Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

:stupid:

124mph is what a full weight (1700kg+) R33 GTR will do with 330-350rwkw.

No way it was 500rwhp in a lighter body with 124mph

in america a dynojet the old one s like ours is standed...

if you run a dynodyamic like most of you guys it s not reliable (dyno will not read the same from shop to shop cause its adjustable)

and a dynopack is a hub dyno so it would read alot higher( also adjustable so its no consistance)

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Who cares what the power really is. The dyno is there for tuning and upgrade comparisons, so long as you are using the same dyno everytime then you can see what changes net the best results. Most dynos in this country are probably dyno dynamics (though I could be wrong, not really sure) and they wouldnt be out by too much more then say 5-10% from eachother. Which in the grand scheme of things isnt really that much.

I can comment on the methanol helping make power safely and easily. It is amazing stuff, you can be around 15% too rich and it doesnt affect power production, it just runs alot cooler, if you run it too lean, it wont knock, it just usually melts pistons pretty quick.

We pumped out 590rwhp on the rb30det w/gt35r last week. Boost bled from 23psi down to 19psi (running on gate pressure only, no controller). When we setup the solenoid and get it to flatline boost to redline I suspect the power will grow a little over the 600rwhp mark. Which is going out of the realm of regular gt35r territory by a long shot.

I dont know why alot of other people dont run it, or atleast run it in a mix w/ 98pulp. I just cant express enough how magical it is. The only negative is you need a smaller less efficient radiator and oil cooler. Not very often you go backwards when running a turbo car in those two areas lol.

there are heaps of people here that are making that power on stock rb25's

why are you not capable of understanding this?

did you look at the dyno thread like we told you?

also a dynapac hub dyno can read higher, or it can read the same as a dyno dynamics etc, as there is a correction mode for this.

(also my previous motor lasted 3 very hard years at that level, but did die eventually)

Ye. They can last at over 400 for a while. But look at his many have broken at 300hp. Any number of things can go wrong

90% is bad tuning, or something breaking to cause the tune to go out, afm/fuel pump/injectors failing. If any of this goes at any power level it can kill a motor quite quickly.

My cousins bf ran his r33 with around 420rwhp on a stock internal rb25 for around a 1.5 yrs thrashing it at drift days before it blew. That was pretty good considering it did alot of street racing and skids also.

mmm..but if youre only running in the mid 120s then it isnt really making 500+ now is it

Exactly as we were saying :D

His "500rwhp" is like our 400rwhp - or there abouts.

So yes - in his terms 500rwhp is most certainly possible

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
    • I got adjustable after market rear camber arm to replace the stock one's because got sick of having to buy new rear tyres every few months. Can anyone please let me know what the best adjustment length would be. I don't have the old ones anymore to get measurements. I'm guessing the stock measurement minus a few mm would do it. Please any help on replacing them would be fantastic I've watched the YouTube clips but no-one talks about how long to set the camber arm to.
×
×
  • Create New...