Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Approx 190rwkw?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Man chuck the engine!

My RB20 makes 160rwkw with just 1bar boost zorst and POD why would i spend another $1-$3000 to get a 2535?????

Should be at least makin 220rwkw with that kinda boost, AT LEAST!

But i'm headin off the beaten track and goin Apexi Turbo just as good flows the same HP as a 2540R but comes on boost @ 3000rpm in a RB20

Comes with head gasket, braided lines etc everything u need to under $4000 BRAND NEW :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-690992
Share on other sites

Approx 190rwkw?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Man chuck the engine!

My RB20 makes 160rwkw with just 1bar boost zorst and POD why would i spend another $1-$3000 to get a 2535?????

Should be at least makin 220rwkw with that kinda boost, AT LEAST!

But i'm headin off the beaten track and goin Apexi Turbo just as good flows the same HP as a 2540R but comes on boost @ 3000rpm in a RB20

Comes with head gasket, braided lines etc everything u need to under $4000 BRAND NEW :)

and which apexi turbo kit would that be??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-691041
Share on other sites

my friend with an R32 GTS-T made 227rwkw on the same dyno with a Garrett GT25 (400hp core) and this thing halls ass compared to some other GTS' i've seen.

if it's for a RB25, you'd want atleast a GT2540 which can make 250fwkw on 1bar.

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/turbo/...c_gt/ac_gt.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-691363
Share on other sites

....

if it's for a RB25, you'd want atleast a GT2540 which can make 250fwkw on 1bar.

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/turbo/...c_gt/ac_gt.html

have you actually seen this turbo make this power on an RB25? what was the boost curve like?

not bad as its similar power to the HKS2835, and only a tad less than my 3037S 56T does at 1 bar. I would love to see a dyno for it, as I have never heard anyone describe the HKS 2540 as anything but laggy - so it would be good to see that rumour put to rest.

Its also interesting that a 2535 makes less power than a 2530 - which will put down around 230rwkw at 1.2bar.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-691738
Share on other sites

Just had a lookat the link you posted RS500, obviously your friend had a few problems with his 2535 turbo setup, as it is rated only just lower than the 2540 by 10kw at 1bar, BUT the mid range and bottom end is a fair bit stronger.

By comparison as the 2530 makes around 230 rwkw at 1.2bar, you should be expecting around 240rwkw at 1.2bar from the 2535.

the guy who only made 190 at 1.7 bar obviously had huge problems.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-691751
Share on other sites

steve,

lets not start this again.

if you read my post properly, you would've seen that i mentioned 250fwkw (flywheel kw) and not rwkw.

no i haven't seen one of these on an RB25, and what i have mentioned is what is advertised by HKS themselves.

also, i believe the GT2540 might be laggy in a twin configuration on an RB26, but i'm sure they're quite good as a single on an RB25.

check the link that i provided for the power curve, it's just as peaky b/w 3000 - 4000rpm (only more powerful) as the 2530 on the RB20.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-691913
Share on other sites

Yep, I have seen the link, sorry your fwkw confused me a bit, as I am used to either hp, bhp, rwhw, awhp - and havent seen that expression before.

I did have a look at that link, and noticed the 2535 has more down low, but sacrifices 13 hp up top.

Sorry if it offends, but I have seen a less than glowing report on one of these turbos (2540) on a SR20 in Zoom or HPI (cant remeber which). I would really love to see if the guys who set it up got it all wrong or not, but until I see a dyno, or hear a report from someone who owned one, why should I believe otherwise? Also, as you mention, the 2540 has a really poor rap from gtr owners.

You say lets not start this again, but you quote very poor figures for a GT2535, then go on to say you want at least a 2540, which I think is unfair if you havent seen a 2540 in action AND how do you know what trbs wants in a turbo, all he asks is 'are these any good' Your words here appear to be that of a salesman, not someone wanting to help someone assess the suitability of a specific turbo he asks about.

I think this is abit misleading, as you havent actually seen how this turbo goes on an RB 25, nor have you seen how a 2535 goes. The post about the 2535 on RB20 only shows that the info you provided is not really appropriate, as the website quotes the power at only just under a 2540.

I have seen dynos for a 2530 on RB25, which is smaller again than a 2535. and they go quite well, esp if someone is looking for an upgrade that provides a good midrange with reasonable top end (230rwkw at 1.2bar). By comparison, the 2535 has better bottom end and better top end.

Its nice of you to try and sell your mates turbo, but I believe your posts are somewhat miss leading, as you are not presenting the facts you have in an unbiased manner - this would be somewhat confusing for someone who is looking for info on a turbo.

trbs - I am sorry if I have added any confusion, but I would just like to suggest you make as sure as possible any information you see on here is as valid as possible before you make a decision. A turbo costs alot of money and the right turbo for you will be different to what someone else may want.

From the graphs on the HKS site, the 2535 will deliver a better power band for the street, where you spend more time at between 2-4000rpm than you do at 6-7000rpm. I have been in an rb2530 powered RB20 Cefiro, and it was an awesome setup. Sly33 has a 2530 in an R33, and he loves it. By comparison, the 2540 appears more laggy than either - the top end gains appear only marginal.

RS500 good luck selling the turbo for your mate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-691944
Share on other sites

Steve,

firstly, i am not a salesman and never have been. If i can help someone out with some info that i know of, i will share that with them.

yes, i haven't had first hand experience with the GT2540 on a RB25 but I commented on the GT2540 simply for the fact that 'In my opinion I' believe it is better suited to the RB25 based on the information and data/specs which i have seen.

Trbs didn't specify his requirements/application for the turbo so i don't know what he wants from it, therefore, i comment on what i would prefer on that engine fomr the info which i read form the manufacturers website.

This information obtained by the manufacturer's website is what i use and should be used by all customers as to draw their own conclusions on what the HKS turbo's are capable of and then to make their own decision on what to buy.

If u have noticed in many of my posts in the past, i always try to provide specs, websites, etc (which you have referred to also) so that people (out there) can take my comments and use the data to understand more about the topic and to be able to make their own decision so don't go thinking you're some authoritive figure on turbo matching.

i do believe that the GT2540 has been found to be laggy in a twin configuration on a RB26DETT, but i believe it is quite well suited to the RB25 as a single turbo, given the larger engine capacity, it wouldn't be laggy at all.

My comment regarding the GT2535 on the RB20 was based on what i saw on my friend's dyno, so given that info, it has left a sour impression on me. Maybe the car had problems in the setup/tune which is why it didn't make the power u state, but at the same time, that's what it made, so that's what i told.

also, your claim (even though inconsistent - last time it was a RB20) that a GT2530 can make 230rwkw on an RB25 @ 1.2bar is only as valid as my one, as you could be telling figures from a high reading dyno, therefore, we cannot take these comparisons into consideration.

That's a pretty hard comparison when your friend is running a RB25 which is 500cc larger than the RB20 that i mentioned.

Trbs,

my apologies about this, good luck with your decision and hopefully you can use the info in this forum to help u learn more about turbo sizing and specs so that u can understand and know exactly what u need for what u want out of your car.

cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-692333
Share on other sites

It's OK Steve, I'll finish, rather than start. I have tried 2540's on an SR20, on an RB20 on an RB25 and even a pair on an RB26. I have yet to find an standard or highly modified engine that suites them. I think they are a grossly mismatched turbo between compressor and turbine (ie; either the turbine is too small or the compressor is too big).

I have at least a dozen dyno graphs to support my views, when someone comes up with one the proves me wrong, then I will apologise to HKS. I have had this out there for over 2 years and no one has even come close.

That's it, next ..............

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34482-hks-gt2535-turbo/#findComment-692339
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...