Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

specs

GT3071R garrett ball bearing turbo

comp housing

0.50a/r

inducer wheel diameter 53.1mm

exducer wheel diameter 71.0mm

trim 56

exhaust housing

0.64 a/r (mod 21u)

turbine wheel diameter 56.5mm

trim 84

Was told and I thought should make 260...but it isnt, thinking it would be better suited to a rb20

Edited by Arthur T3
exhaust housing

0.64 a/r (mod 21u)

turbine wheel diameter 56.5mm

trim 84

Was told and I thought should make 260...but it isnt

So what is it making - somewhere around 230-235?

Looks like you've got a milled (high flowed) OEM turbine housing. If so I think you'll find they're somewhat smaller than 0.63, but there is no marking on them to indicate. Might not be a good match with the rotor, can lead to a bit of choking and below expected outputs.

You might do well to consult with a turbo manufacturer/remanufacturer about housings - perhaps Hypergear can help out if that is the culprit.

yeah its making a solid 240..

and spoke to hypergear a while back who straight up recomended a bigger rear housing..

But for that amount of trouble Id consider just getting a better turbo..

might just run some e85 see what happens...I got no problems with the power ,thought it would be a tad more responsive for what it is really. And its kind of odd having a turbo that comes onto boost but doesnt really make alot more power than it did b4..It pulls hard but there's not that boost kick .Not to worry..I should stop complaining and just be happy its running again. ;)

its very tempting, I dont think there is any point trying to get anything more out of this one pretty much maxed out already..

And i could probably get the same power from a 2871 with far better response

I have a bad habit of jumping in the deep end, i did plenty of research after i bought it.. ;)

Edited by Arthur T3
It pulls hard but there's not that boost kick .Not to worry..I should stop complaining and just be happy its running again.

It helps to know what characteristics you want before you start. Some combinations are deceptively fast ie. cover ground quickly and don't feel it. Despite the power number, it might deliver the goods if you can directly compare with something else.

I'd be interested to see a dyno sheet, even if it only tells part of the story... :rofl:

and spoke to hypergear a while back who straight up recomended a bigger rear housing..

But for that amount of trouble Id consider just getting a better turbo..

Well you've already asked someone who is a specialist in the field. I wouldn't think that a housing upgrade would cost the earth, and if it stops the thing choking up high then trialling it would be worthwhile. You may also find that any loss of response is academic when you look at the entire picture.

its very tempting, I dont think there is any point trying to get anything more out of this one pretty much maxed out already..

And i could probably get the same power from a 2871 with far better response

You might be surprised what a bigger turbine housing will do, and the extra ignition timing that it allows you to run. If you went with a -32 spec 2871 all you would get is a smaller turbine rotor with the same sized compressor :P FWIW, I found a -31 spec (ie 48 trim) GT2871 high flow very good, progressive and fast with 225rwkW. Never looked fast but it really covered ground nicely for a road car.

Edited by Dale FZ1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...