Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im just telling him whats real

-instead of hateing he should be particpating.........

who knows what if this motor makes it to 600whp and lives

-i think its posible

look at our honda motors

a b20 is the thinest sleeves and people would crack the sleeves at 7-9lbs of boost......

for years thats what everyone though...

-now after our test we have quit a few of them at over 20-psi with 400+whp(stock block!)

-from this i say since a stock honda block with tiny rods and weak rod bolts can take 100hp per cylinder

why can t a rb25 factory turbo motor take 100whp per cylinder.......

yea you get the off motor that can make more than the average.

I've seen first hand a stock bottom end 26 make 500rwkw, so what?

it didn't last long.

if you actually ho back and read my post and take it in, you'll see/understand why most don't want to push the limits.

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

that s what people say when they ve never been in a big turbo car........

This thread is getting f**king retarded...

You're obviously here to argue and not take on some of the advice/info being provided to you from some very knowledgable people, so why bother starting the thread? Stick to your fully sick Honda's and your 'monster' 400hp and continue to be envious of our Aussie built RB's :(

-from this i say since a stock honda block with tiny rods and weak rod bolts can take 100hp per cylinder

why can t a rb25 factory turbo motor take 100whp per cylinder.......

So we go from stock engine to just stock block or what? Most of the people in here seem to be talking stock engines, as in, unopenned - not stock block.

Compare apples and apples.

You honestly seem to be more set on trolling rather than learning from the wealth of experience on these forums.

yup thats y we re on e85 with a shit load of meth injection lol....

what kind of dyno did u do 480 on? and if ur from australia do u have quarter mile mph to back up the power?

thanks for info

Mainline dyno's and Dyno Dynamics (not in shoot out mode) all ranging from 348-356rwkw (it has been on 4 different dyno's), never been on a hub dyno. I'm from Adelaide, South Australia which hasn't had a drag strip for 8 or so years so no slips to back up power.

my mate with the 25 s14 was tuned by 101 in brisbane so not to sure what dyno but the car was used for drift. i think he ended up spinning a bearing. mind you he rebuilt it back to standard and untill he parted the car it was going strong for over a year.

dont be so abrasive. you sound like a wanker.

been making 430rwhp out of a stock internaled rb25 for over 2 years now.

car is thrashed regularly, and sees drift days, circuit days, hill runs and has done 1 boring ass drag day.

car ran @ 12.9 @ 119mph with full drift setup as drag racing just not worth altering the car for

figure has been made on multiple dyno's including hub and roller.

car makes full boost by 3400...

Read the dyno thread, proof of lots of 250-300kw rb25s with all the details of how they got it

you are using a laggy shit dinosaur turbo, you will never get good results, peak power sure but a crap powerband. Get a decent garret gt28 gt30 style turbo to match your power levels and you will get better results.

Edited by Rolls
dude in post 1 says he is on e85 ash which is why i thought it was relavent

otherwise its 385rwhp on pulp

as it states

we r on e85 with a big jet on meth injection

-for u guys that r too scared of alchol try it u will never turn back!

wow! its 2010 guys by now we should all know

Gasoline is for washing parts, alcohol is for drinking and nitro is for racing!

man up....

You do realise that methanol isn't nitro...

I love when my stereotypical hatred for Americans arrogance is always confirmed whenever I converse with one ;)

yea but we have used nitro and not afraid of it

-unlike all u we have tested it

-if nitro isn t so expensive we would be injection it with methanol.................

now that will jump hp....

yea you get the off motor that can make more than the average.

I've seen first hand a stock bottom end 26 make 500rwkw, so what?

it didn't last long.

if you actually ho back and read my post and take it in, you'll see/understand why most don't want to push the limits.

the thing is that was then

now we have better techonolgy and cheaper race gas(e85)with meth injection.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...