized housings possibly 34GTR GT2556R's or 707160-9/GTSS turbos should be more responsive .

I'd have thought a single turbo conversion on a 1JZ would be simpler , much simpler that the sequential turbos I thought those engines had . Maybe look at the new BW range for something suitable .

I can't see any advantage of parallel twins on an inline four , You'd need to have one feed off cylinders 1-4 and the other off 2-3 so one would be on top of the other in a plumbing nightmare . I reckon you could do better with a custom manifold and an Evo X specific TS TIW GT3076R .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...